09.02.2024 Letter

In the realm of power and privilege, a covert conspiracy has unleashed chaos upon an unsuspecting individual, leaving behind a trail of financial abuse, human rights violations, and a glaring absence of legal support. Today, I break the silence, not as a victim, but as a warrior seeking allies in the battle against an insidious force that thrives on injustice. Urgently, I seek financial assistance to engage a criminal lawyer for my impending sentencing related to the charge of making threats to kill. I approach the court with due respect, recognizing the potential complicity in my ongoing political persecution, aligned with a proven conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

I willingly admit guilt to making the threat, acknowledging the evidence in its standalone fact. However, I implore the court to consider the underlying circumstances—my victimization, oppression, rehabilitative character established over the years, and the intentions behind seeking justice. A comprehensive plan, demonstrating that I pose no threat to myself or others, and a commitment to contribute positively to society, should be paramount in the court's considerations.

I now possess the means to effectively showcase the socio-political, medical, and mental health factors that should satisfy the court of my genuine remorse. I present a comprehensive plan illustrating how it would be more beneficial for me to serve society, particularly the most marginalized, in a meaningful way. This approach would result in the most positive benefit for all.

Instead of opting for incarceration for the indictable offense, which would only serve to further victimize me and stifle my intended contributions to society, I propose an alternative that aligns with my demonstrated commitment of over thirty years in altruism as an advocate and peaceful human rights campaigner.

The rushed statement stemmed from emotional desperation, fueled by systemic neglect, avoidable drug dependence due to the lack of ADHD medication, and a month-long struggle as a homeless vagrant living in my car. If the threat, even remotely real, it was communicated to IBAC and the Commonwealth Ombudsman, it was delivered to underscore its lack of substance and impossibility, serving as a method to explicitly garner a reaction to profound frustration from being delegitimized and victimized systematically and politically over the years. The same email incredibly provided the solution to my financial destruction and my political impasse for which I am victimised as a targeted individual.

Expressing profound regret for any hurt caused, I plead guilty to the charge on the condition I can read this to appeal for an opportunity to demonstrate my sincere remorse and present tangible evidence of plans for future contributions to society. Given this chance, I am hopeful to convince the judge that my singular innocuous threat is a result of the exclusion of socio-political, monetary, human, and legal rights considerations and right obligated to me by the government under the UN human rights charter of persons with a disability, and express my profound remorse for the entreaty.

Looking forward, I aim not only to be a responsible and resilient member of society but also a human rights warrior with a proven record of selflessness and ethical responsibility. My advocacy for over thirty years has been marked by intelligence and goodwill, qualities that still guide me. I intend to transform my suffering into positive change, advocating for the marginalized, the mentally ill, the colored, women, children, the differently-abled, and even convicted criminals seeking redemption. 

I will need to do this by proving the almost impossible: That a conspiracy aims to harm me, has done so, and has acted to silence me critiquing the government via this sentencing which identified a throw away innocuous threat excluding every single other politicked and financial and human and legal rights issue that has affected my person.

I am Dr. Rich McLean, unintentionally at the epicenter of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, yet resilient in my pursuit of justice, dignity, and a basic existence. As I pen these words, I earnestly hope for the opportunity to present factual evidence of the torture, human rights abuses, and ill treatment I have endured. The nature of this hearing may be complicit in these issues, with the cooperation of the police, who have also neglected to identify the very same threats that have occurred against me.

It is crucial to note that the threat against me was made by a person proven to be a tax fraud, a former drug trafficker who admitted to being present at murders. Additionally, he basically sexually assaulted me after drugging me with substances obtained from the street alongside prescription medication sourced from his colleagues, the evidence of which he left on my computer.

As a distinguished autobiographer, artist, and academic holding a Ph.D. in narrative inquiry and post-humanism, my journey spans over three decades of relentless advocacy for marginalized communities. From Dubbo to Warrnambool, Sydney to Melbourne, and even within the hallowed halls of Parliament House in Canberra, I have spoken passionately on local, state, national, and international platforms—both in person and through numerous appearances on radio and TV. However, my commitment to non-violent protest, using the potency of words to challenge societal stigmas, particularly those associated with mental illness, has marked me as a target of a systemic and politicized movement, systematically unraveling every facet of my existence.

