Jan 2024

Dear Michael Carr Gregg

 

Introduction    

The prime minister    

People with disability and the law; demanding representation    

My financial detriments over twenty years now proven as pre determined to fail; thats corruption    

I demand an end to my cruel degrading treatment punishment and torture    

Proof I am a Targeted individual    

Purpose of this letter    

Prove I am a targeted individual    

Detail what they took from me as a TI in my persecution    

Prove my prosperity has been deliberately redacted from me    

Prove my human rights have been abused    

I demand access to justice    

Demanding my identification as a TI  stop    

 

 

Introduction

 

 

When you finally realise you are a targeted individual the Australian government from intelligence at ASIO and beyond it means that any issue or decision with any government agency whether it be a ruling or insurance or compensation or an investigation I can now be sure my reputation precedes me. It has proven over time to be highly likely any decision or ruling is pre determined to fail eliciting your detriment.

 

That is because when it comes tome - the books are entirely cooked.

 

It has been and still is my moral obligation to call out corruption in this democracy we call Australia. A place we all thought everyone had a fair go but its not true for some. If it can happen to me it can happen to you. If you tolerate this either you or your children will be next. Silence is complicity. Its not courageous nor brave to follow the leader. Especially when the leader is crooked to the bone. Now that I’ve spoken up about corruption as a person never afraid to critique the powers that be - I am now a rejected whistleblower ex communicated from the government and sadly a targeted individual ear marked for destruction. I have not been protected by anyone especially anyone in Government because it is them who have been the source of my persecution victimisation and many detriments. That I have not been protected is incredibly dangerous for me because it leaves me even wider open for exploitation further brutal persecution and there exists the malice with which to kill then hide behind layers of bureaucracy whilst vilifying me for ‘mental illness’. Madness in individuals is extremely rare but in society it is the norm.

 

’When wealth is passed off as merit, bad luck is seen as bad character. This is how ideologues justify punishing the sick and the poor. But poverty is neither a crime nor a character flaw. Stigmatise those who let people die, not those who struggle to live.’  Sarah Kendzior

 

In the solitude of my Christmas, isolated from blood family and friends, and excommunicated from the federal government, I find myself reflecting on a life that has taken an unforeseen turn. Recently surviving over a month as a fugitive, living in my car without adequate food or medicine, I witnessed the systematic deconstruction of everything that could help rebuild my existence. The vilification and character assassination aspects of my persecution have proven alarmingly effective, leaving me grappling with the harsh reality of rejection.

​

My journey is marked by a profound transformation—once known as Dr. Rich McLean, a thriving individual with a wealth of accomplishments, I am now Barran Dodger. The demise of Dr. Rich McLean was not a result of personal choice, but a victim of a conspiracy that led to a suicide attempt inside Werribee Mercy Hospital in February 2021. Though discovered by chance and revived, the aftermath has been a whitewashing and cover-up of the tragedy, devoid of any compensation for the brain injury that the hospital is undeniably liable for, considering their abandonment of duty of care.

​

My life's journey has been diverse—spanning a bachelor's degree in fine art, thirty years as a practicing artist, an award-winning autobiography on human rights, a master's degree in education, former illustrator for prominent publications, a documentary on my life and art, a PhD exploring post-human realities, and the design and operation of a successful online business for two decades. Despite these accomplishments, I have been diagnosed with schizophrenia, ADHD, adjustment disorder, panic disorder, bipolar disorder, and suffer from a cognitive brain impairment resulting from a suicide attempt.

​

The suicide attempt wasn't a manifestation of mental illness but a response to the vilification I endured, a conspiracy against me, and intentional isolation from society. Shame, stigma, discrimination, and disparate treatment by both people and the government fueled the desperation that led to my attempt. Moreover, I was entangled in a coercive financial control and family violence orchestrated by my former partner, Steve Iasonidis—a criminal mastermind with ties to ASIO.

​

However, the gravest injustice lies in the refusal of any government agency, including ASIO, AGIS, the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Centrelink, the tax office, ASIC, APRA, AFSA, the Commonwealth Ombudsman, or the NACC, to acknowledge the existence of my relationship with Steve Iasonidis. This orchestrated denial perpetuates a false narrative, denies me rightful settlement, and signifies a deep-seated corruption within the system.

