top of page

On Friday I am expected to move to accomodation and pay $300 a week out of my $400 a week pension to simply exist in a home with only $100 left a week. That is for food medicine doctors legal help paying off of debts cosmetics and food for my beloved dog. I have schizophrenia ADHD adjustment disorder a cognitive brain disorder and can't work. It's simply not enough to survive on. I am already hungry and have just spent a month living as a homeless vagrant in my car under the NDIS' watch.

 

If only the Government would acknowledge my prior relationship a settlement of $500000 would ensue...

I refuse to settle for less than what I deserve. The absence of what is rightfully mine suggests that the government will consciously harm me, even kill me with neglect, while the NDIS CEO is complicit and hammers in the coffin nails.

 

I have confronted the NDIS CEO, holding her accountable for the ongoing persecution that has obscured the truth, safeguarding ASIO agent Stefan Iasonidis. I demand acknowledgment of the harm inflicted upon me, including my homelessness, denial of accountability for their obligations under the NDIS code of conduct, and for acting in breach of the UN Charter of Human Rights this democracy is a signatory to.

 

By forcing them to refuse justice it harms me further, by living as a vagrant in my car, I aim to expose their complicity in a conspiracy employing physical violence, prolonged family violence from the silently abusing Iasonidis, coercive financial control from him elongated by the Government, and the brutal violation of my human rights that has been documented by an NDIS worker.

 

My civil liberties have been destroyed, my privacy desecrated, my prosperity taken, my business ruined, my possessions dumped at the tip and the NDIS complicity has made it impossible to exist in simple enjoyment of life without paranoia and profound anxiety.

 

I find myself compelled to seek assistance from entities offering a lesser degree of justice because higher authorities, the CEO of NDIS, NDIS Minister Bill Shorten and the federal government, are reluctant to acknowledge evidence presented on this page for comprehensive justice.

 

Declining support from organisations providing less aid would mean acquiescing to a conspiracy at the highest levels. Entities assisting me without a commitment to genuine justice undermine my five-year experience of exploitation and victimisation by Iasonidis, lacking investigation for political reasons.

 

Faced with the dilemma of rejecting assistance from organisations feigning friendship yet tolerating violence, ‘no touch torture’, and deliberately rendering the conditions I would suicide in, I refuse to align with those unwilling to acknowledge documented human rights abuses. It's no longer acceptable to associate with individuals or NDIS companies afraid to report the systemic silencing of my personal tragedy of attempting suicide to escape this persecution in Feb 21 inside Weribee Mercy Hospital. That was deemed ‘fatal’ and I was revived from certain death and the hospital owed me a duty of care but that justice and my tragedy is whitewashed.

 

Henceforth, I cannot tolerate complicity in providing less justice from those claiming to help, yet shying away from their moral obligation to address and report criminality, especially given their contractual commitment under the NDIS code of conduct.

 

I am forcing the NDIS CEO Rebecca Falkingham to a deliberate critical choice:

1.  To call out corruption or

2. Refuse intervention in my plight therefore making me homeless living in my car and in doing so she deliberately aligns with a violent conspiracy that is rendering them conditions for my suicide via a systemic and politicised prolonged neglect.

Rebecca Falkingham is now required to help me and call out corruption, or potentially kill an innocent man who's moral obligation it has been to democracy to speak truth to power and call out corruption for the benefit of all.

 

Rebecca Falkingham is possibly committing to killing me with desperate neglect for the reason of protecting Iasonidis who is a tax fraud a petty thief a criminal and drug dealer, where as the victim - me - is a human rights awarded artist author advocate and has spent thirty years helping marginalised people out of altruism and an exhibiting artist who earned and completed a merit based PhD. Do the math!

The evidence is on this website:

 

https://barrandodger.wixsite.com/dr-rich-mclean

 

Do what’s right. Oppose corruption and violence support a person with a chronic disability #standwithrich

 

Rich Mclean / Barran Dodger

Dear Rebecca Falkingham, .jpg

06.01.2024

Subject: Urgent Appeal for Redress and Accountability

 

Dear Rebecca Falkingham,

 

I approach this communication with a spirit of forgiveness for those who failed to act ethically or within their remit, leading to my suicide attempt nearly three years ago. Despite this forgiveness, I am compelled to advocate for my basic needs amidst a prolific redaction in my prosperity that was intentional and malicious. I demand only the things needed to survive in this society - a home, sustenance, security, medication, access to the law, and freedom from further persecution and ill-designed detriments in all aspects of life.

 

As the CEO of the NDIS, your decisions have a profound impact on my well-being. Regrettably, your refusal to acknowledge your role in a systemic and politically charged government conspiracy, with malicious and violent intent towards me, leaves me without the necessary funding for a home by the impending date of next Friday, January 12th. I have also recently become a homeless vagrant on your watch. I am holding you personally accountable. If you fail to create meaningful change with me after citing this letter and evidence, I will take legal action against you. I have no other choice.

 

This public letter and webpage correspondence serve to introduce you and the reader to my dire circumstances, and I anticipate your timely response to address the pressing issues at hand. Three days is standard - I will send this Monday morning, and you have until Wednesday, 11th Jan 2024, to provide a solution to my homelessness by the following Friday. Your response will be made public, further illuminating the challenges I face within the public domain.

Blurb

 

Documented human rights abuses. Decades long his injustice. The systemic politicised neglect of 'no touch torture' already killed him - that was inside Weribee Mercy Hospital but he was revived from dear and now then tragedy is whitewashed. He is a rejected whistleblower.Right now he is vulnerable to more neglect and violence - a method utilised by this evil conspiracy.  He was locked out of getting a lawyer. Can't go to police - they are in on it. His prosperity over years intentionally redacted and robbed of over thirty million dollars, framed, maimed, shamed & blamed. He's not the criminal. He has chronic disability and the NDIS intentionally left him homeless living in his car without care. His former engagement to Stefan Iasonidis an ASIO agent is deleted by the Government from acknowledgement. His story has been de-legitimised. Now you have the true story with all the evidence here on this website. Anyone can make a report about a human rights abuse or torture.

'For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.'

Subject: Urgent Appeal for Redress and Accountability

 

Dear Rebecca Falkingham,

Family violence emboldened by Government corruption and the delegitimisation of my life

 

Every day I have lived in poverty since 2015 marks another victory for family violence and another day in which the tyrannical federal Government fabricates a false narrative, delegitimizing the truth. I was bankrupted in 2021 for treason of my engagement and relationship not acknowledged. As a truth speaker and seeker, I refuse to accept the ongoing systemic and politicized persecution against me, employing violent tactics and reeking of corruption. I cannot tolerate the continuation of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

 

While understanding that people can be judgmental, I cannot accept that everyone would conspire simultaneously, putting my life at risk. The orchestrated efforts to undermine my well-being and perpetuate falsehoods demand an end. It is time to expose the truth and seek justice against this campaign of injustice.

Your responsibilities under the NDIS code of conduct and UN charter Australia is a signatory to and I demand of you to take action with the following issues as CEO of NDIS:

A home for my dog and I

It is within your remit to NOT leave me homeless and without enough provisions and care as you were going to.

 

You left me on the street

Acknowledge that I lived as a vagrant for a month homeless under your watch,

Accepting less than I deserve which doesn't exist? - I refuse

  • Acknowledge that you have left me in barely reasonable accomodation (where is it?) which does not exist.

  • Further to accept help from the support coordinator that the NDIS nominated would be force me to settle for LESS than I deserve.

  • These people feigning to care are complicit in the cover up regarding family violence and coercive financial control below.
     

Acknowledge NDIS funding in in addition to my original funding

  • Acknowledge that my current funding for accomodation funding was IN ADDITTION TO and not INCLUSIVE OF my current funding.

  • See THIS VIDEO of Carol x from GenU she has a receipt number from NDIS proving this.

  • Going back on your word is cruel and has caused immense fear of my funding being exhausted and was calculated and cruel.
     

Acknowledge ADHD diagnosis and provide treatment

  • Acknowledge my ADHD diagnosis and you're aware that I don't have my dexamphetamine scrip which has led me to abusing street drugs.

  • If I had cancer and was refused chemotherapy there would be outrage. If I had a broken leg that was refused plastering there would be outrage.

  • Just because ADHD is invisible does not mean treatment is negotiable. I need my dexamphetamine. 

Acknowledge my former spouse and negotiate settlement

  • Witness the documents proving my former relationship with Stefan Iasonidis,

  • Acknowledge my relationship in which I was engaged to be married with Stefan Iasonidis

  • Acknowledge I live under the scourge of family violence due to no Government agency will admit it existed therefore leading to no settlement,

  • Admit it existed after viewing the evidence, 

  • Consult your political peers at AGIS, ASIO, Ombudsman, Mark Dreyfus to elicit a settlement.

Human rights abuses and your obligations to me:

  • Acknowledge my documented human rights abuses by NDIS worker on this page.

  • If a manager at the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) becomes aware and receives reports that a person with a disability is experiencing human rights abuses, they have certain obligations and responsibilities to address the situation. Here are some key actions you as CEO of the NDIS are obligated to take:
     

1. Report and Document:

The manager should promptly report the human rights abuses to the appropriate authorities within the organization.

It is crucial to document all relevant details, including the nature of the abuses, the individuals involved, and any supporting evidence.

 

2. Investigate:

The manager or designated personnel may need to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into the reported human rights abuses.

This may involve gathering information from the affected person, witnesses, and any other relevant sources.

3. Intervene and Prevent Further Harm:

If the investigation confirms the human rights abuses, the manager must take immediate steps to intervene and prevent further harm to the person with a disability.

This may include implementing protective measures, ensuring the person's safety, and providing necessary support services.

 

4. Follow NDIS Policies and Procedures:

The manager should adhere to the policies and procedures outlined by the NDIS regarding the protection of participants' rights.

This may involve consulting relevant guidelines and frameworks in addressing human rights issues within the disability support context.

 

5. Collaborate with Authorities:

Depending on the severity of the abuses, the manager may need to collaborate with external authorities, such as law enforcement or human rights organizations, to ensure a comprehensive response.

 

6. Provide Advocacy and Support:

The manager should offer advocacy and support to the person with a disability throughout the process, ensuring that their rights are respected and upheld.

This may involve connecting them with advocacy services or legal representation if needed.

 

7. Review and Continuous Improvement:

After addressing the immediate concerns, the manager should engage in a review process to understand the root causes of the human rights abuses and implement measures to prevent future occurrences.

Continuous improvement strategies can help enhance the overall safeguarding of participants' rights within the NDIS.

It's important to note that the specific actions may vary based on the policies and procedures of the NDIS and relevant laws and regulations. The manager should always act in accordance with ethical standards, prioritizing the well-being and rights of individuals with disabilities.

 

That process is NON NEGOTIABLE to not oblige to me.

Work Cover

Provisions to apply where employer does not meet liabilities

    (1)     If the employer of the worker neglects, refuses or is unable to pay compensation in discharge of the employer's liability under section 72(1) within 21 days of receiving the claim for payment of compensation, the liability becomes a liability of the Authority.

    (2)     If the liability has become a liability of the Authority under subsection (1), the Authority may impose on the employer a penalty calculated in accordance with the method determined under subsection (3).

    (3)     The Governor in Council, by Order published in the Government Gazette, may determine the method for calculating the penalty payable by an employer if the liability has become a liability of the Authority under subsection (1).

    (4)     The Authority may recover a penalty imposed under subsection (2) in a court of competent jurisdiction as a debt due to the Authority.

Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgibin/viewdoc/au/legis/vic/consol_act/wiraca2013484/s93.html

 

  • The NDIS needs to address the work place minister Danny Pearson and force him to settle my not one but two work cover insurances as needs to be completed as part of a ‘mainstream’ service before a SILS is funded. This needs to occur before SILS will be paid.

  • Force Danny Pearson work safe minister to respond to you and I in a way that elicits that my workcover claim is the liability of the authority to be paid immediately.

