The decision to initially grant me $58,000 for a SILS application but not address my homelessness, and then retroactively determine that it was inclusive of my plan, not in addition to it, is corrupt and cruel. Firstly, the SILS application was never completed by the OT, which highlights the need for continued financial support for housing to complete the application. This is especially crucial since the OT discontinued her investigation abruptly, stating that remaining data would be collected from people who had known me for less than two weeks. This can be considered an incomplete investigation, essential for the assessment of my SILS application. However, the NDIS has already informed me that they expect no change to my rejection of SILS, based on the last OT's recommendation of only 27 hours of support for the entire year, obtained without relying on my information but rather from the health system, which are also my abusers. This is a stark contrast to the million dollars allocated for SILS, which would have assisted with my disability-related needs. The decision to also charge my NDIS plan with MTA, claiming it was inclusive, is deceptive and a direct attack on my well-being, aiming to induce homelessness. To support my claim, I have videos of Carole from GenU confirming that she has a receipt number guaranteeing the MTA was supposed to be in addition to my plan. I would not have chosen this option if there were sufficient funds. Now, the NDIS has supercharged my plan, leading to imminent poverty, homelessness, and a heightened risk of suicide. I explicitly conveyed to the behavior specialist that I would consider suicide if I do not receive SILS, highlighting the financial abuse and conspiracy in which the NDIS is complicit, protecting Stefan Iasonidis. This situation is a form of gaslighting in a systemic, political, and legal manner, altering my sense of reality. I am no longer certain of who I am fighting against. Hence, my demand for a review of the decision takes this form to bring attention to my treatment, victimization, and abuse. I will deliver it in multiple ways, including registered post on January 22, 2024, as I cannot rely on Free Living Australia management to report documented human rights abuses by their employees and an NDIS support worker, as per their obligation under the NDIS Code of Conduct. Despite having no legal avenue to deliver this message, it is a legal issue. I am aware that every statutory agency has a team of lawyers to protect themselves and their employees as public officials. The decision has been demonstrated to be corrupt.