Recently, I endured a month of homelessness, my worldly possessions destroyed, living as a scapegoat with no legal or human rights as a targeted individual of the Australian government. My two-decade prosperity was systematically redacted in a politicized manner due to the lack of access to legal representation. Every decision affecting my financial wealth has been proven to be inequitable, illegal, and pre-determined to fail by design.

​

In this precarious position, I find myself unable to secure legal representation, labeled a failed whistleblower despite eligibility, and unable to report crime to the police. Infamously vilified as a vagrant with a real or perceived mental illness, I grapple with insufficient funds, food, medicine, healthcare, and support.

​

My life has been marked by hospitalizations orchestrated to silence me, with one occasion resulting in the disposal of my possessions and my forced relocation to a homeless shelter. A violent encounter with authorities further emphasized the orchestrated harm, serving as a warning to remain silent about my persecution and whistleblowing. In another chilling incident, I was violently beaten inside a hospital by a government-contracted assailant, exposing the dark underbelly of this elaborate conspiracy—a force that not only employs neglect and deceit but resorts to violence to demonize and harm its targets.

 

​

 

 

I have been subjected to unjust treatment, and a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice is undeniably underway. There is simply no other way to interpret the gravity of the situation. I find myself repeatedly robbed due to a lack of legal representation, resulting in a long list of detriments.

​

My human rights have been grossly abused, with an NDIS worker filing a report that no NDIS company is willing to endorse. The AHRC, tasked with protecting human rights, has regrettably refused to investigate.

The glaring truth is that I have been denied access and equality before the law throughout my fifty years, never having the opportunity to engage an impartial, fair, and unbiased lawyer capable of effecting meaningful change in any of my struggles.

​

Compounding the injustices, it is an undeniable fact that I was once engaged to be married to an ASIO agent. Strangely, this reality has never been acknowledged by any government agency, highlighting a disturbing pattern of oversight.

I am a targeted individual of the Australian government, and it is evident that the highest office in the land is complicit in my plight. A plea for meaningful intervention to the Prime Minister yielded a disappointing response. My narrative, evidence, and story were delegitimized, with a mere redirection to the Attorney General Mark Dreyfus' office. Despite my attempts to shed light on the corruption and exploitation orchestrated by my former partner Stefan Iasonidis, the system remains indifferent. AGIS and the Commonwealth Ombudsman, institutions designed to ensure justice, are already aware of the exploitation but have failed to address the lack of a fair and legal settlement pertaining to our five-year relationship.

​

Adding to the ordeal, my whistleblower status at the Commonwealth Ombudsman has been rendered futile, despite meeting all necessary attributes for a Public Interest Disclosure (PID). They have coldly refused all future correspondence, employing a 'delay, deny, defer' mantra to suppress acknowledgnent of the issues at hand, shrouded behind layers of bureaucratic red tape that shields individuals from accountability.

​

Tangible evidence of my relationship with Stefan, including shared bank statements, five years of photos, and lease agreements from different properties, is dismissed. The government, in a perplexing turn, seems more inclined to protect him, choosing to vilify me for mental illness while neglecting the myriad socio-political factors contributing to my victimization and immense detriment.

​

My attempt to access information through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request from the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet was met with deception. An extension was granted on the grounds of the request being 'voluminous' and 'complex,' only to receive a blatantly false response claiming that 'no documents exist.'

​

I am now thrust into poverty, designed and destined to be exposed and vulnerable as a rejected whistleblower without protection. Police, instead of protecting me, have been weaponized to vilify me solely on the grounds of 'mental illness,' conveniently rejecting all crimes committed against me. Furthermore, the Federal Anti-Corruption Commission, meant to address corruption, has de-legitimized my complaint with absolute silence, raising serious concerns about its integrity.