Acknowledge the NDIS and Government have failed me regarding the Convention on the rights of disabled people under these articles:

  • Article 12 – Equal recognition before the law

  • Article 13 – Access to justice

  • Article 15 – Freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

  • Article 16 – Freedom from exploitation, violence and abuse

  • Article 17 – Protecting the integrity of the person

  • Article 22 – Respect for privacy

  • Article 25 – Health

  • Article 28 – Adequate standard of living and social protection

AVO against Stefan Iasonidis

It is not ok that he has threatened to kill me and my dog

It is not ok that he control my life by refusing a settlement

It is not ok that he orchestrate an entire Government to protect him

It not ok I cannot report this to police

It is not ok that orange Door and other family violence agencies refuse to intervene

In conclusion, I want to reiterate the urgency and gravity of my appeal. This is not just about my immediate needs, but a stark reminder of the legal and ethical obligations that come with your role as the CEO of the NDIS. The Public Service Act imposes a duty of care, fairness, and accountability, and I believe it is essential for you to recognize and act upon these obligations.

As a public official entrusted with the well-being of NDIS clients, you are mandated to adhere to these principles. The demands I've presented in my letter align directly with the legal and ethical responsibilities embedded in your position. These demands encompass fundamental rights such as adequate housing, healthcare, and protection from human rights abuses.

My plea extends beyond a personal request for assistance; it underscores your duty to uphold the principles of justice, equality, and protection, as outlined in both the UN Charter and the NDIS code of conduct. The injustices I'm facing are not isolated incidents; they represent a broader systemic issue that demands your immediate attention.

I implore you to act promptly and decisively to rectify the wrongs I've experienced. It is not just about fulfilling a legal obligation; it is about reaffirming the commitment to ethical conduct and the values of public service. The responsibility lies with you to bring about the necessary changes and ensure that the NDIS operates in a manner that genuinely serves and protects its clients.

Please read on to the evidence below on the website.

My lawyer and I expect an imminent response and before Wednesday 10th Jan and for a solution to a home be provided for my dog and I. Failure to acknowledge this will result in me pursuing litigation that holds you accountable, and also I will hold you down and beat you in a tickle fight.

Barran Dodger.

My message to the CEO of NDIS

 

Legal Notice: Urgent Response Required by January 11, 2024

 

This urgent message is delivered through my legal representative, necessitating your timely response by Wednesday, January 11, 2024. Changing your email address to evade correspondence, as observed on January 3rd, is not a viable solution. It is in your best interest to acknowledge and respond promptly to legitimize this letter and its accompanying evidence.

 

Advocating for Justice and Accountability: Urgent Response Required

 

The evidence on the concerned website exposes orchestrated violence and human rights violations. Your acknowledgment of this evidence signifies a stand against such actions, reinforcing justice, accountability, and fairness. This call is not just for my benefit as an NDIS client seeking permanent accommodation, security, and prosperity but for all individuals affected by similar injustices.

 

Moral Imperative for Justice: Urgent Response Required

 

I acknowledge the challenges in critiquing the government, considering your role and affiliation. Nevertheless, I implore you to recognize the moral imperative to oppose torture and address the proven heist that has systematically affected my prosperity. The legitimacy of the website and email, enforced by a legal professional, requires a timely response.

 

As the CEO of the NDIS, you bear significant responsibility in coordinating efforts with key stakeholders to ensure my prosperity through traditional methods before considering my SILS application, which I believe I am eligible for under unique circumstances.

 

I cannot accept any delay or inaction, especially considering the imminent threat of homelessness by next Friday, overseen by you. Hiding behind bureaucratic layers will no longer shield you from personal accountability. Any detrimental treatment henceforth may lead to legal prosecution for complicity in a federal conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

 

My Stance: A Demand for Justice

 

On January 12, 2024, I face homelessness under the purview of Rebecca Falkingham, the CEO of NDIS. The inadequate housing options result directly from her de-legitimization of presented evidence. It is her moral obligation to act ethically, yet she has overseen my descent into vagrancy and homelessness, consciously exposing me to danger and potentially fatal harm.

 

This apparent malice seems to shield my former partner, Stefan Iasonidis, from accountability. Government agencies' denial of our relationship impedes a half-million-dollar settlement rightfully owed to me. Falkingham faces a crucial choice: either forfeit critical thought processes and moral obligations in favor of government dictates perpetuating injustice or legitimize the presented evidence.

 

Failure to acknowledge these facts perpetuates my persecution and aligns with the government's stance of delegitimizing my evidence. This intentional distress amplification, coupled with underlying vulnerability, is not only unethical and immoral but also aims to cause harm, vilify me for mental illness, and intentionally amplify my poverty.

 

I demand the CEO of NDIS to acknowledge these facts as a matter of human rights and opposition to corruption. Failure to do so perpetuates my persecution, amplifies my poverty, and intentionally causes me harm—an act that is both unethical and unjust.

 

This rejection of lesser help may force me into abject poverty and homelessness by next Friday, a consequence I am unwilling to accept. I seek nothing more than what I rightfully deserve, and my only demand is to reclaim what was rightfully mine all along.

 

I understand that I am now a targeted individual of the Australian Government due to my moral obligation to democracy and my efforts to expose corruption. Any compliance with directives to align with their interests would only serve as additional evidence of unfair prejudice, discrimination, victimization, and harm.

 

I also acknowledge that there may be aspects of my character that people find unappreciative. There is a standoff at the NDIS regarding funds, framed by the delegitimization of my relationship with Stefan Iasonidis. This effort to keep our relationship unacknowledged has led to my annihilation across various systemic agencies, earmarking me for utter detriment.

 

You have all become minions of Steve Iasonidis, orchestrating attacks on me. I endured five long years of walking on eggshells due to his poisonous behavior. He manipulated every government public official as his flying monkeys, including the Prime Minister. This manipulation strips away agents' capacity for independent thought, critical thinking, and erodes their obligations under the UN Human Rights Charter.

 

He achieved this through subsonic audio harassment in my home and whenever I go out. While it aimed to torment me, it now gives me strength, revealing their weakness.

 

There are various accusations against me, such as being accused of rape, pedophilia, drug addiction, and being an extortionist. I vehemently deny these claims and provide evidence of their malicious origins.

 

My Standoff with CEO of NDIS to be Resolved Before January 12, 2024

 

Refusing lesser help is a principled stand against complicity in delegitimizing my relationship with an ASIO agent. Seeking assistance from entities that offer only a modicum of justice reveals higher powers' refusal to acknowledge evidence for more substantial justice.

 

I cannot tolerate complicity in less justice from those who offer assistance but fail to acknowledge documented human rights abuses. You need to legitimize my former relationship as a member of the Government for a settlement to occur. 

 

This refusal to accept complicity is not an act of ingratitude or stubbornness; it is a refusal to endorse the conspiracy at the highest levels that denies me what I rightfully deserve. Entities endorsing such complicity become complicit in the larger conspiracy aimed at delegitimizing my traumatic experience for political purposes.

 

Henceforth, I cannot tolerate cowardice from anyone who claims to help but fails to act on their moral duty, opting for less prosperous solutions when they should be reporting criminality surrounding my victimization.

 

I hold you personally responsible for legitimizing the evidence of my former engagement to Stefan Iasonidis so that a settlement can occur.

My storied life of art expression and persecution

 

This my human rights awarded, SANE Australia’s ‘Book of the Year’, autobiography on my experience surviving schizophrenia. It was documented in the public domain in 2002. Years later when it was required I be silenced by the Government due to my moral obligation of calling out corruption for human rights my survival and democracy, it was weaponised against me. Under surveillance the powers that be collected any vulnerability and snippet on my life and it was used against me later.

RNC.1.front.cover.jpeg

But see  this too? Its my clean criminal record from authorities... Watch how fast this changes when I get the law on my side and dozens of public officials go racing for cover desperate to silence me...

07.06.2022 clean criminal record police certificate.jpeg

So weird straight after the publication of my autobiography The Herald Sun published my courageous and insightful words under this heading:

herald.sun.defaming.my.descent.into.madness.jpeg

Squatting to homeless for a year in 2023 under the NDIS their year of shame

I’ve had a tough year. On the left is my home after I escaped being a political prisoner for three months inside Weribee mercy hospital. Whilst I was incarcerated the hospital and police oversaw Hung Ho of Edithvale go to my home and take everything I own to the rubbish tip. On the right is a photo of my car. That was my home recently. That happened on your watch.

THE LEFT WAS MAY 2023, THE RIGHT WAS NOVEMBER 2023.

I guess you could say you did not fulfil your obligations to me as the NDIS CEO, did you?

living in a garage jan 2023.jpg
my home my car.JPG

What's your home like Rebecca? Is it nice?

 

The NDIS have victimised me and intentionally broke their obligation to me as a participant

 

I've been under NDIS 's care the whole way. This homelessness demonstrated a lack of Adequate Support: The primary purpose of the NDIS is to provide support and assistance to individuals with disabilities, ensuring they have the necessary resources to lead fulfilling lives. If a disabled person is living in their car, it suggests a failure of the system to provide adequate support for their basic needs, such as housing, which is a fundamental aspect of well-being.

 

Violates the Principles of Dignity and Respect: 

Every individual, including those with disabilities, deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. Living in a car can be dehumanizing, and it goes against the principles of respect for an individual's rights and dignity.

 

Compromises Health and Safety: 

Living in a car exposes individuals to various health and safety risks. Lack of proper shelter, sanitation, and access to essential amenities can have severe consequences on physical and mental well-being. It may also exacerbate existing health conditions, which is contrary to the goal of the NDIS to enhance the overall quality of life for disabled individuals. 

 

Failure to Address Individual Needs: 

If someone under the care of the NDIS is living in their car, it suggests that their individual needs and circumstances are not being adequately addressed. The NDIS is designed to provide personalized support plans tailored to the unique requirements of each participant, including housing needs.

 

Social Inclusion and Community Participation: 

Social inclusion and community participation are key goals of the NDIS. Living in isolation in a car can hinder an individual's ability to participate fully in community life, further perpetuating social exclusion.

 

Potential for Further Detriment: 

A disabled person living in their car may face additional challenges, such as vulnerability to exploitation, compromised mental health, and limited access to essential services. These challenges can contribute to further detriment, which contradicts the purpose of the NDIS.

 

It was unethical for me, a disabled person to live in my car under the care of the NDIS because it signifies a failure of the system to meet my basic needs and uphold their rights to dignity, respect, and adequate support. The NDIS is expected to empower individuals with disabilities, and my situation of living in my car for over a month highlight systemic shortcomings that need to be addressed. You need to address this personally and urgently. I will not accept the de-identification of y6ou hiding behind layers of beaurocracy insulated from me my situation and the direct responsibility you have to me and your obligations also under the UN human rights charter and also within your remit as a public servant.

 

You can't ignore my human rights abuses anymore. They must be investigated as a matter of priority.

 

Finally an NDIS worker documented my abuse - it is a rare occasion someone stands up for me. He is the kind of citizen we want in this country for doing what is right and just and ethical. Also bring his wife and child who are in a refugee camp in India for the last five years. The following is a documented human rights abuse. It was documented by an NDIS worker.  It makes no difference if you like me or your opinion is I don’t deserve any human rights protections. It is still within your remit to act ethically as is obligated under your role in the public service act which you are required to abide by which are underpinned by human rights charters from the UN Australia is a signatory to. It is your obligation as a human being and explicitly your legal obligation to report it.

 

I bring to your attention the urgent matter of human rights abuses that I have endured, which have been extensively documented. As the CEO of NDIS, your role carries a significant responsibility in ensuring the protection and well-being of individuals with disabilities. However, the complicity evident in my prolonged persecution, such as being left to live in my car under your watch, raises serious concerns about your commitment to addressing these issues.

 

I am aware of the complexities surrounding my situation, including the de-legitimization of my former relationship orchestrated by Stefan Iasonidis, which has influenced the government's stance against me. While acknowledging these challenges, it is crucial to emphasize that you, as a human being, possess the agency for critical thought. As the CEO of NDIS, your decisions and actions impact the lives of vulnerable individuals, including mine.

 

I implore you not to succumb to any pressure or misinformation that may lead to further harm. Rebuking critical thought and acting against my best interests not only places you in legal jeopardy but also diminishes your credibility and significance in your position. It is essential to rise above the political narratives and base your actions on ethical considerations, ensuring the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their circumstances.