Despite the stigmas surrounding my diagnosis of schizophrenia, I persevered and put in herculean effort to climb beyond it, ultimately earning a merit-based Ph.D. and the distinction of a doctorate that attests to critical thought.

Earning a merit-based Ph.D. and successfully completing it despite a diagnosis of schizophrenia reflects several commendable qualities in an individual:

Determination and Perseverance: Overcoming the challenges associated with schizophrenia requires a high level of determination and the ability to persist in the face of adversity.

Intellectual Capability: Achieving a Ph.D. indicates a strong intellectual capacity and aptitude for advanced academic work, showcasing the individual's ability to engage in complex and critical thinking.

Work Ethic: The pursuit of a Ph.D. demands a rigorous work ethic, including disciplined research, study, and academic writing. This work ethic is essential for success in the face of personal challenges.

Resilience: Individuals with schizophrenia who attain a Ph.D. often demonstrate resilience, bouncing back from setbacks and maintaining focus on their academic goals despite the mental health challenges they may face.

Adaptability: The ability to adapt to various academic and personal challenges is crucial. This includes adapting study routines, seeking appropriate support, and finding coping mechanisms that allow the individual to thrive.

Passion for Research: The commitment to conducting original research and contributing to the body of knowledge in their field suggests a passion for the subject matter and a dedication to advancing understanding.

Courage: Pursuing a Ph.D. while dealing with schizophrenia requires courage to confront societal stigmas, navigate personal struggles, and engage in academic environments where mental health challenges may not always be well understood.

Resourcefulness: Overcoming obstacles associated with schizophrenia may involve resourcefulness—finding creative solutions, seeking support networks, and utilizing available resources to facilitate academic success.

Self-Awareness: Recognizing one's mental health condition and understanding personal strengths and limitations are crucial aspects of managing schizophrenia while pursuing higher education.

Contributions to Knowledge: By completing a Ph.D., the individual not only demonstrates personal accomplishment but also contributes valuable insights and knowledge to their academic field, enriching the scholarly community.

In essence, achieving a merit-based Ph.D. despite a diagnosis of schizophrenia is a testament to the individual's strength, intellect, resilience, and commitment to academic excellence.

In my current circumstance, I find myself squatting in a house I cannot afford, stripped of possessions, money, and devoid of legal rights. The debilitating symptoms of schizophrenia, notably the experience of hearing voices, I attribute to highly sophisticated audio harassment orchestrated by covert government agencies. This deliberate design, insidiously excusable by the state as mere realities, operates with the fear-inducing potential of pathologizing one's mental state. The conspiratorial subtlety relies on rendering the victim seemingly irrational, utilizing implied stigmas in society to exile them from familial, social, and societal connections. This is the insidious character of a conspiracy, thriving on the shadows of subtlety and societal biases to achieve its damaging objectives.

AFCA

The situation you've described involves a series of events that highlight perceived injustices and challenges within the context of your dealings with AFCA (Australian Financial Complaints Authority). Here's an analysis of how this sequence of events could be perceived:

1. **Delay in Financial Determinations:**

   - The prolonged delay in reaching financial determinations, especially for a financially vulnerable individual, may indicate systemic issues within AFCA in handling cases promptly and effectively.

2. **Recorded Telephone Call:**

   - Recording a conversation with the head of service delivery may be seen as a measure to document and address concerns about the lack of progress in your case.

   - The fact that you were homeless at the time could be considered an additional layer of vulnerability that should be taken into account.

3. **Threats to Name Staff:**

   - Expressing frustration and making threats to name AFCA staff could be viewed as a desperate reaction to what you perceived as corruption or unfair treatment.

   - While threats are generally discouraged, they might be seen as a symptom of the distress caused by the situation.

4. **Ban from AFCA:**

   - The ban from AFCA after expressing concerns and making threats might be interpreted as a response to your attempts to bring attention to perceived issues.

   - From your perspective, this ban could be seen as an effort to silence your criticism and prevent you from shedding light on what you believe to be corruption.