 

 

The prime minister

 

It is certain that the highest office of the land is complicit. The prime minister refused to meaningfully intervene. I wrote to the prime minister with a letter. It detailing the situation of my victimisation, oppression, discrimination, my lack of access to a lawyer, my persecution, my financial detriments and my injustice to meaningfully intervene in my plight. His response was disappointing. He de-legitimised my story and my narrative and my evidence and instead directed me to the attorney general Mark Dreyfus’ office. He did not respond in a way that identified himself but public officials at his office referred me to investigate the corruption of an exploitation of me by former partner Stefan Iasonidis to AGIS who investigate ASIO and the Commonwealth Ombudsman. But AGIS are already aware of the exploitation of me by my former fiancé Stefan Iasonidis and the lack of a fair equitable and legal settlement settlement that is a legal obligation to seperate assets of the five years we were together. Additionally I am a failed whistleblower at the commonwealth ombudsman despite having the necessary attributes that make it possible to make a PID under the appropriate legislation and additionally they have refused all future correspondence from me. Delay, deny, defer is the Government mantra in order to deny traction of an issue they don’t eat to acknowledge and it is delivered hidden behind layers of bureaucracy that de identify individuals from accountability. 

 

It is with the evidence that my relationship with him existed with bank statements in each others name, five years of photos, and lease agreements from two different properties that I can be certain that the government are protecting him in favour of vilifying me for mental illness to the exclusion of every other socio political factor that is existing in my life that has victimised me tortured me and caused my immense detriment.

 

I applied for my FOI from the office of prime minister and cabinet. An extension of time was requested because it was ‘voluminous’ and ‘complex’. My answer was returned in a blatant lie and deception that ‘no documents exist’

​

People with disability and the law; demanding representation

​

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity. It was ratified in 2008 in Australia as a foundation of this country underpinning all laws.

 

In particular in regard to Article 12 – Equal recognition before the law:

 

1. States Parties reaffirm that persons with disabilities have the right to recognition everywhere as persons before the law.

2. States Parties shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life.

3. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.

4. States Parties shall ensure that all measures that relate to the exercise of legal capacity provide for appropriate and effective safeguards to prevent abuse in accordance with international human rights law. Such safeguards shall ensure that measures relating to the exercise of legal capacity respect the rights, will and preferences of the person, are free of conflict of interest and undue influence, are proportional and tailored to the person’s circumstances, apply for the shortest time possible and are subject to regular review by a competent, independent and impartial authority or judicial body. The safeguards shall be proportional to the degree to which such measures affect the person’s rights and interests.

5. Subject to the provisions of this article, States Parties shall take all appropriate and effective measures to ensure the equal right of persons with disabilities to own or inherit property, to control their own financial affairs and to have equal access to bank loans, mortgages and other forms of financial credit, and shall ensure that persons with disabilities are not arbitrarily deprived of their property.

I am fifty years old and I have never had a lawyer. That is in defiance of the charter that Australia is a signatory and ratified in 2008. I demand an impartial one from the government as is their obligation to me under the charter.

 

My financial detriments over twenty years now proven as pre determined to fail; thats corruption

 

The list of financial detriments I have suffered over the years listed below have now been unequivocally proven to be decisions that have been pre determined to fail.

 

This deliberate redaction of all of my prosperity were all decisions made at government statutory agencies by lawyers who can be bought, corrupt public officials and supported by politicians too afraid to speak up and critique their tyrannical overlords who pay them handsomely to live in luxury and privilege and to never deviate from towing the party line.

 

I feel sorry for them for being restricted in their critical thinking and individual thought limited by the powers that pay/bribe them. I do not suffer the same restrictions as public officials and I never have and I never will. They all were and are decisions that were made by public officials and lawyers that were unethical illegal unbalanced biased immoral and brutally unfair to me. 

 

I have never had access to the law and every Government agency has a whole raft of lawyers supporting the department or statutory authorities where I was doomed to fail for the decisions that redacted my prosperity with compensations settlements insurances and other financial windfalls.

 

The list as you can see below is long, over years and it identifies that a massive amount of financial detriment has been redacted from me in a way that has been systemic and political an brutally victimised me and robbed me. This has victimised me and victimisation is against the law.