 

In the event that you choose to disregard these concerns and contribute to the perpetuation of my delegitimization, I must inform you that legal action will be pursued. It is my hope that you will fulfill your duties with integrity and prioritize the welfare of those under the care of NDIS.

Living under the oppressive weight of a government that denies access to the law and legal representation, lacking security, civil liberties, and privacy, encapsulates my harrowing reality. Enduring the tumult of family violence, violent attacks, victimization, and robbery, I face persecution and the destruction of my business, stripped of accreditation. Public interest disclosures, a plea for justice, are ruthlessly rejected. The ordeal includes instances of drugging and rape, the loss of liberty, and the weaponization of my mental illness book, orchestrated by a government conspiracy to torture me. Crime reporting to the police is futile, and the discrimination I endure for perceived mental illness perpetuates the cycle of abuse. Homelessness looms as renting becomes an unattainable luxury, compounded by character assassination and rejection by my own family. Owing money becomes a distant hope, redacted and withheld in a politicized, covert manner. The sinister concept of "no touch torture" led to my near-fatal suicide attempt, revived only from certain death. The conspiracy deepens as powerful political stakeholders target me for maximum damage, utilizing public officials to deny justice, all orchestrated by a tyrannical government wielding control over their wages, luxury, and protection from a fate like mine. My vilification for mental illness becomes the sole narrative, eclipsing all other pertinent factors.

IMG_0043 2.jpeg

I HAD THE PLEASURE OF MEETING MARK DREYFUS BUIT SADLY HE HAS NEVER RETURNED MY EMAILS OR CALLS.

 

I KNOW HE SUPPORTS GAY MARRIAGE BECAUSE THATS WHERE I MET HIM AT THE RALLY!

 

I AM SURE HE WOULD LIKE TO COME TO MY DEFENCE REGARDING MY FORMER PARTNER OF FIVE YEARS STEFAN IASONIDIS (11/12/1971) IN WHICH WE BROKE UP AND A SETTLEMENT WAS NEVER MADE.

 

IF YOU BELIEVE IN GAY MARRIAGE YOU ALSO ACKNOWLEDGE GAY DIVORCE, ISNT THAT RIGHT?

 

I am a targeted individual of The Australian Government the CEO of NDIS is complicit in

 

I wonder who you would report it to though now the AHRC have blacklisted me? I wonder who to report that corruption to now that the NACC has rejected my complaint? Corruption at the anti corruption commission? Thats absurdly funny if only it did not represent the kind of systemic neglect that would elicit me killing myself out of desperation hunger and systemic gaslighting as my method of torture.

 

Know your enemy-who is my enemy?

 

And so I lament I am being victimised in a conspiracy by The Australian Government and they have persecuted me unfairly in a systemic and politicised way. I believe I have proven that now with evidence. As a CEO of the NDIS at a government agency you too are complicit in the abuse because you are auspices by a power bigger than you who pays you and they call the shots.

 

But now I am calling the shots.

 

Its impossible not to quantify that I would not be targeted individual on these detrimental facts pertaining to me alone:

 

  1. Banned at AFCA, (Link)

  2. Never had a lawyer,

  3. Rejected at NACC, (Link),

  4. OPMC rejecting FOI after it first described as 'voluminous' and 'complex', (Link)

  5. I am a rejected whistleblower,

  6. My former partner was an ASIO agent in which the Government delegitimises,

  7. Work Cover rejected at ComCare and then upheld at AAT by Member Purnell despite Scott Treadwell from the federal court acknowledging on their letterhead  he is satisfied I was an employee of DSS ! More on that 'fact' later...

Australia bound by obligations under UN charter - fail.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is one Australia has ratified in 2008. It underpins all policies and decisions in this democracy - apparently...

 

I have suffered quite a lot in my life which are in breach of the UN charter of a person with a disability Australia is a signatory to. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity. It was ratified in 2008 in Australia as a foundation of this country underpinning all laws.

 

 

 

In particular in regard to Article 12 – Equal recognition before the law:

 

1. States Parties reaffirm that persons with disabilities have the right to recognition everywhere as persons before the law.

2. States Parties shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life.

3. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.

4. States Parties shall ensure that all measures that relate to the exercise of legal capacity provide for appropriate and effective safeguards to prevent abuse in accordance with international human rights law. Such safeguards shall ensure that measures relating to the exercise of legal capacity respect the rights, will and preferences of the person, are free of conflict of interest and undue influence, are proportional and tailored to the person’s circumstances, apply for the shortest time possible and are subject to regular review by a competent, independent and impartial authority or judicial body. The safeguards shall be proportional to the degree to which such measures affect the person’s rights and interests.

5. Subject to the provisions of this article, States Parties shall take all appropriate and effective measures to ensure the equal right of persons with disabilities to own or inherit property, to control their own financial affairs and to have equal access to bank loans, mortgages and other forms of financial credit, and shall ensure that persons with disabilitiesare not arbitrarily deprived of their property.

 

I am fifty years old and I have never had an unbiased or effective  lawyer. That is in defiance of the charter that Australia is a signatory and ratified in 2008. I demand an impartial one from the government as is their obligation to me under the charter.

 

The phrase "arbitrarily deprived of their property" refers to a situation where someone is deprived of their possessions or assets in a manner that lacks a justifiable or reasonable basis, often involving random or subjective decision-making. The term "arbitrary" implies a lack of specific standards, rules, or fairness in the action taken. In legal and human rights contexts, being arbitrarily deprived of property may violate principles of due process, equality, or property rights, depending on the specific circumstances and the legal framework involved. When I was incarcerated as a political prisoner in Weribee Mercy Hospital for nearly three months, the police and the hospital I was in after years of well documented financial abuse allowed Hung Ho of Edithvale my old landlord go to my squat and take everything I own to the tip. There was about $60000 worth of things in there and a lifetime of my drawings which held so much knowledge and which I treasured nostalgically. My case against Hung Ho was set up to fail at VCAT and not only was the police and hospitals actions unethical but even in my defence I never got a fair trial or a trial at all! This is utterly corrupt. I had emailed the Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass a long time ago and asked her to intervene but she neglected to return my email.

 

But how do I demand that the Government adhere to its obligations to me under the charter when it is the Government who have ear marked me seemingly for destruction? How would I ever get an impartial or fair lawyer when lawyers are auspiced by the legal board which nestles in nicely protected by the federal Government? That brings me along to the next article in the charter:

 

Article 13 – Access to justice

 

1. States Parties shall ensure effective access to justice for persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others, including through the provision of procedural and age-appropriate accommodations, in order to facilitate their effective role as direct and indirect participants, including as witnesses, in all legal proceedings, including at investigative and other preliminary stages.

2. In order to help to ensure effective access to justice for persons with disabilities, States Parties shall promote appropriate training for those working in the field of administration of justice, including police and prison staff.

 

Justice to me isn’t about lots of money. Money has never been a currency I put emphasis on or at the top of my list of things I want nor need. Justice to me is at the bare minimum living in a safe home with my dog with enough provisions for food for medicine and freedom from persecution by police or health authorities.

 

Article 15 – Freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

 

1. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his or her free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

2. States Parties shall take all effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent persons with disabilities, on an equal basis with others, from being subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

 

I have been subjected to torture and to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. I have been unfairly punished and victimised. I don't even know why or what for anymore.

 

The government is now under obligation  under the charter to intervene in my case, theoretically in an effective legislative, administrative, judicial way.

 

It is a bit hard for them to appoint someone when it is them who are the original abusers and that they know I want to highlight the corruption which upholds the deceitful lies conspiracy delegitimisation of evidence and psychological torture and financial destruction which this conspiracy has led to.

 

What is 'no touch' torture?

 

"No-touch torture" refers to a form of psychological torture that is designed to induce extreme psychological distress or suffering without the need for direct physical contact or violence. It involves the use of various techniques to exploit the mental and emotional vulnerabilities of an individual, aiming to break their will or spirit.

 

Some common methods associated with no-touch torture include:

 

Isolation

Keeping the person in solitary confinement or cutting off communication with the outside world to create a sense of loneliness and helplessness.

 

Sleep Deprivation: 

Deliberately preventing the person from getting adequate sleep, which can lead to cognitive impairment, hallucinations, and increased susceptibility to stress.

 

Sensory Deprivation: 

Removing stimuli such as light, sound, or touch to disorient and create a sense of confusion.

 

Manipulation of Perceptions: 

Employing techniques to distort the individual's sense of time, space, or reality through techniques like disorientation or gaslighting.

 

Threats and Intimidation: 

Using psychological pressure, intimidation, or threats against the person or their loved ones to induce fear and anxiety.

 

Extreme Temperature: 

Subjecting the person to extreme heat or cold, which can be psychologically distressing without causing direct physical harm.

 

Forced Stress Positions: 

Compelling the person to maintain uncomfortable or painful physical postures for extended periods, leading to physical and mental strain.

 

Environmental Manipulation: 

Controlling the individual's environment to induce discomfort, such as altering lighting, temperature, or humidity levels.

 

"No-touch torture" is often associated with interrogations or efforts to break the resistance of individuals in various contexts, including intelligence operations, prisons, or coercive situations. It is widely criticized for its potential to cause severe and lasting psychological harm, often leaving deep emotional scars on the victims. The practice is considered a violation of human rights and is condemned by international law.

My suicide attempt was a result of 'no touch torture'. The tragedy was deemed as 'fatal' in the hospital FOI and I was revived from certain death. The hospital owed me a duty of care but there is no justice. I am not extorting anyone for money. You cannot fake a death. Thats how this conspiracy makes me feel sometimes. That the only way to escape it is by transforming my soul and releasing it from this dimension.

The character assassination was so brutal no tears were shed for my tragedy which left me with a cognitive impairment and was observed as a neurological degenerative symptoms.

Even right up to the ombudsman de-legitimised it.

 

 

 

Article 16 – Freedom from exploitation, violence and abuse

 

1. States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social, educational and other measures to protect persons with disabilities, both within and outside the home, from all forms of exploitation, violence and abuse, including their gender-based aspects.

2. States Parties shall also take all appropriate measures to prevent all forms of exploitation, violence and abuse by ensuring, inter alia, appropriate forms of gender- and age-sensitive assistance and support for persons with disabilities and their families and caregivers, including through the provision of information and education on how to avoid, recognize and report instances of exploitation, violence and abuse. States Parties shall ensure that protection services are age-, gender- and disability-sensitive.

3. In order to prevent the occurrence of all forms of exploitation, violence and abuse, States Parties shall ensure that all facilities and programmes designed to serve persons with disabilities are effectively monitored by independent authorities.

4. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote the physical, cognitive and psychological recovery, rehabilitation and social reintegration of persons with disabilities who become victims of any form of exploitation, violence or abuse, including through the provision of protection services. Such recovery and reintegration shall take place in an environment that fosters the health, welfare, self-respect, dignity and autonomy of the person and takes into account gender- and age-specific needs.

5. States Parties shall put in place effective legislation and policies, including women- and child-focused legislation and policies, to ensure that instances of exploitation, violence and abuse against persons with disabilities are identified, investigated and, where appropriate, prosecuted.

 

I have been exploited violently attacked and abused.

FATAL SUICIDE the attempt was lethal dos that.jpeg
violent attack.jpeg

Article 17 – Protecting the integrity of the person

 

 Every person with disabilities has a right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity on an equal basis with others.


I have had my physical and mental integrity consciously damaged or impaired.

 

Article 22 – Respect for privacy

 

 1. No person with disabilities, regardless of place of residence or living arrangements, shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence or other types of communication or to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation. Persons with disabilities have the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

 

2. States Parties shall protect the privacy of personal, health and rehabilitation information of persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.