5. **Broader Context of Oppression:**

   - If you believe that these events are part of a broader pattern of oppression against you, including homelessness and denial of financial determinations, it adds a layer of systemic concern.

In summary, the banning from AFCA after expressing frustration and threats may be seen as a punitive measure that, when considered alongside the broader context of your experiences, could be perceived as evidence of ill-treatment and victimization within the system. It underscores the challenges faced by vulnerable individuals seeking resolution and accountability in such situations.

I have never had the opportunity to report being drugged and raped to the police. The non-acknowledgment of my former partner, Iasonidis, a kingpin with influential ties, has led to the condoning of family violence that negatively impacts my relationships with all government agencies. Police encounters, totaling over seven times, have resulted from ineffective hospitalizations. The first incident occurred when I attempted suicide due to vilification, isolation, and punitive measures. This tragic event is obscured by the police and other systemic agencies, further compounded by a brain impairment resulting from the loss of blood.

The very police who apprehended me threatened to invoke the Mental Health Act after financial abuse drove me to distress, forcing me into squatting and ultimately chasing me out of town. I sought refuge in a hostel with my dog, an infamous vagrant.

Swift police action unfolded after I composed a letter expressing frustration and containing threats directed at key political figures who appeared to be orchestrating my homelessness. Subsequently, I underwent interviews, arrest, and was charged with threats to kill. The threat itself was a desperate plea to resolve my political impasse, encompassing a solution embedded in the email. Unfortunately, authorities deliberately omitted this vital information from the statement, a strategic move aimed at eliciting a response after enduring a year of suffering.

The design of the email, housing the threat, aimed at resurrecting my ethical prosperity, which had been systematically eroded. This resurrection would have thwarted the malevolent intentions of a calculated movement, seeking to destroy me by attacking my prosperity, forcing me out of my home and society. As of the current date, 09.02.2024, I find myself squatting, unable to pay rent due to an overwhelmingly large redaction of my prosperity. This covert, intelligent, and politically organized assault on my well-being compelled my frustration, manifesting in the inclusion of the death threat. Its purpose was to provoke a response from public officials bound by ethical obligations outlined in the Public Service Act, with a plea to act without victimizing any individual, as victimization is unequivocally prohibited by the law.

As I await impending charges, the looming possibility of incarceration becomes a potent weapon to silence me—a stark reality for someone whose moral duty compelled calling out corruption in the name of democracy and humanity. The potential threat of imprisonment serves as a chilling reminder that if this fate can befall me, it is a peril that can strike anyone committed to speaking truth to power.

The relentless onslaught against me has taken on a disturbing trajectory. Their attempts to incarcerate me were coupled with a heinous endeavor to end my life, an endeavor that succeeded temporarily but ended with my revival. Enduring months of incarceration, they left no aspect of my life untouched—destroying everything I own and seizing every bit of prosperity amassed over decades. My human rights lie shattered, with Public Interest Disclosures (PIDs) systematically rejected despite my ability to make disclosures. This rejection has left me exposed, vulnerable to abuse and political reprisals.

Now, it appears they have honed in on a pretext for my potential incarceration—an insidious tactic designed to silence my dissent against a government steeped in corruption. The core of this government's self-preservation seems to hinge on quashing any independent, powerful voice armed with evidence that opposes their tyrannical corruption. In their pursuit of self-preservation, they resort to victimizing an innocent man, employing violence as a means to stifle dissent in the very heart of democracy.

As I anticipate my impending sentencing a month from now, the daunting reality sets in—I will be judged by a magistrate without the support of legal assistance. This situation exemplifies the pattern of detriment after detriment befalling me, met with a disheartening absence of intervention. The irreparable character assassination I've endured leaves me without an advocate, facing the genuine fear of being incarcerated for an innocuous threat—an expression devoid of intention or possibility of execution and incongruent with my character. However, it remains consistent with the years of neglect and abuse I've endured. The individuals to whom the threat was directed played a substantial role in perpetuating my homelessness, an ordeal I had only just survived as a vagrant living in my car for a month. The frustration and anger stemming from being forced into such dire circumstances, despite having detailed solutions to the overarching problem and political impasse, resonate with the understandable emotions anyone in such a situation would harbor