 

• Unfair termination settlement from the Age newspaper, $300000

• Work cover settlement from 2004, $300000

• Incorrect TPD payment from 2008, $500000

• Medical malpractice settlement in 2017, $300000

• HCF income assist settlement in 2021, $750000

• Work Cover settlement in 2021, $750000

• Provisional payments from work cover 2021, $50000

• Business insurance payout 2021, $100000

• Former partner settlement, $500000

• Settlement for my cognitive brain impairment sustained inside a hospital the they owed a duty of care, $2500000

• Sue for my business website maliciously destroyed, $100000,

• Claim for loss after my worldly possessions were destroyed, $50000,

• Detriments of over 2 million after being banned at AFCA, $20000000,

• Detriments of over 1.5 million after insurance settlement was free kicked to opposition at AHRC, $15000000,

• Money to pay for my accomodation blocked from arriving at the NDIS/A, $25000,

• Child sexual abuse redress from DSS delayed denied deferred, $250000,

• VOCAT case for child sexual abuse case cited by magistrate as ‘doomed’, $25000,

• VOCAT case for violent affray in which I was hospitalised with broken bones and slashes for intervening and sticking up for a member of the public rejected, $25000

• Compensated for being run over by a car (most likely a government vehicle), $50000

• Compensation for being violently attacked inside a hospital by a not so undercover government thug, $200000

• Compensation for a provable conspiracy to pervert the course of justice causing death, $300000

• Compensation for the whitewashing of that tragedy by dozens of high ranking public officials who has a responsibility to act ethically with the public services act, $300000

​

I demand an end to my cruel degrading treatment punishment and torture

 

My treatment has been torture. I am demanding an end to my torture. I use the word ‘torture’ as per the definition in the ‘convention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of punishment’ that has been ratified by Australia and overseen by the UN under international law and treaty.

 

The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment that Australia is a signatory to states ‘For the purposes of this Convention, the term "torture" means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.’

 

This has been torture for me. Physical and mental suffering has been inflicted upon me to punish me for perceived ills. It has been enacted systemically and politically by de-legitimising my story experience and proof. Public officials act in defiance of the public service charter requiring them act ethically and within the law.

​

Title: A Desperate Plea for Justice: My Isolation and Struggle Against Systemic Oppression

Introduction:

As I sit here on Christmas Day in 2023, I find myself isolated and trapped in a nightmarish reality, a victim of a conspiracy to pervert justice orchestrated by the very government meant to protect me. This page stands as a testament to my life, marred by being cast as a scapegoat and targeted by the Australian Government.

The Systemic Oppression:

In this heart-wrenching narrative, I unveil a calculated plan by the government to ensure I never gain traction with any agency. This malicious strategy has led to financial persecution, pushing me into homelessness. It is a deliberate orchestration of destitution, amplifying the risk of self-harm and mental distress. Poverty becomes a tool in the government's arsenal, complicit in amplifying my mental illness.

Proof of the conspiracy:

In the labyrinth of bureaucratic indifference and institutional betrayal, my journey as a whistleblower has become a Sisyphean struggle, marked by perpetual rejection and isolation. Despite my earnest attempts to expose wrongdoing, the doors of justice remain resolutely closed, leaving me to navigate a Kafkaesque nightmare without legal support, protection, or recourse.

Silencing me

I stand as a failed whistleblower, a voice drowned out by the systemic deficiencies that undermine the very principles of transparency and accountability. The absence of legal representation has left me vulnerable, a lone individual seeking justice against a formidable system that seems designed to silence dissent.

Police as abusers

Even the avenue of law enforcement is fraught with peril, as the police, instead of upholding justice, weaponize the Mental Health Act against me. Rather than addressing my concerns, they choose to vilify me for my alleged illness, culminating in my unwarranted hospitalization. The very institution meant to protect citizens becomes a tool for suppression, exacerbating my plight.

The prime minister

Attempts to shed light on the malfeasance through the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (OPMC) have met with a stonewall. My Freedom of Information (FOI) request, initially described as 'voluminous' and 'complex,' is summarily rejected by the OPMC, claiming the nonexistence of relevant documents. This denial not only mocks the principles of transparency but further underscores the entrenched unwillingness to address my grievances.

Anti corruption commission is corrupt

I find myself blacklisted from the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), a stark manifestation of how those with power seek to protect themselves from scrutiny. Similarly, a ban from contacting the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denies me a channel for recourse against financial injustices.

Human rights commission elongating abuse

The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), entrusted with safeguarding human rights, turns a blind eye to my documented abuses by a National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) worker. The deafening silence from the AHRC further compounds the sense of helplessness in the face of systematic injustice.

The attorney general(s)

The office of the Attorney General, Mark Dreyfus, remains impervious to my cries for attention. Calls and emails echo into the void, ignored by those who should champion justice and uphold the rule of law.