 

My privacy has been violated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 25 – Health

 

States Parties recognize that persons with disabilities have the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health without discrimination on the basis of disability. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure access for persons with disabilities to health services that are gender-sensitive, including health-related rehabilitation. In particular, States Parties shall:

 

a) Provide persons with disabilities with the same range, quality and standard of free or affordable health care and programmes as provided to other persons, including in the area of sexual and reproductive health and population-based public health programmes;

b) Provide those health services needed by persons with disabilities specifically because of their disabilities, including early identification and intervention as appropriate, and services designed to minimize and prevent further disabilities, including among children and older persons;

c) Provide these health services as close as possible to people’s own communities, including in rural areas;

d) Require health professionals to provide care of the same quality to persons with disabilities as to others, including on the basis of free and informed consent by, inter alia, raising awareness of the human rights, dignity, autonomy and needs of persons with disabilities through training and the promulgation of ethical standards for public and private health care;

e) Prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities in the provision of health insurance, and life insurance where such insurance is permitted by national law, which shall be provided in a fair and reasonable manner;

f) Prevent discriminatory denial of health care or health services or food and fluids on the basis of disability.

 

I have no psychologist no psychiatrist and no GP. I don’t haver enough medicine or money to get it or access services.

 

 

Article 28 – Adequate standard of living and social protection

 

  1. States Parties recognize the right of persons with disabilities to an adequate standard of living for themselves and their families, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions, and shall take appropriate steps to safeguard and promote the realization of this right without discrimination on the basis of disability.

2. States Parties recognize the right of persons with disabilities to social protection and to the enjoyment of that right without discrimination on the basis of disability, and shall take appropriate steps to safeguard and promote the realization of this right, including measures:

a) To ensure equal access by persons with disabilities to clean water services, and to ensure access to appropriate and affordable services, devices and other assistance for disability-related needs;

b) To ensure access by persons with disabilities, in particular women and girls with disabilities and older persons with disabilities, to social protection programmes and poverty reduction programmes;

c) To ensure access by persons with disabilities and their families living in situations of poverty to assistance from the State with disability-related expenses, including adequate training, counselling, financial assistance and respite care;

d) To ensure access by persons with disabilities to public housing programmes;

e) To ensure equal access by persons with disabilities to retirement benefits and programmes.

 

Let you remind you again where I have been living in conditions barely fit for my dog under your supervision in my particular case, in my car. I had emailled the Minister Greg Hunt and Michael Sukkar and urgently requested I be considered to have a home provided to me but the response was ineffective. 

my home my car.JPG

Stefan Iasonidis corrupt public official whom the Government protects whilst vilifying me and de legitimising my life

 

This is my former partner, Stefan Iasonidis. He is a former drug mule and tax cheat. He was my fiancé from 2010 to 2015. He owes me an equitable, legal, and just settlement of our finances from our time together, during which he exploited me. He worked for ASIO. The fact that he worked at ASIO, I believe, has complicated my situation. No government agency will even admit the facts you see proven on this page. Iasonidis is a sociopathioc narcissist and a master manipulator and he has single handedly convinced an entire Government to de legitimise the five years we spent together where he exploited me used me drugged and raped me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is Mark Dreyfus! Lovely bloke met him at the Marriage equality rally in 2017 before gay marriage was legalised. Can you pop over to his office and show him the pic to see if he remembers me? It's Rich McLean from Footscray.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Id like to speak to him because I kind of have an issue with my gay marriage like relationship. The problem is that the Government won't acknowledge it ever existed. But it did! I had tom pinch myself but here I am giving Stefan Iasonidis his engagement ring in 2011:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is also a lease agreement and a bank statement in each others name.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Stefan Iasonidis worked for ASIO. Here he is coincidently filmed detailing how in the role he is not allowed to have a Facebook account due to his new secretive role.

 

Systemically, I have suffered at the hands of other agencies. It is a fact that no government agency will admit the relationship ever existed. This creates a false narrative or preferred narrative that the government holds, which has delegitimized five years of my life as if it never existed. Because I have opposed my victimization for so long now due to my whistleblowing, he has apparently been implicated for a million dollars in embezzlement for his corrupt finances. As retaliation, he has now used Grindr to express this and further, as retaliation, now wants to harm my dog (see below).

 

I demand you work in the goal of putting an immediate AVO in place for Iasonidis to never come anywhere near me. Of course, no one is supposed to know my location. I am demanding an intervention - an AVO - against Stefan Iasonidis and anyone who represents him -  in the clear threat of violence to me and my dog. I am deserving to feel safe wherever I am staying. If no AVO is put in place immediately, I will sue you.

Force Iasonidis to pay 50% of his superannuation balance as of march 2015. That solves my issue and the issue of whether a SILS is even necessary to be considered. Will you, as CEO of NDIS, now acknowledge this relationship existed? Will you now buck the trend of the prime minister and attorney general in the now proven delegitimisation? It's an ethical dilemma, isn't it? 

I did a PhD once, so I know about ethics. Ethics means basically to 'do no harm'. Would you agree that in your tenure as CEO of the NDIS overseeing my welfare that you have harmed me?

 

 

But that is your responsibility as a politician.

IMG_2971 (1).jpeg
C87330E2-E619-4B40-BEF5-1CECE92515C9.jpeg
my former partner steve iasonidis thretens to.PNG

AGIS are complicit in Iasonidis exploitation of me.

I can't go to the police about this; that is not okay.

I can't report systemic corruption to the ombudsman.

The NACC are corrupt when it comes to me.

Can't report being drugged and raped to the Ombudsman.

Danny Pearsons office doesn't want a bar of me...

Introduction for the purposes of affidavit and stat Dec dr rich mclean

I demanded help cops kicked in door I was incarcerated & trapped - my possessions were destroyed

Dr. Rich Mclean @ www.killhim.info I Object to The mental health Act and Hospitalisation 24.03.2022

Dr. Rich Mclean Liz Lindberg is from AHRC and she free kicks Million $ in impartial settlement

The Prime Minister and me; the most powerful man and the most vulnerable meet. Who will win?

Dr. Rich Mclean whistleblower statement 04/02/2023

Can't even report being drugged and raped to the ombudsman

02.09.2023 Urgent help needed to intervene in saving my life and liberty

I am forced to rob a petrol station for food and petrol

I really don’t want to have to do this but it comes down to life and death

Dr. Rich Mclean @ www.killhim.info Here is Tim Gos, from AFCA, conspiring at the foot of my death

30.10.2023 JACK VAN BRUMMELEN 148158 NARREE WARREN POLICE STATION DEATH THREAT VIOLENCE REJECTION

Dr. Rich Mclean @ www.killhim.info Im as good as dead lets have fun reporting crime footscray cops

I report Stefan Iasonidis drugged and raped me to police but they refuse acknowledgement

28.05.2023 I call federal police to report corruption and crime - this is why I can't trust police

Dr Rich Mclean - Set up to fail - Corruption at the AAT & Attorney general with Member Fernell

Dr. Rich Mclean @ www.killhim.info Tim Gos of AFCA - determinations to be within 4 weeks not 2 yrs

03.09.2023 I call the NACC after 90 days for my complaint, and they 'reject' me - they are in on it!

17 June 2022

Day after I was violently attacked inside a hospital

Danny Pearsons office doesn't want a bar of me...

Danny Pearsons office doesn't want a bar of me...

Reporting being drugged & raped - police can't guarantee won't be detained under mental health act

SILS FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS

 

The NDIS (National Disability Insurance Scheme) uses a planning process to determine the appropriate funding and supports for individuals, including Supported Independent Living (SIL). While specific checkboxes may not be used in the literal sense, the process involves considering various factors to determine the level of support needed. Here are key considerations for SIL funding:

 

  • Accommodation Needs:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires assistance with accommodation due to their disability. I desperately do.

  • Daily Living Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant needs support with daily living activities such as personal care, meal preparation, and household tasks. I desperately do (when I secure somewhere to live).

  • Complex Support Needs:

  • Checkbox: The participant has complex support needs that necessitate a higher level of assistance. I do. I am the subject of a conspiracy and TI.

  • 24/7 Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires support 24/7 to ensure their safety and well-being. I am under death threats to kill both me and my dog.

  • Medical and Health Requirements:

  • Checkbox: The participant has specific medical or health-related needs that require ongoing support. U do I need a psychiatrist a psychologist a GP a financial counsellor, legal assistance, an advocate, drug and alcohol and social provisions.

  • Community Access:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires assistance in accessing and participating in community activities. I do I need support with everything.

  • Mobility and Transportation:

  • Checkbox: The participant needs support with mobility and transportation, including assistance in getting around. I rely on my support workers now to take me places because I have not got transportation without being victimised by police.

  • Behavioural Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant exhibits behaviours that require specialized support. Yes that is me to a T.

  • Assistive Technology:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires assistive technology to enhance their independence. I require surveillance because of gang stalkers and my privacy being invaded and technological protection from agencies interested in my data and my personal files used to demonstrate corrupt public officials which has been my moral obligation to democracy.

  • Goal and Aspiration Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant has specific goals and aspirations, and the support plan aligns with these objectives. My ndis goals need to be updated as I had no say in them or the words. But my goals are to live a life in a home for my dog and I free from oppression and victimisation from authorities with enough food medicine and health care. Its really only my basic human rights but ion course this is documented to have been shattered and needs urgent investigation.

  • Advocacy and Decision-Making:

  • Checkbox: The participant may require support in advocacy and decision-making processes. I need help with all decision making processes as long as my autonomy and freedom are guaranteed because as we know this tyrannical government rules with impunity and as my suicide attempt illustrates I don’t take to kindly to having my freedoms taken and self destruct to avoid having to act within any constraints and value my ability to critique the powers that be. 

 

I suit all the criteria and with seven hospitalisations in two years and the clear reports and discharge summaries detailing my chronic illnesses it is clear I cannot look after myself alone. In fact it is a miracle I am alive considering the neglect and vilification of me.

An orchestrated campaign of persecution: Gang Stalking and my lifelong financial destruction 

 

Gang stalking refers to a set of harassment tactics, typically conducted by a group of people, against an individual, known as the target or victim. These tactics are often intrusive, relentless, and psychologically distressing. Gang stalking can take various forms, but it usually involves unwanted surveillance, intimidation, and harassment. The perpetrators may be strangers, acquaintances, Government employees or even people known to me.

 

The orchestrated campaign against me has systematically stripped away everything I once had, leaving me in a state of utter vulnerability. This malicious act has not only deprived me of material possessions but has also targeted essential aspects of my life:

 

The low end is gossip, then there is disadvantage, then discrimination and betrayal, then there id public opinion and hypocrisy and on the far end is intimidation destruction violence and murder.

 

Business Loss:
I lost my business, a venture I had invested time, effort, and passion into, leaving me without a source of income and stability.

 

Accreditation Damage:
The malicious actions taken against me have tarnished my professional accreditation, damaging my reputation and hindering my ability to engage in certain activities. The NDIS cancelled my accreditation. 

 

Human Rights Violation:
The deprivation of my human rights has been a deliberate and damaging aspect of the orchestrated campaign, leaving me without the basic rights and protections every individual deserves. I have attached a report that needs to be documented and acknowledged not ignored or pointedly neglected which is a method to delegitimise my story narrative and evidence. That has been torture for me. No more.

 

Access to Legal Representation:
The systematic denial of legal representation has left me without the crucial support needed to navigate the complexities of my situation and seek justice. I am glad I have found someone now I hope he is brave. 

 

Reputation Undermined:
My reputation, painstakingly built over time, has been maliciously targeted, resulting in a distorted public perception that further compounds the challenges I face.

 

Work Cover Manipulation:
The denial or manipulation of work cover has left me without the financial and medical support necessary for recovery and stability. That decision is now proven to be pre determined to fail and illegal.

 

Interference with Insurances:
The interference with my insurance claims has added to the financial strain and further undermined my ability to rebuild. It had a malice to cause me harm and did. 

 

Thwarted Settlements:
Any attempts to secure fair settlements have been systematically thwarted, denying me the compensation and support I am rightfully owed.

 

Deprivation of Fair Treatment:
The campaign has deprived me of fair and impartial treatment, a basic expectation in a just society.

 

Right to Rent a Home Impacted:
The orchestrated campaign has even affected my ability to secure a place to live, making me homeless under the NDIS a brutal betrayal of my human dignity.