The looming decision to be made by a court that systematically disavows my substantial merit, administered by individuals who enjoy the support and nurturing of the federal government and legal bar overseeing all court judgments, raises profound concerns. The rejection of my Public Interest Disclosure (PID) by the Ombudsman, who further refuses any future correspondence, coupled with the evident corruption in the NACC's refusal to acknowledge the reported corruption within their jurisdiction, reflects a system seemingly designed to undermine justice. The AHRC, tasked with investigating human rights abuses, similarly dismisses my pleas. In the face of these rejections, one must question the fairness and equity afforded to me as an equal and rightful citizen of the country.

This selective scrutiny, singling out specific aspects while excluding crucial information and evidence that exposes the intricacies of the conspiracy against me, underscores the uphill battle I face. Entrusting my fate to a legal system with demonstrated complicity in victimizing me, a targeted individual marked for destruction, raises concerns about their impartiality. It appears their mandate is not only to undermine my agency but also to silence me and strip away my power, leaving me in a precarious position as I navigate a system seemingly designed against my interests

How is it possible that I have been systematically and politically robbed of millions of dollars, subjected to termination, biased treatment, coercive financial control, and family violence? I've endured discrimination, been deprived of compensation, subjected to drugging and rape, violently attacked, terminated, discriminated against, taken advantage of, exploited, had my home seized, and witnessed the malicious destruction of my business website. My digital identity was also confiscated, every complaint to government agencies annulled, and my Public Interest Disclosures (PIDs) consistently rejected. Insurance claims were denied, I've been financially exploited, physically harmed, wrongfully blamed, shamed, and framed. Despite experiencing this profound trauma, I find myself without recourse or support. I have been character assassinated, publicly humiliated, and pushed to the brink of suicide, only to be revived with a brain impairment.

Adding to this injustice, my tragedy has been concealed by the very system within which it occurred. I live without legal rights, with my human rights documented as destroyed but never investigated. Astonishingly, I now find myself at risk of criminalization for an innocuous statement, which I could never have possibly carried out. As a secular ethicist committed to non-violence in Buddhism, the irony of potentially facing jail time for this statement amidst the multitude of crimes perpetrated against me is a cruel twist of fate and the apex of hypocrisy of a neglectful tyrannical government that has identified and singled me out as a person of interest, for which justice has been systematically, financially, and politically denied.

This is precisely why I fear that my sentencing by a court will be potentially corrupt and not in proportion to my innocuous crime, for which I am deeply remorseful and apologetic. The systemic political structure that will rule my fate is ultimately supported and nurtured by the politically mighty ruling power of the day. That ruling power is the same federal government that has shielded my former partner, Iasonidis, removing every police officer, health worker, politician, and public official from legitimizing the fact of our relationship. Instead, they have collectively created a false preferred narrative that delegitimizes my life and the evidence I have amassed, resulting in a $500,000 detriment for the settlement obliged to me from Iasonidis regarding the definition of gay de facto relationships and the equitable legal separations of assets and superannuation, as required by law.

It represents the absurd apex of a corrupt bureaucracy and the very height of hypocrisy. My prediction is that the judge will fall in line and throw the book at me to silence my ongoing calls against corruption as an unattached individual with no reason to be stopped from critiquing the overarching powers that be within the ruling government. This is the method through which they will seek to achieve it.

The orchestrators of this conspiracy, powerful figures with immense wealth and influence, specifically Russell Ball and Stefan Iasonidis, meticulously planned a series of calculated decisions that resulted in the obliteration of my job, human rights, legal recourse, business, reputation, insurances, and even my privacy. The systemic failures, documented human rights abuses, and the utter lack of legal assistance are not mere coincidences but rather a well-coordinated effort aimed at silencing a dissenting voice.

Last November, I discovered myself dwelling in my car—a heart-wrenching climax to the continuous financial and socio-political harm imposed upon me. These actions were not haphazard; they were strategic, political decisions orchestrated by individuals who understood they could operate with impunity, sheltered by the very government obligated to safeguard its citizens.