The Ombudsman

The Commonwealth Ombudsman, purportedly a last resort for grievances against government bodies, has slammed its doors shut on me. Refusing all further correspondence, this institution designed to ensure accountability becomes yet another pillar of the bureaucracy indifferent to my plight.

As I grapple with the weight of rejection, the systemic failure to address my concerns not only undermines my faith in the very institutions meant to protect citizens but exposes the dire need for reform. In this narrative of abandonment, I persist in my pursuit of justice, a lone voice against a tide of institutional apathy.

 

Intentional Vilification and Mental Health:

​

I expose the intentional vilification for 'mental illness,' emphasizing the exclusion of socio-political factors affecting my life. The deliberate exacerbation of my mental illness, coupled with the suppression of my prosperity over the years, paints a bleak picture of an individual oppressed in a systemic and politicized manner.

​

Denied Legal Rights and Whistleblower Rejection:

​

My desperate plea for justice reveals a long and uphill battle against forces disproportionate to my effectiveness. I stand as a rejected whistleblower, opposing intentional torture and demanding its cessation. The denial of access to unbiased legal representation highlights a blatant violation of the human rights charter, challenging the very essence of equality before the law.

​

Conspiracy and Government Silence:

​

My attempt to expose the conspiracy leads to a trail of silence from government agencies. The rejection by the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the refusal of AGIS to investigate further demonstrate a deliberate attempt to silence my dissenting voice, perpetuating my suffering.

​

Human Rights Abuses and Homelessness:

​

 

My human rights have been abused, and legal rights obliterated, leading to infamy as a vagrant, ex-communicated from the Australian government. Homelessness becomes a bitter reality, as I navigate life in a car, fleeing not just from authorities but also from mental health services attempting forced hospitalization.

Demand for Justice:

​

With no wealth, no legal representation, and a laundry list of injustices, I demand an end to the cruel and degrading treatment. Referencing international agreements such as the Convention against Torture, I assert that the orchestrated torture has been politically motivated, a violation of fundamental human rights.

​

Conclusion:

 

This harrowing account sheds light on the darker side of systemic oppression, where a government's actions can strip an individual of their dignity, rights, and livelihood. As I call for justice and an end to my torment, this page stands as a haunting reminder of the ongoing struggle against a malevolent force that should be protecting its citizens.

 

 

Proof I am a Targeted individual

 

Previously I have earned enormous merit for my advocacy and altruism. But that was then and I had pissed off some powerful people. Now I unfortunately possess these qualities which have happened over time and now in retrospect my contacting all of them over years had been doomed to fail and the responses were informed in a way as to de legitimise my story my narrative my evidence in order to never elicit my prosperity being delivered. In doing so it has obliterated my human and legal rights.

 

I am a failed whistleblower,

I have never had a lawyer,

I cannot go to police because they utilise the mental health act to vilify me for illness and hospitalise me,

The OPMC refuse my FOI, citing no documents exist, when it was first described as ‘voluminous’ and ‘complex’.

I have been blacklisted from the NACC,

I am banned from contacting AFCA,

The AHRC refuse to investigate my documented human rights abuses by an NDIS worker,

The attorney general mark Dreyfus has ignored all myths calls and emails,

The Commonwealth Ombudsman has refused all further correspondence,

 

As a scapegoat the Government has become my nemesis and maybe always was. The Government nurtures the legal bar that oversees all lawyers. All things in society are ultimately under the auspice of the federal Government including insurance the banks human rights equality law and order and justice and health.

 

All of them have been worded up to act to my detriment.

 

I’ve lost all my insurances, the hospital is my jail, the community mental health team de-legitimise all my issues and like police vilify me for madness excluding everything else, no advocacy agency will stand for me, national mental health charities like SANE have ignored me when I was once their champion, the

 

 

Office of chief psychiatrist

The OPP

MCC, MHCC, Police, IBAC, The Victorian Inspectorate, AHPRA, NHPOPC, The Ombudsman, 

VMIAC

 

List them

​

Maliciously, this took away everything I had including:

 

My business

My accreditation,

My human rights,

My access to the law,

My reputation,

My work cover,

My insurances,

My settlements,

My fair treatment,

My right to be treated impartially,

My ability to rent a home,

 

I have been violently attacked twice, once inside a hospital by a government contracted thug, this was obvious because he had my tattoo on his t-shirt before he attacked me. I was cornered, retaliated and smashed his teeth in broke his nose and smashed his head into the concrete. Strange a patient would not press charges. Why? The conspiracy that includes employing violence would be exposed.