 

PID Declarations Rejected:
In addition, my PID declarations have been summarily rejected. Even my attempts to access information through FOI from the OPMC have been thwarted, as they were deemed 'voluminous' and 'complex,' further limiting my ability to assert my rights and seek redress for the injustices I've endured.

 

Unpaid Work Cover Settlements:
Notably, not one but two work cover settlements were never paid, compounding the financial hardships imposed upon me through this campaign.

 

Digital Identity Destruction:
Moreover, Micron21, a government-backed web hosting company, deleted my business website with impunity. This act destroyed my digital identity, and despite cries for help to SBFEO, business.gov, or the TIO, no effective measures were taken to hold them accountable for their actions.

 

HCF Income Protection Refusal and Ban:
HCF further exacerbated my situation by refusing to pay my income protection insurance and subsequently banning me from contacting them, leaving me without critical financial support and avenues for resolution.

Repeated Institutionalization for mental illness and as a Political Prisoner:
Compounding the injustices, I have been incarcerated in an institution seven times in three years, often under dubious circumstances that suggest a pattern of political persecution. This repeated confinement further highlights the systemic abuse and violation of my rights.

 

Mental Health Support Neglected:
Additionally, I am currently without essential mental health support. I lack a psychologist, psychiatrist, and even a general practitioner (GP). Dr. David Horgan, who initially diagnosed me with ADHD and prescribed dexamphetamine as a 'life-saving' treatment, has pointedly neglected to continue this prescription after my first hospitalization in January 2021. This abrupt discontinuation has left me without a vital medication, forcing me to resort to street drugs to replicate the clarity and focus that the prescribed medication provided. Unfortunately, this has given rise to addiction issues, compounding the myriad challenges I face in my pursuit of justice and well-being.

 

Extreme Poverty and Its Consequences:
Furthermore, the recent period of extreme poverty led to dire circumstances, with me living in my car marked as an infamous vagrant. Authorities and police pursued me, adding to the distress. Severe financial constraints compelled me to eat from bins and beg for money. This poverty, by intelligent design, has been disastrous for both my mental and physical health.

 

Bankruptcy Despite Unacknowledged Relationship:
I had to declare bankruptcy in 2021 despite there never being an acknowledgment from any government agency about being in a relationship with my former partner. ASIC was willing to accept my bankruptcy, but they were not willing to accept my evidence of my relationship. That is pure hypocrisy.

 

Ongoing Debts and Ombudsman's Refusal:
Currently, I owe money to drug dealers and many people I have begged help from, totaling about $80,000. I have always wanted to pay back people when my detriments were paid, but I was never paid the detriments, leading to the loss of those people who stepped in to help me financially. The ombudsman has refused my FOI and now refused all future correspondence, adding to the layers of injustice I am facing.

 

NDIS SILS Application and Threat of Harm:
The NDIS provided me with medium-term accommodation from just before Christmas 2023 for the purposes of a SILS application but not for the fact I was living in my car. They have stated that they do not expect my SILS funding to be different this time around, but it is within my rights to ask for it. It is clear other mainstream services have been exhausted in my search for my basic needs met of a home, food, medicine, and healthcare, free from violence and neglect for my dog and me. It is evident that I cannot look after myself after seven hospitalizations and squatting as a drug-addicted vagrant for three years. It is evident I suffer from chronic schizophrenia, ADHD, and an unacknowledged brain disorder. If the CEO of the NDIS finds reason to reject my SILS application, it will indicate that the government does wish me harm, and that she has acted in congruence with an evil conspiracy. Furthermore, she has not the independent thought to criticize the government. If she does this, I will make her accountable.

 

Examples of Gang Stalking Tactics:

 

Surveillance:

Perpetrators may follow the victim, track their movements, or place the target under continuous surveillance. This can include vehicles following the victim, unknown people watching the victim's home, or the use of hidden cameras.

 

Harassment and Stalking: 

The victim may experience persistent, invasive harassment. This can involve stalking by individuals, including cyberstalking, following the victim, and making intimidating phone calls or sending threatening messages.

 

Gaslighting: 

Perpetrators may engage in gaslighting, trying to make the victim doubt their own perceptions, sanity, or memory. They might move objects in the victim's home, leave subtle clues to suggest they are being watched, or manipulate the victim's environment to create a sense of disorientation.

Noise Campaign: Targets may experience a relentless campaign of noise harassment, including loud music, horns, sirens, or other disruptive sounds. This can disrupt the victim's sleep and peace of mind.

 

Cyberbullying: 

Gang stalking can extend into the digital realm. Perpetrators may hack into the victim's accounts, spread false information, or engage in online harassment through social media, emails, or other online platforms.

Vandalism: Targets may find their property vandalized or tampered with, such as slashed tires, damaged vehicles, or defaced personal belongings.

 

Community and Workplace Harassment: 

Perpetrators may attempt to isolate the victim by spreading false rumors, damaging their reputation in their community or workplace, or convincing others to participate in the harassment campaign.

Psychological Effects on Me:

 

Anxiety and Paranoia: 

I have often experienced heightened anxiety, fear, and paranoia as I constantly feel watched and threatened.

 

Isolation: 

The persistent harassment led me to social isolation, as I withdrew from friends and family out of fear or mistrust.

Depression: 

The ongoing stress and emotional toll of gang stalking contributed to feelings of my depression and hopelessness.

 

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): 

I have developed symptoms of PTSD, including flashbacks, nightmares, and hyperarousal, due to the traumatic nature of the stalking.

 

Loss of Privacy: 

Gang stalking invaded my privacy, causing distress and a sense of vulnerability.

 

Physical Health Issues: 

Chronic stress and anxiety has lead to my physical health problems, such as headaches, digestive issues, and sleep disturbances.

 

Deteriorating Mental Health: 

The cumulative effects of gang stalking has had severe consequences on my mental health, leading to psychosis and suicidal thoughts. It's important to note that gang stalking is often associated with delusional disorders, where individuals believe they are being targeted when there is no credible evidence to support such claims. 

 

That is not the case here as I have provided the evidence.

In conclusion, the relentless and disturbing experiences of gang stalking have undeniably taken a severe toll on my mental health, leaving an indelible mark on my well-being. Perpetrators, employing tactics such as surveillance, harassment, gaslighting, noise campaigns, cyberbullying, vandalism, and community and workplace harassment, have subjected me to continuous and invasive attacks.

 

The anxiety, fear, and paranoia instigated by these actions have become constant companions, casting a shadow over my daily life. The persistent feeling of being watched, followed, and targeted has created a profound sense of vulnerability, affecting my overall sense of security.

 

The psychological impact has extended to isolation, as the fear and mistrust sown by the perpetrators led me to withdraw from friends and family. The very fabric of my social connections has been strained, leaving me grappling with feelings of alienation and loneliness.

 

While it may be challenging to pinpoint specific individuals responsible for these acts, the collective impact of this orchestrated campaign has been devastating. The sustained assault on my mental well-being, executed through covert and overt means, leaves me grappling with the enduring effects of this traumatic experience.

 

It is my hope that by shedding light on these tactics and their consequences, awareness can be raised about the insidious nature of gang stalking, fostering understanding and support for those who find themselves ensnared in its web. Moving forward, seeking professional help and building a network of empathetic allies may offer avenues for healing and resilience in the face of this profound psychological assault.

My gang stalking

 

Gang stalking has become an undeniable reality in my life, and I find myself in need of support and assistance to navigate the profound psychological and emotional impact of such relentless harassment. This plea encompasses a fundamental acknowledgment of the trauma I have endured. Regrettably, both the Government and you, on a personal level, appear complicit in my abuse, assuming the roles of perpetrators and gang-stalkers. This acknowledgment is a critical step towards addressing the deeply rooted issues affecting my well-being, considering the severe victimization that has pushed me to the brink of death, only to be revived.

 

It is perplexing to address this protest to you, the very entity I identify as my abuser. Your oversight in witnessing my descent into homelessness, forced to live as a vagrant in my car, raises questions about the responsibilities of those in authority. The urgent need for intervention from mental health professionals and law enforcement has never been more crucial to my well-being.

 

In this perplexing situation, the quest for true justice necessitates a strategic approach. Recognizing my understanding of ethics and the law, I am compelled to triangulate by involving other individuals. Rather than focusing on my recovery and mental health, circumstances have pushed me to strategize my way out of a potentially deadly conspiracy aimed at maiming not just my life but also my prosperity.

 

The inherent contradiction lies in my present necessity to orchestrate a response from opposing factions, a tactic born out of the pressing need for justice and resolution. While ideally, my energy should be directed towards personal recovery, the unfortunate reality is that the opportunity for such focus has been elusive amid the relentless conspiracy that surrounds me.

Therefore, it can be asserted that government tyranny has intentionally exacerbated an already existing vulnerability related to my mental health. This has rendered it virtually impossible to resume work, especially considering I was already on sick leave, making it extremely challenging to function effectively.

Attacking me financially in a covert intelligent politicised and systemic way

 

Removing someone's finances intentionally causes harm, impacting basic needs, shelter, food, healthcare, education, employment, social life, psychological well-being, legal consequences, and overall quality of life. The intentional amplification of a pre-existing mental illness by the government, as exemplified by the NDIS's broken promise, is a grave violation of human rights. Seeking support from social services, community organizations, or legal assistance is crucial for me as I have nothing and no way to recover money - which is how gang stalking and a conspiracy has attacked me.

 

Now you must intervene by eliciting actions from other heads of agencies and influential people or politicians to acknowledge the financial detriments still owed to me I have been unable to recover because of the conspiracy.

 

An acknowledgement of what I am saying backed up with evidence can no longer be delegitimised or pointedly neglected because there is a political and financial process. It is a legal requirement to exhaust mainstream supports before a SILS package is provided to me. 

It will provide me with the vital and necessary support I require (to) for my disability(s).

 

My disabilities are chronic and lifelong.

 

My persecution on a political and systemic level by the Government is conformed and proven with evidence on this page which§h must be acknowledged. My persecution is consciously orchesrated knowingly putting me at risk of suicide from a malicious systemic neglect. SILS will provide reasonable accomodation that satisfies NDIS guidelines.

 

SILS can provide what United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) states in Article 14 – Liberty and security of person that Australia is a signatory to and has ratified in 2008 that:  2. States Parties shall ensure that if persons with disabilities are deprived of their liberty through any process, they are, on an equal basis with others, entitled to guarantees in accordance with international human rights law and shall be treated in compliance with the objectives and principles of the present Convention, including by provision of reasonable accommodation.

 

Regarding statement 2. above it is appreciated and expected that the NDIS acknowledge the proof that I have become a targeted individual of the Australian Government. 

 

Liberty is defined as the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behaviour, or political views. My liberty has been oppressed by the government authorities.  

It needs to be acknowledged that I am a person deprived of my liberty via my political scapegoating and therefore am entitled to guarantees including by provision of reasonable accomodation as per (UNCRPD).

 

The NDIS is required to acknowledge I am a  victim of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and further that the source of persecution and my nemesis IS the Government.  Further that my claimed persecution is not a ‘delusion of persecution’ requiring medicine or hospitalisation but a phenomenon proven below with facts.  These facts collectively render my victimisation which has tortured me

 

NDIS is required to accept that as a statutory authority they are part of a government portfolio that has been informed to treat me differently. The NDIS is already conscious of my documented human rights abuses and been complicit in my continued poverty and persecution.  At the same time the NDIS have obliged to provide some support to me in the provision of my NDIS plan

 

The NDIS needs to acknowledge the hypocrisy of this situation in granting me SILS.

 

SILS accomodation is vital to guarantee support regarding my disability, my well being, my health, my safety and freedom from threats of violence and continued persecution described and proven below.

All avenues of mainstream support have proven to be exhausted in order to provide me accomodation and for the support I need regarding my disability which is directly a reason for my recent homelessness.

 

This is because of a proven conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in which I am a targeted individual of the Australian Government.

It is clear from seven hospitalisations in three years of different locations that I am unable to look after myself and that I have been a risk to myself with suicidal ideation repeatedly.

 

It is clear of my profound disability in which I need accomodation and support because the lack of accomodation is directly relational to my disability.