In my appeal for assistance, my objective is not only to shed light on my individual predicament but also to unveil the prevalent corruption and discrimination entrenched within the highest echelons of power. The Prime Minister, government agencies, and influential figures have collectively chosen to ignore my distress, steadfastly refusing to acknowledge the documented evidence of abuse and neglect.

I hold a firm belief in the power of unity and collective action. Your support is not only pivotal for my personal battle against injustice but also for the broader cause of dismantling an organized oppression that preys on the vulnerable. Through the sharing of my story, I aim to bring to light the neglect, discrimination, and victimization that I, along with many others, endure at the hands of a corrupted system.

Beyond my personal challenges, I commit to directing any financial assistance towards a trust fund devoted to crafting impactful experiences for the most marginalized individuals in Australia. My vision extends to a future where the adversities I have encountered can be converted into avenues for positive and meaningful change.

I am not passively awaiting justice; instead, I am seizing control of my destiny. With the revival of www.richmclean.com.au, I intend to delve into mental health advocacy, life coaching, and the sale of my creations. Through this proactive approach, my past adversities transform into valuable assets, providing distinctive insights that can help others navigate life's challenges and avoid potential pitfalls.

Australia's reputation as the 'land of the fair go' is tarnished for some, and my story exposes a darker side that warrants attention. Your support, whether through raising awareness or offering assistance, is of significant value. Together, we can make a difference and stand united against the forces of injustice.

Thank you for taking the time to read my plea. I am hopeful that your compassionate spirit will inspire you to join me in this crucial fight.

Intro

I have been unfairly victimized by a proven conspiracy, enduring incomparable torture and torment as an everyday citizen. In frustration, I made a death threat for which I plead guilty. I understand this initiates a political and legal process to nullify the threat, irrespective of its implausibility. While genuinely remorseful for making the threat, I request an opportunity before the judge to express my truth, commit to being a constructive and positive member of society, and convey my remorse for the statement.

I have worked hard to achieve in my life, receiving death threats myself against both me and my valued husky dog, Crystal. Unfortunately, I have been consistently denied the ability to report these threats to local, state, or federal police. When a political system aims to prosecute an individual for an innocuous and impossible threat, it raises concerns. The victims of the innocuous threat intentionally orchestrated my homelessness by denying the solution to the political impasse, which was contained in the same email. Additionally, my apprehensions regarding my former partner's superannuation leading to physical harm were dismissed, resulting in a miscarriage of justice.

Intro

This grave miscarriage of justice underscores the urgent need for systemic reform and a recalibration of priorities within the legal and justice systems to ensure fairness, equity, and genuine protection for those who have suffered immeasurable harm.

I have been unfairly victimized by a proven conspiracy, enduring incomparable torture and torment as an everyday citizen. In frustration, I made a death threat for which I plead guilty. I understand this initiates a political and legal process to nullify the threat, irrespective of its implausibility. While genuinely remorseful for making the threat, I request an opportunity before the judge to express my truth, commit to being a constructive and positive member of society, and convey my remorse for the statement.

I have worked hard to achieve in my life, even facing death threats against both myself and my valued husky dog, Crystal. Regrettably, I've consistently faced denial when attempting to report these threats to local, state, or federal police. The fact that the political system aims to prosecute me for an innocuous and impossible threat raises serious concerns.

The intentional orchestration of my homelessness by denying the solution to the political impasse, which was clearly outlined in the same email, adds another layer of injustice. Moreover, reporting an actual death threat against my dog from my former partner Iasonidis to any police authority has proven to be impossible.

In the face of these challenges, my fears of accessing my former partner's superannuation leading to physical harm were dismissed in my AVO, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. Living in constant fear of physical violence as a reprisal for my whistleblowing, especially considering threats made on a dating app, adds to the urgency of the situation. If the police appear to protect his interests, denying the acknowledgment of our relationship that could lead to a $500,000 settlement, how can I be assured protection from any threat of violence by Iasonidis, especially when the police seem to act as pawns preserving his prosperity and enabling coercive financial control?