 

 

 

 

 

Purpose of this letter

 

As my moral obligation to call out corruption to further the country

 

Paragraph

 

To present evidence of that corruption

 

(Do that inside chapters)

 

Have the evidence acknowledged and not ignored de-legitimised or pointedly neglected

 

To avoid being incarcerated in a psychiatric hospital and to stop persecution from police and the CAT team

 

To meet the criteria to have an assessment order, an individual must be a danger to himself or someone else. I am neither of those things. I am not delusional. I am not hearing voices. I am not suicidal.

 

To avoid being jailed with any crime I have either admitted to be forced to do or am framed by

 

The Cranbourne police have demanded that I front up to collect court documents. However I am unprepared to do this because I cannot trust police not to take me to hospital when they are acting on an order yet still no not acknowledge the crimes committed upon me systemically and politically.

 

If I am am jailed for crime I have either admitted to or I have been framed with and it is also true that the incredible amount of crime that has occurred to me is not acknowledge then this would be an absurd amount of hypocrisy.  It would only serve to stand as my further persecution and that would be to silence me by incarceration in a jail to prevent me from speaking out about my treatment and corruption in the government as a failed whistleblower.

 

I demand protection.

 

Demand a home from the NDIS and to be able to live in a home free from persecution and victimisation from police and CAT team and of being a TI

 

Prove I am a targeted individual

 

As it currently stands ‘my own version of events’ as you described them as is not my existential opinion of my perception only unique to me but a phenomenon that can be demonstrated with evidence and absolute facts. Those are facts that render the following things:

 

• I am a failed whistleblower,

• I have never had a lawyer,

• I cannot go to police because they utilise the mental health act to vilify me for illness and hospitalise me,

• The OPMC refuse my FOI, citing no documents exist, when it was first described as ‘voluminous’ and ‘complex’.

• I have been blacklisted from the NACC,

• I am banned from contacting AFCA,

• The AHRC refuse to investigate my documented human rights abuses by an NDIS worker,

• The attorney general mark Dreyfus has ignored all myths calls and emails,

• The Commonwealth Ombudsman has refused all further correspondence,

 

As a scapegoat the Government has become my nemesis and maybe always was. The Government nurtures the legal bar that oversees all lawyers.

 

All things in society are ultimately under the auspice of the federal Government including insurance the banks human rights equality law and order and justice and health.

 

Detail what they took from me as a TI in my persecution

 

Maliciously, this took away everything he had including:
 

• His business,

• His accreditation,

• His human rights,

• His access to the law,

• His reputation,

• His work cover,

• His insurances,

• His settlements,

• His fair treatment,

• His right to be treated impartially,

• His ability to rent a home,
   

I not only had my home taken away, but its contents were destroyed as well. I found myself being force-medicated for what they dismissed as 'delusions of persecution,' which were, in reality, horrifyingly true. My privacy was invaded, subjected to constant surveillance, and I was banned from numerous social media platforms, including Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and more. They didn't stop there; they went on to obliterate my business website, which also held my Australian Business Number (ABN), and maliciously erased my digital identity crucial for online logins.

To add to the ordeal, they blocked my emails from various government agencies, denied my access to The Federal Court, and even refused my basic right to report crimes. Astonishingly, they went as far as blocking me from the Australian Federal Police (AFP) on Instagram. They didn't just stop at infringing on my rights; they took away my hope by intercepting my phone, controlling my contacts, and dictating who I could communicate with. Their actions escalated to remote planting of illegal content on my personal computer, encouraging harmful activities, and allowing drug use and abuse through neglect.

The denial of my ADHD medication, dexamphetamine, was a deliberate act causing severe harm. Their tactics included character assassination, severing ties with long-standing friends, intentional isolation, and the use of subsonic audio harassment for torture and debilitation. In their campaign against me, they lied about their commitment to my care, willfully vilified me for 'mental illness,' and subjected me to unspeakable torture. This conspiracy reached the depths of deception and covert intelligence, going so far as to hire a thug to violently attack me inside a public hospital.