 

I cannot work because I already suffered a psychological injury at work. I suffered this psychological injury in 2021 relating to a corrupt magistrate and my VOCAT case for my childhood sexualisation / abuse which in hindsight was a corrupt decision to deny my claim. 

 

For reason of financial abuse which deliberately is intended to amplify my vulnerability

 

I have been financially abused for years underpinned by the federal government and all my compensations, determinations, settlements, winnings, other financial windfalls in hindsight being consciously and intentionally redacted from even getting to me and this is due to the fact of never having a lawyer despite searching hard for one. Every decision was made by a party that had access to the law and they were all decided at government agencies which also have access to litigation advice. What can be proven now in hindsight is that this redaction of my prosperity was not merely coincidental to have failed time after time but it had been intelligently designed  by the government to fail for reasoning of me being psychometrically profiled by the government and every attempt at legal help was thwarted.

 

This deliberate redaction of all of my prosperity were all decisions made at government statutory agencies by lawyers who can be bought, corrupt public officials and supported by politicians too afraid to speak up and critique their tyrannical overlords who pay them handsomely to live in luxury and privilege and to never deviate from towing the party line.

 

I feel sorry for them, and the recipients of this letter for being restricted in their critical thinking limited by the powers that pay/bribe them. I do not suffer the same restrictions as you and I never have and I never will.

 

They all were and are decisions that were unethical illegal unbalanced biased immoral and brutally unfair to me. I have never had access to the law and every Government agency has a whole raft of lawyers supporting the department or statutory authorities were doomed to fail for me prior to ‘decisions’ being handed to me.

The list of financial detriments maliciously and consciously redacted from me, this is not just 'bad luck'

 

As you can see is long and it identifies that a massive amount of financial detriment has been redacted from me in a way that has brutally victimised me. Victimisation is against the law.

  1. Unfair termination settlement from the Age newspaper, $300000

  2. Work cover settlement from 2004, $300000

  3. Incorrect TPD payment from 2008, $500000

  4. Medical malpractice settlement in 2017, $300000

  5. HCF income assist settlement in 2021, $750000

  6. Work Cover settlement in 2021, $750000

  7. Provisional payments from work cover 2021, $50000

  8. Business insurance payout 2021, $100000

  9. Former partner settlement, $500000

  10. Settlement for my cognitive brain impairment sustained inside a hospital the they owed a duty of care, $2500000

  11. Sue for my business website maliciously destroyed, $100000,

  12. Claim for loss after my worldly possessions were destroyed, $50000,

  13. Detriments of over 2 million after being banned at AFCA, $20000000,

  14. Detriments of over 1.5 million after insurance settlement was free kicked to opposition at AHRC, $15000000,

  15. Money to pay for my accomodation blocked from arriving at the NDIS/A, $25000,

  16. Child sexual abuse redress from DSS delayed denied deferred, $250000,

  17. VOCAT case for child sexual abuse case cited by magistrate as ‘doomed’, $25000,

  18. VOCAT case for violent affray in which I was hospitalised with broken bones and slashes for intervening and sticking up for a member of the public rejected, $25000

  19. Compensated for being run over by a car (most likely a government vehicle), $50000

  20. Compensation for being violently attacked inside a hospital by a not so undercover government thug, $200000

  21. Compensation for a provable conspiracy to pervert the course of justice causing death, $300000

  22. Compensation for the whitewashing of that tragedy by dozens of high ranking public officials who has a responsibility to act ethically with the public services act, $300000

    The total value of the listed detriments amounts to around $40,975,000.

 

I have attempted to gain compensation at the CDDC scheme for administrative errors of statutory government agencies but was told by the department of finance’s Simon Birmingham that I will never receive compensation from the department of finance. This is indicative of corruption and it is brutally unfair and has an aim not only to take my money but to cause harm to me. The extreme end of harm is murder or killing me, and I have literally already died by suicide in Feb 2021 but was revived from certain death.

 

This was and still is systemic and politicised financial abuse with a malice not to actually directly murder me but still create the conditions via design of my destitution which was known to put me in a position of existential risk of killing myself from the neglect which was an intended neglect by all concerned. The neglect occurred in politicised and systemic ways in decisions by dozens of corrupt public officials who were often de identified through layers of beaurocracy. 

 

 

A neurodegenerative process - poverty being bad for your health

‘He was referred for neuropsychological assessment by Dr Thomas Carlyon-Stewart (HMO,

CMB) for characterisation of his cognitive profile and for diagnostic clarification about the presence of a neurodegenerative process.

 

On the current assessment, Richard's cognitive profile is characterised by variable speed of information processing, reduced verbal new learning and memory, and executive difficulties (including difficulties with planning/organisational skills, self-monitoring and set-shifting). 

 

There are several factors likely to be affecting Richard's performances on current testing, including hishistory of schizophrenia, recent psychotic relapse, ADHD, past history of trauma and methamphetamine dependence (over the past 2-3 years). These factors have likely led to a major decline in his mental health.

Due to his extremely poor insight and judgement as well as his compromised cognitive functioning, Richard remains highly vulnerable to exploitation and misadventure. Based on the current assessment findings, an NDIS plan review is strongly supported to advocate for additional funding to assist with Richard's care needs. More specifically, he will need assistance with domestic tasks (cleaning, laundry, shopping and meal preparation), social engagement and community access. His care needs will be most appropriately met in supported accommodation.

 

Richard has an existing NDIS plan, however, due to the change of circumstances, I strongly recommend an NDIS plan review meeting to consider and include the following additional supports of his new NDIS plan:

 

Increasing one-to-one support workers: Richard will benefit from having additional hours of support workers who have experience working with people with mental health conditions. This will help him engage in community activities of his interest.

Occupational Therapy input (Improved Daily Living funding): Richard requires Improved Daily Living funding for Occupational Therapy or support a successful transition, provide training and support to staff. He will also benefit from having an OT functional capacity assessment.’

Character assassination of me:

 

Spreading False Rumors:

Creating and spreading false information about an individual, such as engaging in illegal activities, engaging in immoral behavior, or having a fabricated personal history.

Manipulating Social Media:

Using fake accounts or bots to spread negative information, rumors, or misleading narratives about the targeted individual on social media platforms.

Leaking Personal Information:

Disclosing private and sensitive information, such as personal documents, emails, or compromising photos, without consent to damage the individual's reputation.

Fabricating Incriminating Evidence:

Creating false documents, photos, or videos to make it appear as if the individual has engaged in illegal or immoral activities.

Selective Editing:

Taking statements out of context or selectively editing audio and video recordings to distort the meaning of what the individual said or did.

Anonymous Smear Campaigns:

Initiating smear campaigns through anonymous letters, emails, or websites to attack the individual without revealing the identity of the source.

Infiltrating Personal Relationships:

Planting individuals or informants in the target's social circles to gather information and create situations that can be used against them.

False Accusations:

Making baseless accusations of serious wrongdoing, such as criminal activity, without any evidence to support the claims.

Employment Sabotage:

Sabotaging the individual's professional life by spreading false information to employers, colleagues, or clients, potentially leading to job loss or professional damage.

Cyberbullying:

Engaging in online harassment, including sending threatening messages, creating defamatory content, or encouraging others to do the same.

Gaslighting:

Manipulating the individual's perception of reality to make them doubt their own experiences, sanity, or credibility.

It's crucial to emphasize that engaging in character assassination is not only morally wrong but can also lead to legal consequences, including defamation lawsuits. Ethical behavior involves addressing concerns through legitimate means, respecting the rights of individuals, and upholding principles of fairness and justice.

 

Vilify me with an already existing and publicly described mental illness whether it is active and present or not which in effect weaponises my former brave narrative detailing my vulnerabilities and exclude and delegitimise every other socio political factor and evidence relating to my case.

 

It is important to clarify that any attempt to vilify me for their mental illness, especially for the purpose of punishment or retaliation, is unethical and illegal. I have rights to privacy, and stigmatizing or weaponizing mental health conditions is not only harmful but goes against ethical principles and legal protections.

 

Vilification for and amplification of mental illness

 

Here are the unethical ways health authorities and individuals and the government have vilified me for my mental illness:

Selective Disclosure:

Deliberately highlighting and exaggerating specific aspects of the individual's mental health history, taking them out of context to create a distorted and negative narrative.

False Documentation:

Creating fabricated documents or reports that falsely represent the severity of the individual's mental health condition or imply dangerous behavior.

Anonymous Tips:

Sending anonymous tips to health authorities or law enforcement, alleging erratic or harmful behavior by the individual without any factual basis.

Infiltration of Support Networks:

Planting individuals within the individual's support network to gather information or spread misinformation that contributes to a negative perception of their mental health.

 

Selective Reporting:

Media outlets or online platforms selectively reporting on incidents related to the individual's mental health, emphasizing negative aspects and downplaying any positive or mitigating factors.

 

Psychological Manipulation:

Engaging in gaslighting or psychological manipulation to make the individual doubt their own mental health stability, contributing to a narrative of instability.

 

Institutional Gaslighting:

Health authorities or institutions dismissing the individual's claims of corruption or injustice as symptoms of their mental illness, thereby discrediting their concerns.

 

Coercive Interventions:

Encouraging individuals close to the person to stage interventions or involuntary commitments under the guise of concern for their well-being, when the true motivation is punitive or suppressive.

 

It's crucial to reiterate that these actions are not ethical, and they may violate privacy laws and human rights. In reality, mental health conditions should be approached with empathy, understanding, and adherence to ethical guidelines that prioritize the well-being and rights of the individual. In cases where someone believes they are being targeted unfairly, seeking legal advice and support is recommended.

 

If they can't silence me they will incarcerate me in an asylum or force my suicide via neglect or put me in jail. They would do this by framing me with crime that I have already admitted to or that I felt I has at least a fraction of accountability for or frame me with any crime they can by intelligent design that has an intention of stitching me up and putting me in jail. 

 

If this happened it would be an incredible injustice and hypocrisy that victimises me who is already a victim and would likely not acknowledge the profound amount of crime and detriment dealt to me systemically and politically. The has been committed by police and by public officials and by lawyers and by politicians in decisions insulated that de identifies them in smoke and mirrors of bureaucracy.

SILS can provide what United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) states in Article 14 – Liberty and security of person that Australia is a signatory to and has ratified in 2008 that:  2. States Parties shall ensure that if persons with disabilities are deprived of their liberty through any process, they are, on an equal basis with others, entitled to guarantees in accordance with international human rights law and shall be treated in compliance with the objectives and principles of the present Convention, including by provision of reasonable accommodation.

 

Regarding statement 2. above it is appreciated and expected that the NDIS acknowledge the proof that I have become a targeted individual of the Australian Government. 

 

Liberty is defined as the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behaviour, or political views. My liberty has been oppressed by the government authorities.  

Right to the top the prime minister

 

The Prime Minister and me; the most powerful man and the most vulnerable meet. Who will win?

 

The Office of Prime Minister and Cabinet rejected a cited 'voluminous' and 'complex' Freedom of Information (FOI) request by claiming no documents exist or can't be found. This is not only a blatant lie but corruption at the highest level. Human-made law, as stated in the Bible, is susceptible to corruption, leading to a brutal miscarriage of justice. This deceit delegitimizes my story and narrative, mirroring the malevolent psychological abuse narcissists employ to torment their victims.

 

Iasonidis, a narcissist, has manipulated an entire government, with even the Prime Minister acting as a willing minion. Their apparent desire for me to 'not exist' nearly came true with my suicide attempt. It was induced with 'no-touch torture,' allowing everyone to escape liability by blaming my mental health. The Werribee Mercy Hospital FOI labeled it a 'fatal' and 'lethal' attempt, now covered up, contributing to the abandonment of duty of care and the cognitive detriment I currently endure.

 

Contrary to popular belief, mental illness wasn't the cause of my suicide attempt. It resulted from deceit, lies, conspiracy, financial abuse, family violence, cover-up, corruption, and judgments, with vilification for mental illness eclipsing all other factors. This ongoing gang stalking, evident since 1995, led to my tragedy. The same victimization and persecution continued even after I survived, shaping a personal socio-political climate that remains private yet very public.

 

Why am I demanding Supported Independent Living (SILS) from the NDIS amidst numerous other battles lost? This battle is winnable because I can demonstrate that the rejection of my SILS was part of the politicized systemic persecution I speak of. It's clear that gang stalking and no-touch torture are real, accompanied by a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice—all decisions centered around financial motives.

 

Granting SILS would not only provide the home and support I desperately need but also address human rights abuses. It would acknowledge the NDIS's role in subjecting me to blows orchestrated by external agencies and individuals through a proxy attack. By articulating this, I make the NDIS CEO consciously aware that I recognize her sins and judgments. I acknowledge she mistreated me, possibly leading to neglect-induced suicide.

 

You must acknowledge that you can't criticize the orchestrators of my demise due to your role as a public office. Your refusal or rejection of a valid compromise, offering basic human rights and care, not compensation for my life's enormous suffering, will lead me to hold you accountable. I won't inflict harm the way dozens of public officials sustain the harm happening to me via poverty on my health and well being but I will expose your hypocrisy and challenge your role as the NDIS CEO, part of the statutory agencies where my reputation precedes me, distorted by misguided human judgments.

Fighting proven government tyranny

 

In the absence of legal representation only in the past but not now, I find myself compelled to address the dire circumstances I face as a failed whistleblower, left unprotected and vulnerable to attacks on my prosperity, care, and welfare. Yesterday's incident with the NDIS serves as a stark example of the systemic challenges I confront daily. The lack of a lawyer, contrary to the Charter of People with Disability, has resulted in substantial financial losses, potentially exceeding 40 million dollars. 

 

Proxy attacks on my possessions, including the destruction of my business website, have contributed to profound financial detriment. This is intricately linked to the non-acknowledgment of my former partner and my relationship—an aspect no government agency is willing to admit exists. In a desperate bid for survival amid family violence and financial abuse, I resorted to actions like defrauding the NDIS using my former partner's name, an issue the NDIS refuses to investigate to avoid exposing a larger conspiracy. The subsequent police persecution forced me into vagrancy, culminating in a life-threatening incident where authorities created conditions making it impossible for police attendance. The NDIS, an agency under the federal government, has played a role in not only robbing me of money but also causing deliberate harm, as evident in recent actions leaving me homeless. 

 

With legal representation now secured, I will hold the NDIS and you personally accountable for the orchestrated injustices and demand proper consideration for my SILS application from here on in. I implore you, Rebecca, to reflect on the ethical responsibility you have in assisting people with disabilities, rather than perpetuating the enormous injustices I've endured. Failure to secure SILS will be perceived as further systemic abuse, leading to legal actions to seek redress and justice. My resolve is unyielding, and even in the face of adversity, I stand determined to expose tyranny and fight for the benefit of future generations.

 

SILS FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS I QUALIFY FOR ALL OF THEM

 

The NDIS (National Disability Insurance Scheme) uses a planning process to determine the appropriate funding and supports for individuals, including Supported Independent Living (SIL). While specific checkboxes may not be used in the literal sense, the process involves considering various factors to determine the level of support needed. Here are key considerations for SIL funding:

 

  • Accommodation Needs:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires assistance with accommodation due to their disability. I desperately do.

  • Daily Living Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant needs support with daily living activities such as personal care, meal preparation, and household tasks. I desperately do (when I secure somewhere to live).

  • Complex Support Needs:

  • Checkbox: The participant has complex support needs that necessitate a higher level of assistance. I do. I am the subject of a conspiracy and TI.

  • 24/7 Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires support 24/7 to ensure their safety and well-being. I am under death threats to kill both me and my dog.

  • Medical and Health Requirements:

  • Checkbox: The participant has specific medical or health-related needs that require ongoing support. U do I need a psychiatrist a psychologist a GP a financial counsellor, legal assistance, an advocate, drug and alcohol and social provisions.

  • Community Access:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires assistance in accessing and participating in community activities. I do I need support with everything.

  • Mobility and Transportation:

  • Checkbox: The participant needs support with mobility and transportation, including assistance in getting around. I rely on my support workers now to take me places because I have not got transportation without being victimised by police.

  • Behavioural Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant exhibits behaviours that require specialized support. Yes that is me to a T.

  • Assistive Technology:

  • Checkbox: The participant requires assistive technology to enhance their independence. I require surveillance because of gang stalkers and my privacy being invaded and technological protection from agencies interested in my data and my personal files used to demonstrate corrupt public officials which has been my moral obligation to democracy.

  • Goal and Aspiration Support:

  • Checkbox: The participant has specific goals and aspirations, and the support plan aligns with these objectives. My ndis goals need to be updated as I had no say in them or the words. But my goals are to live a life in a home for my dog and I free from oppression and victimisation from authorities with enough food medicine and health care. Its really only my basic human rights but ion course this is documented to have been shattered and needs urgent investigation.

  • Advocacy and Decision-Making:

  • Checkbox: The participant may require support in advocacy and decision-making processes. I need help with all decision making processes as long as my autonomy and freedom are guaranteed because as we know this tyrannical government rules with impunity and as my suicide attempt illustrates I don’t take to kindly to having my freedoms taken and self destruct to avoid having to act within any constraints and value my ability to critique the powers that be. 

 

I suit all the criteria and with seven hospitalisations in two years and the clear reports and discharge summaries detailing my chronic illnesses it is clear I cannot look after myself alone. In fact it is a miracle I am alive considering the neglect and vilification of me.

Fighting a systemic and politicised government tyranny victimising me

 

In the absence of legal representation only in the past but not now, I find myself compelled to address the dire circumstances I face as a failed whistleblower, left unprotected and vulnerable to attacks on my prosperity, care, and welfare. Yesterday's incident with the NDIS serves as a stark example of the systemic challenges I confront daily. The lack of a lawyer, contrary to the Charter of People with Disability, has resulted in substantial financial losses, potentially exceeding 40 million dollars. 

 

Proxy attacks on my possessions, including the destruction of my business website, have contributed to profound financial detriment. This is intricately linked to the non-acknowledgment of my former partner and my relationship—an aspect no government agency is willing to admit exists. In a desperate bid for survival amid family violence and financial abuse, I resorted to actions like defrauding the NDIS using my former partner's name, an issue the NDIS refuses to investigate to avoid exposing a larger conspiracy. The subsequent police persecution forced me into vagrancy, culminating in a life-threatening incident where authorities created conditions making it impossible for police attendance. The NDIS, an agency under the federal government, has played a role in not only robbing me of money but also causing deliberate harm, as evident in recent actions leaving me homeless. 

 

With legal representation now secured, I will hold the NDIS and you personally accountable for the orchestrated injustices and demand proper consideration for my SILS application from here on in. I implore you, Rebecca, to reflect on the ethical responsibility you have in assisting people with disabilities, rather than perpetuating the enormous injustices I've endured. Failure to secure SILS will be perceived as further systemic abuse, leading to legal actions to seek redress and justice. My resolve is unyielding, and even in the face of adversity, I stand determined to expose tyranny and fight for the benefit of future generations.

A covert and intelligent orchestrated campaign of persecution:

 

The orchestrated campaign against me has systematically stripped away everything I once had, leaving me in a state of utter vulnerability. This malicious act has not only deprived me of material possessions but has also targeted essential aspects of my life:

 

The low end is gossip, then there is disadvantage, then discrimination and betrayal, then there id public opinion and hypocrisy and on the far end is intimidation destruction violence and murder.

 

Business Loss:
I lost my business, a venture I had invested time, effort, and passion into, leaving me without a source of income and stability.

 

Accreditation Damage:
The malicious actions taken against me have tarnished my professional accreditation, damaging my reputation and hindering my ability to engage in certain activities. The NDIS cancelled my accreditation. 

 

Human Rights Violation:
The deprivation of my human rights has been a deliberate and damaging aspect of the orchestrated campaign, leaving me without the basic rights and protections every individual deserves. I have attached a report that needs to be documented and acknowledged not ignored or pointedly neglected which is a method to delegitimise my story narrative and evidence. That has been torture for me. No more.

 

Access to Legal Representation:
The systematic denial of legal representation has left me without the crucial support needed to navigate the complexities of my situation and seek justice. I am glad I have found someone now I hope he is brave. 

 

Reputation Undermined:
My reputation, painstakingly built over time, has been maliciously targeted, resulting in a distorted public perception that further compounds the challenges I face.

 

Work Cover Manipulation:
The denial or manipulation of work cover has left me without the financial and medical support necessary for recovery and stability. That decision is now proven to be pre determined to fail and illegal.

 

Interference with Insurances:
The interference with my insurance claims has added to the financial strain and further undermined my ability to rebuild. It had a malice to cause me harm and did. 

 

Thwarted Settlements:
Any attempts to secure fair settlements have been systematically thwarted, denying me the compensation and support I am rightfully owed.

 

Deprivation of Fair Treatment:
The campaign has deprived me of fair and impartial treatment, a basic expectation in a just society.

 

Right to Rent a Home Impacted:
The orchestrated campaign has even affected my ability to secure a place to live, making me homeless under the NDIS a brutal betrayal of my human dignity.

 

PID Declarations Rejected:
In addition, my PID declarations have been summarily rejected. Even my attempts to access information through FOI from the OPMC have been thwarted, as they were deemed 'voluminous' and 'complex,' further limiting my ability to assert my rights and seek redress for the injustices I've endured.

 

Unpaid Work Cover Settlements:
Notably, not one but two work cover settlements were never paid, compounding the financial hardships imposed upon me through this campaign.

 

Digital Identity Destruction:
Moreover, Micron21, a government-backed web hosting company, deleted my business website with impunity. This act destroyed my digital identity, and despite cries for help to SBFEO, business.gov, or the TIO, no effective measures were taken to hold them accountable for their actions.

 

HCF Income Protection Refusal and Ban:
HCF further exacerbated my situation by refusing to pay my income protection insurance and subsequently banning me from contacting them, leaving me without critical financial support and avenues for resolution.

Repeated Institutionalization for mental illness and as a Political Prisoner:
Compounding the injustices, I have been incarcerated in an institution seven times in three years, often under dubious circumstances that suggest a pattern of political persecution. This repeated confinement further highlights the systemic abuse and violation of my rights.

 

Mental Health Support Neglected:
Additionally, I am currently without essential mental health support. I lack a psychologist, psychiatrist, and even a general practitioner (GP). Dr. David Horgan, who initially diagnosed me with ADHD and prescribed dexamphetamine as a 'life-saving' treatment, has pointedly neglected to continue this prescription after my first hospitalization in January 2021. This abrupt discontinuation has left me without a vital medication, forcing me to resort to street drugs to replicate the clarity and focus that the prescribed medication provided. Unfortunately, this has given rise to addiction issues, compounding the myriad challenges I face in my pursuit of justice and well-being.

 

Extreme Poverty and Its Consequences:
Furthermore, the recent period of extreme poverty led to dire circumstances, with me living in my car marked as an infamous vagrant. Authorities and police pursued me, adding to the distress. Severe financial constraints compelled me to eat from bins and beg for money. This poverty, by intelligent design, has been disastrous for both my mental and physical health.

 

Bankruptcy Despite Unacknowledged Relationship:
I had to declare bankruptcy in 2021 despite there never being an acknowledgment from any government agency about being in a relationship with my former partner. ASIC was willing to accept my bankruptcy, but they were not willing to accept my evidence of my relationship. That is pure hypocrisy.

 

Ongoing Debts and Ombudsman's Refusal:
Currently, I owe money to drug dealers and many people I have begged help from, totaling about $80,000. I have always wanted to pay back people when my detriments were paid, but I was never paid the detriments, leading to the loss of those people who stepped in to help me financially. The ombudsman has refused my FOI and now refused all future correspondence, adding to the layers of injustice I am facing.