All these actions collectively affirm that I am indeed a targeted individual (TI).

 

Prove my prosperity has been deliberately redacted from me

 

This deliberate redaction of all of my prosperity were all decisions made at government statutory agencies by lawyers who can be bought, corrupt public officials and supported by politicians too afraid to speak up and critique their tyrannical overlords who pay them handsomely to live in luxury and privilege and to never deviate from towing the party line.

 

I feel sorry for them for being restricted in their critical thinking and individual thought limited by the powers that pay/bribe them. I do not suffer the same restrictions as public officials and I never have and I never will. They all were and are decisions that were made by public officials and lawyers that were unethical illegal unbalanced biased immoral and brutally unfair to me. 

 

I have never had access to the law and every Government agency has a whole raft of lawyers supporting the department or statutory authorities where I was doomed to fail for the decisions that redacted my prosperity with compensations settlements insurances and other financial windfalls.

 

This has been a systemic and political movement that has maliciously redacted my prosperity over years ever since my autobiography on recovering from schizophrenia was published in 2022. The movement  had prejudice and treated me differently and has literally robbed me over decades for the reason of never having any legal representation. It has ultimately taken my human rights and also obliterated my legal rights. I have suffered enormous and fatal detriment over years from my victimisation. Victimisation is against the law.

 

Decisions about these determinations are made at government agencies and companies and institutions who have access to a whole raft of lawyers. Therefore all decisions leading to my financial detriment have been corrupt inequitable unethical and illegal and have acted outside legal principles.

 

The list as you can see below is long, over years and it identifies that a massive amount of financial detriment has been redacted from me in a way that has been systemic and political an brutally victimised me and robbed me. This has victimised me and victimisation is against the law.

 

• Unfair Termination Settlement from The Age Newspaper: $300,000

• WorkCover Settlement from 2004: $300,000

• Incorrect TPD Payment from 2008: $500,000

• Medical Malpractice Settlement in 2017: $300,000

• HCF Income Assist Settlement in 2021: $750,000

• WorkCover Settlement in 2021: $750,000

• Provisional Payments from WorkCover in 2021: $50,000

• Business Insurance Payout in 2021: $100,000

• Former Partner Settlement: $500,000

• Settlement for Cognitive Brain Impairment: $2,500,000

• Lawsuit for Malicious Destruction of Business Website: $100,000

• Claim for Loss after Possessions Destroyed: $50,000

• Detriments after Being Banned at AFCA: $20,000,000

• Detriments after Insurance Settlement at AHRC: $15,000,000

• Money Blocked from NDIS/A for Accommodation: $25,000

• Child Sexual Abuse Redress from DSS: $250,000

• VOCAT Case for Child Sexual Abuse: $25,000

• VOCAT Case for Violent Affray: $25,000

• Compensation for Being Run Over: $50,000

• Compensation for Violent Hospital Attack: $200,000

• Compensation for Conspiracy to Pervent Justice: $300,000

• Compensation for Whitewashing Tragedy: $300,000

 

That is approximately $43,750,000

 

When you politically and systemically remove an individuals access to prosperity and money it creates suffering and designs an individuals poverty. In that way it can be proven my poverty is by design and not a reflection of any character flaw I have or lack of passion or hard work. It has a conscious way of amplifying mental health trauma and suffering because it is widely acknowledged in the literature that finance/money and housing are the two main factors that affect a persons mental well being. 

 

Prove my human rights have been abused

 

AHRC refuse to investigate this document reporting my human right abuses by and NDIS worker.

 

 

 

I was violently attacked inside a hospital by a government thug.

 

My financial health has been decimated and that is proven.

 

I demand access to justice

 

Article 13 – Access to justice

1. States Parties shall ensure effective access to justice for persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others, including through the provision of procedural and age-appropriate accommodations, in order to facilitate their effective role as direct and indirect participants, including as witnesses, in all legal proceedings, including at investigative and other preliminary stages.

2. In order to help to ensure effective access to justice for persons with disabilities, States Parties shall promote appropriate training for those working in the field of administration of justice, including police and prison staff.

Justice to me isn’t about lots of money. Justice to me is at the bare minimum living in a safe home with my dog with enough provisions for food for medicine and freedom from persecution by police or health authorities.