 

NDIS SILS Application and Threat of Harm:
The NDIS provided me with medium-term accommodation from just before Christmas 2023 for the purposes of a SILS application but not for the fact I was living in my car. They have stated that they do not expect my SILS funding to be different this time around, but it is within my rights to ask for it. It is clear other mainstream services have been exhausted in my search for my basic needs met of a home, food, medicine, and healthcare, free from violence and neglect for my dog and me. It is evident that I cannot look after myself after seven hospitalizations and squatting as a drug-addicted vagrant for three years. It is evident I suffer from chronic schizophrenia, ADHD, and an unacknowledged brain disorder. If the CEO of the NDIS finds reason to reject my SILS application, it will indicate that the government does wish me harm, and that she has acted in congruence with an evil conspiracy. Furthermore, she has not the independent thought to criticize the government. If she does this, I will make her accountable.

 

 

Lifelong financial destruction - the removal of power via gang stalking

 

Gang stalking refers to a set of harassment tactics, typically conducted by a group of people, against an individual, known as the target or victim. These tactics are often intrusive, relentless, and psychologically distressing. Gang stalking can take various forms, but it usually involves unwanted surveillance, intimidation, and harassment. The perpetrators may be strangers, acquaintances, Government employees or even people known to me.

 

Examples of Gang Stalking Tactics:

 

Surveillance:

Perpetrators may follow the victim, track their movements, or place the target under continuous surveillance. This can include vehicles following the victim, unknown people watching the victim's home, or the use of hidden cameras.

 

Harassment and Stalking: 

The victim may experience persistent, invasive harassment. This can involve stalking by individuals, including cyberstalking, following the victim, and making intimidating phone calls or sending threatening messages.

 

Gaslighting: 

Perpetrators may engage in gaslighting, trying to make the victim doubt their own perceptions, sanity, or memory. They might move objects in the victim's home, leave subtle clues to suggest they are being watched, or manipulate the victim's environment to create a sense of disorientation.

Noise Campaign:

Targets may experience a relentless campaign of noise harassment, including loud music, horns, sirens, or other disruptive sounds. This can disrupt the victim's sleep and peace of mind.

 

Cyberbullying: 

Gang stalking can extend into the digital realm. Perpetrators may hack into the victim's accounts, spread false information, or engage in online harassment through social media, emails, or other online platforms.

Vandalism: Targets may find their property vandalized or tampered with, such as slashed tires, damaged vehicles, or defaced personal belongings.

 

Community and Workplace Harassment: 

Perpetrators may attempt to isolate the victim by spreading false rumors, damaging their reputation in their community or workplace, or convincing others to participate in the harassment campaign.

Psychological Effects on Me:

 

Anxiety and Paranoia: 

I have often experienced heightened anxiety, fear, and paranoia as I constantly feel watched and threatened.

 

Isolation: 

The persistent harassment led me to social isolation, as I withdrew from friends and family out of fear or mistrust.

Depression: 

The ongoing stress and emotional toll of gang stalking contributed to feelings of my depression and hopelessness.

 

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): 

I have developed symptoms of PTSD, including flashbacks, nightmares, and hyperarousal, due to the traumatic nature of the stalking.

 

Loss of Privacy: 

Gang stalking invaded my privacy, causing distress and a sense of vulnerability.

 

Physical Health Issues: 

Chronic stress and anxiety has lead to my physical health problems, such as headaches, digestive issues, and sleep disturbances.

 

Deteriorating Mental Health: 

The cumulative effects of gang stalking has had severe consequences on my mental health, leading to psychosis and suicidal thoughts.

 

It's important to note that gang stalking is often associated with delusional disorders, where individuals believe they are being targeted when there is no credible evidence to support such claims. 

 

That is not the case here as I have provided the evidence.

 

Gang stalking has occurred to me and is my reality, and I require support and assistance to cope with the psychological and emotional impact of such harassment. That includes an acknowledgement that it has occurred. The Government, and you personally, are complicit in my abuse and so therefore are a government and you as an individual person - who are my perpetrators and gang-stalkers. In these situation providing help from mental health professionals and law enforcement is now crucial for my well-being who has been brutally victimised to the point of death yet revived. How is it possible I am protesting my treatment to you in this letter when it is you who is my abuser? After all you oversaw me becoming a vagrant living as a homeless person in my car. The answer lies in true justice and triangulation of utilising other people. I have understood ethics andf also the law, and now it time for me now that everyone is opposed to me to pit one faction against the next faction and elicit the response. I of course shouldnt be plotting my way out of a deadly consopiracy aimed at maiming me my life and prosperity I should be focussing on recovery and my mental health but there has not been the opportunity for that.

 

It can be said therefore that a government tyranny has intentionally amplified an already existing vulnerability of my mental illness. Its left it impossible to work when I was already on sick leave and almost impossible to functyion.

 

Attacking me in the money

 

Removing someone's finances intentionally causes harm, impacting basic needs, shelter, food, healthcare, education, employment, social life, psychological well-being, legal consequences, and overall quality of life. The intentional amplification of a pre-existing mental illness by the government, as exemplified by the NDIS's broken promise, is a grave violation of human rights. Seeking support from social services, community organizations, or legal assistance is crucial for me as I have nothing and no way to recover money - which is how gang stalking and a conspiracy has attacked me.

 

Now you must intervene by eliciting actions from other heads of agencies and influential people or politicians to acknowledge the financial detriments still owed to me I have been unable to recover because of the conspiracy.

 

An acknowledgement of what I am saying backed up with evidence can no longer be delegitimised or pointedly neglected because there is a political and financial process. It is a legal requirement to exhaust mainstream supports before a SILS package is provided to me. 

 

IF those were to fail, there are compelling reasons for my SILS:

 

The compelling reasons for my SILS request include: 

 

The urgent need for Supported Independent Living (SILS) is evident as all other avenues have been exhausted, leaving me in dire circumstances.

 

  • Brain Injury:
    As documented in Werribee Mercy Hospital records, the degeneration resulting from a suicide attempt is a consequence of the brain injury I sustained during a period of "no-touch torture" inflicted by the government.

 

  • Mental Illness:
    My pre-existing mental illness has been weaponized, aggravating my condition and making me more vulnerable to the challenges I face.

 

  • Safety Concerns:
    I do not feel safe due to threats on my life, including the specific threat made by Stefan Iasonidis against my dog and Crystal. The government's failure to acknowledge certain aspects of my life has marked me as a targeted individual, exposing me to ongoing threats.

 

  • No Touch Torture and Targeted Individual Status:
    The government's systemic and politicized application of "no-touch torture" has left me a targeted individual, impacting my mental health and overall well-being.

 

  • Legal and Family Issues:
    Legal troubles, such as an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) from my mother and blacklisting by other blood relatives, contribute to the challenges I face in maintaining stability.

 

  • Human Rights Abuses:
    Documented instances of human rights abuses, victimization, oppression, and being a scapegoat further highlight the urgency of addressing my situation.

 

The recent NDIS torture chamber and redaction of a home

 

By the way  on 03.01.2024 Carole inadvertently confirms without knowing she was recorded that she has an ID of a conversation with the NDIS stating my recent funding for accomodation was in addition to and not included in my plan. To go back on your word like that is am brutal way to drain my funds immediately and force me to homelessness and the ndia is well aware of this financial abuse and decision with which would cause me immeasurable detriment.

I am becoming more educated and aware, and I refuse to tolerate further injustice or financial detriment. I will not endure the brutality of 'no-touch torture' any longer. My human dignity will not be assaulted. It is a stark embarrassment to the NDIS, the government, and you personally that my recent experience as a homeless vagrant living in my car was consciously intended for me. The NDIS condoned this neglect and contributed to it in a way that cleverly escaped liability for my profound detriment. It was a systemic and political effort, wherein powerful public officials like yourself have been unable to alter the government's mantra of destroying me.

 

Even if you wanted to speak out against the profound corruption and the unholy victimization I have endured, which has led to my current state, you cannot. This is because you are employed by the tyrannical government that persecutes me, and you are obliged never to criticize them. I believe that persecution and vilification, whether I am considered mad or not, have been ongoing issues for me ever since the publication of my human rights-awarded autobiography detailing my experience with schizophrenia.

 

You must act in a way which legitimises my evidence and elicits a solution to my homelessness and support. Failure to do this in in breach of NDIS principles and human decency.

Fraud of the NDIS by me - a standoff for prosecution

I defrauded the NDIS of thousands of dollars. I admit it and admitted it. I was forced to reclaim any prosperity I had off the Government because it was the Government who had protected Iasonidis and destroyed my fair settlement and systemically framed me at all other agencies and I was desperate to keep a roof over my head and food in my belly. You are absolutely aware of this. Yet to criminalise ME for doing this as a single person for prosperity that was MEANT FOR ME ANYWAY whilst dozens ofd lawyers public officials and politicians towed the party line of my destruction in their corruption and criminality would be an audacious miscarriage of justice and would reek of hypocrisy.

 

Here is how I did it: (to come)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You won’t investigate me though nor press charged because it will reveal the complicity of a murderous government conspiracy that you are complicit in. I want you to charge me with fraud. I want my day in court to blow this whole fucking thing out of the water. I dare you. Arrest me!

 

 

I am a targeted individual and a victim of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. I have been subject to brutal torture, financial redaction over two decades, character assassination, and even an attempted suicide. The calculated suppression of my prosperity, amounting to millions, is evident in the documented instances of financial persecution that I have identified.

 

The money that never arrived:

 

In my pursuit of justice, I have engaged legal representation to document the systemic nature of my persecution. I now extend an offer to you to engage other individuals and statutory agencies to elicit responses that could bring about meaningful change in my circumstances. This proactive approach aims to negate the necessity for SILS, aligning with NDIS protocol and legislation.

 

As I navigate this persecution to the highest echelons of authority, where meaningful change is yet to be enacted, I implore you to challenge your peers in other agencies and organizations to fulfill their obligations to me. This strategic approach is designed to elicit compensation from sources beyond the NDIS portfolio, effecting a significant improvement in my financial health.

 

The extensive evidence provided in this letter sheds light on the concept of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, unfairly victimizing me. It demonstrates that this is not a delusion but a provable phenomenon backed by substantial evidence. I believe this matter should be elevated to the High Court, acknowledging that different statutory agencies and public officials will need to be cross-referenced to bring about meaningful change in my circumstances.

 

Moreover, I bring to your attention the evidence supporting my contention of 'no-touch torture,' which led to my suicide attempt. Despite being cited in a hospital FOI as a 'fatal' injury from which I was revived, the NDIS has dismissed this crucial information, and I am yet to receive a response or acknowledgment of this tragedy.

 

I urge you to conduct the investigation obligated by the NDIS code of conduct in your role at the NDIA. This investigation is crucial for my well-being, welfare, and imminent risk to health and safety, as documented in a federal court document that rejects my PID yet describes the imminent threat to my person. A thorough examination of my documented human rights abuses will eventually lead to an acknowledgment of my suffered detriment, for which I should be rightfully compensated.

 

In conclusion, I seek your immediate attention to rectify the injustices I have faced and to ensure that the NDIS upholds its commitment to providing support to individuals in need. I anticipate a prompt and meaningful response to initiate positive change in my circumstances.

 

Further it doesn't matter that the attorney general or Prime Minister have delegitimised by story and narrative and neglected to act and also its not possible for you not to act now even though I am a targeted individual of the Australian Government right up at ASIO and beyond level. 

 

As the CEO of the NDIS tasked with the duty of caring for marginalised people with a disability of who I am one, it is within your remit of your role and also for being a decent human being.

 

Whatever the reason for my scapegoating, either Ive done drugs, had regretful sex, am bat shit crazy, am gay, or I recorded something to check if its real, otherwise it is simply not permissible now that I be left homeless as a brain damaged schizophrenia man with ADHD in this country we call Australia which of course is a democracy. 

 

Within my freedoms in this country I have advocated independently and strongly for people with disabilities and their carers all over this country in person and on radio and TV and even in Parliament house, Canberra.

 

I can tell you the level and sense of betrayal from a country I aimed to leave a better place than when I came to it is brutal and borders on a biblical forsaking.

 

Can you tell five eyes to alo call off the V2K in my house and across electronic devices which of course can easily be turned into listening devices with simple understanding of electronics?

 

Sincerely,

 

Barran Resonance Dodger. (The dead Dr Richard McLean).

bottom of page