 

Demanding my identification as a TI  stop

 

To act with neglect or silence now after reading this is complicity in my persecution.

 

I have been protesting my persecution as a targeted individual of The Australian Government on YouTube.

 

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity. It was ratified in 2008 in Australia as a foundation of this country underpinning all laws.

 

In particular in regard to Article 12 – Equal recognition before the law:

 

1. States Parties reaffirm that persons with disabilities have the right to recognition everywhere as persons before the law.

2. States Parties shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life.

3. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.

4. States Parties shall ensure that all measures that relate to the exercise of legal capacity provide for appropriate and effective safeguards to prevent abuse in accordance with international human rights law. Such safeguards shall ensure that measures relating to the exercise of legal capacity respect the rights, will and preferences of the person, are free of conflict of interest and undue influence, are proportional and tailored to the person’s circumstances, apply for the shortest time possible and are subject to regular review by a competent, independent and impartial authority or judicial body. The safeguards shall be proportional to the degree to which such measures affect the person’s rights and interests.

5. Subject to the provisions of this article, States Parties shall take all appropriate and effective measures to ensure the equal right of persons with disabilities to own or inherit property, to control their own financial affairs and to have equal access to bank loans, mortgages and other forms of financial credit, and shall ensure that persons with disabilities are not arbitrarily deprived of their property.

I am fifty years old and I have never had a lawyer. That is in defiance of the charter that Australia is a signatory and ratified in 2008.

 

The list of financial detriments I have suffered over the years listed below have now been unequivocally proven to be decisions that have been pre determined to fail.

 

Removing my prosperity has been a way I have known that I am a targeted individual of the Australian government.

 

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) Australia has ratified in 2008 and a signatory to,  is to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.

 

I have had no dignity.

 

Article 40 of the CRPD stipulates that States Parties (signatories to the Convention such as Australia) shall meet regularly in a Conference of States Parties (COSP). This is to consider any matter with regard to the implementation of the Convention. Since 2008, the COSP has been held annually at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, covering a range of themes and issues in round-tables, interactive dialogues and side-events. 

 

A targeted individual becomes such usually for reasons of being a terrorist or a threat to national security and the situation has to be dealt with by the powers that be.  Ordinarily jail would befall a known terrorist, incarceration would become a fate for the criminally insane who is a threat to himself or someone else or otherwise is a threat to the government, alternately to silence the said individual the government may decide to treat them with such contempt and via ‘no touch torture’.

 

That is a method destroy their lives that they create the conditions for either drug addiction or channel them into crime or drive them mad or vilify them for madness and actually be the cause of such neglect they suicide from neglect or from the torture.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When an individuals money is intentionally removed redacted or prevented from getting to them the action is not singularly only about removing their money. You need money to exist in society. Removing their money is an action with an intention to act in order to harm them by removing their power and position in society. The allegory of tpreventing someones access to money could be seen as akin to an intention to cause harm. The ultimate form of harm to an individual is kill Them. That is murder.

 

I made an affirdavid and statutory declaration a few months ago and published it on YouTube out of desperation of my situation as someone who has had all their prosperity removed or prevented from being in receipt of money. The video was a desperate attempt in order to try and protect myself from further persecution from in the first instance police and the health department which had signed an order for me tube hospitalised fop assessment.

 

Someone with your name and handle of @MichaelCarr-Gregg-cd4wm commented the following:

 

'@MichaelCarr-Gregg-cd4wm

1 month ago

What in your reality do you think a stat dec will do for you? All this does is declare that you believe your own reality and version of events. Also you mentioned the coroner will launch an investigation into the public official and system of abuse. I do not think you know what a coroner does’

 

Was this you? If it was it de-legitimised what I was saying and of course was ineffective at providing a solution to my situation. It could be seen as you being interested in me as the targeted individual and victim and then trolling me by leaving your comment. That is a form of online abuse.

​

Barran Dodger

 

 

2. States Parties shall ensure that if persons with disabilities are deprived of their liberty through any process, they are, on an equal basis with others, entitled to guarantees in accordance with international human rights law and shall be treated in compliance with the objectives and principles of the present Convention, including by provision of reasonable accommodation.

There is no reason why I as a person with a disability should not live in reasonable accomodation.

 

Barran Dodger.