Albanese Letter and detail

Dr Whittaker_1Artist Name

00:00 / 25:53

Track NameArtist Name

00:00 / 01:04

ball porn= in=san=e huan= right abuses price in=ister attorn=ey gen=eral work c§over hc§f eviden=c§e to illustrate an=d deon=strate

mmmm

Bridget Haimilton and redwanArtist Name

00:00 / 17:23

Letter to prime Ministers office

The reason I have called out corruption of public officials in this country is so I can literally survive as a human being earmarked for destruction. It is my moral obligation as a democratic citizen with a clean criminal record for the benefit of our democracy, to foster trust in the powers that be, and for the rule of law to be both ethical and equitable, as well as fair.

Even after being subjected to what can only be described as murder through "no-touch torture," I am still seeking justice and accountability. It is for the purpose of exposing the government's harmful actions over the years. I am driven by a desire for justice and accountability, and also to ensure that I am not forced to live in my car again, as I did for over a month in November 2023, as a person with chronic illness. I believe it is important to shed light on the truth and ensure that those responsible face the consequences for their actions.

I am an individual with a disability, diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia, ADHD, adjustment disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety, panic disorder, and also coping with a brain impairment affecting my memory. This impairment resulted from a suicide attempt inside Werribee Mercy Hospital. I took such a drastic step due to persecution, victimization, financial abuse, isolation, and vilification, not solely because of mental illness. Recently, I found myself homeless, living out of my car.

As a person with chronic disabilities, devoid of food, legal representation, and healthcare, residing in my car, I am labeled both an infamous vagrant and a targeted individual persecuted by the government. In my desperation for basic necessities, I applied for an emergency payment from my Centrelink disability support pension. Despite my dire circumstances, I received a call from Centrelink where a woman informed me that I "don’t qualify" for an emergency payment. This rejection is emblematic of the chronic financial negligence and victimization I endure from the Australian government, who are evidently aware that they are causing me harm.

Their actions stem from years of redacting my prosperity, aiming to inflict maximum damage to my financial health and, ultimately, cause harm. On one end, this involves ruining my finances, and on the extreme end, it could lead to neglect that maims, destroys, or, in essence, murders me. The deliberate financial abuse and victimization I experience existed well before my suicide attempt, revealing a politicized, systemic intention. This implies that the "fatal" injury I suffered was consciously intended, constituting a malicious, tyrannical government conspiracy that, in essence, murdered me.

Given their indifference to my life after leaving me without a home, this webpage serves as evidence of the orchestrated financial detriments and substantiates my status as a targeted individual. It also seeks to prompt a response or resolution from the government or the NDIS regarding the provision of a secure location for my dog and me, due to threats from my violent former partner who has vowed to harm us. I demand accommodation and protection from the persecution by the police and health authorities. Beyond basic human rights, I am owed millions, and this situation is proven with facts to negotiate a resolution.

Should the NDIS minister reject my basic human rights demands, I will instruct my lawyer to sue her, aiming to cause maximum damage to her and her reputation. This legal action is based on her complicity in my proven victimization, part of the broader government conspiracy outlined on this page.

Dr. Rich McLean died from a lethal injury in February 2021 beside Werribee Mercy Hospital. Barran Dodger was revived from certain death.

If you tolerate this, then you or your children will be next. Silence is complicity.

They were and are an artist, author, advocate, academic, government scapegoat, and, in retrospect since 2002, a targeted individual of the Australian Government.

Rich was earmarked for destruction from 2022 when his once-celebrated human rights-awarded autobiography became the reason for his vilification by The Herald Sun, leading to his illegal termination at The Age.

He was defeated in the settlement of his illegal termination due to having no lawyer and rejected legal assistance.

The stigma, shame, prejudice, and discrimination perpetrated on him due to his brave, controversial narrative about his experience with schizophrenia, from its publication and being in the public domain, caused personal damage. Later in life his vulnerabilities were weaponised against him indicating that as a targeted individual who had been under investigation that the malice utilised every conceivable weakness he had or he said he had and this is utterly deplorable.

They are a rejected whistleblower. They have never had a lawyer. They cannot report crime to the police. They live under death threats. They suffer family violence. They have been identified, investigated, psychometrically profiled, persecuted, victimized, vilified, violently attacked, systematically, and politically robbed of multimillion dollars. Barra's abject poverty and recent homelessness are via intelligent design by political methods.

His mental illness, as a publicly known existing vulnerability, is intentionally amplified with his poverty, which has been a sustained neglect by the government.

The Government is corrupt. This is simply demonstrated because no government agency will admit Barran’s relationship with Stefan Iasonidis, a former drug mule, tax cheat, and ASIO employee. Every day that Barran lives in his designed poverty is another day the tyrannical government abuses with impunity, and another day family violence dominates Barra’s existence.

Barran’s human rights abuses have been documented by a brave NDIS worker in a report. Each NDIS provider who was ever or presently contracted to Barran's care is under an ethical, moral, and legal obligation to report mistreatment and abuse to authorities under the NDIS code of conduct. They didn’t. The AHRC refuses to investigate. He is banned at AFCA.

He called out corruption last attorney, Gerald.

The Attorney General Mark Dreyfus is silent. The prime minister refuses to meaningfully intervene in Barran’s situation protecting iasonidis.

"No-touch torture" is presently torturing Barran with de-legitimizing his story, narrative, and evidence. It forced his suicide by the deceit and corruption of a proven conspiracy and facial abuse. Mental illness didn’t cause the suicide attempt; it was ‘no-touch torture’ that killed Rich. That demonstrates an intelligent, organized, and covert conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, and this elicited what could be called murder.

Psychological torture techniques with no physical contact inflicted severe mental and emotional distress on him leading up to his attempt over years. It broke his will under extreme stress and vilification for ‘mental illness,’ to the excuse of all other factors, creating a sense of isolation and powerlessness.

The same psychological manipulation, sensory deprivation, facial destruction, removal of legal rights, and obliteration of his human rights, and other various stress-inducing methods such as character assassination were and are still being used three years after he was revived. The impact of Rich's death is profound and long-lasting as a brain injury.

Dr. Rich McLean died from a lethal injury in February 2021 beside Werribee Mercy Hospital. Barran Dodger was revived from certain death. If you tolerate this, then you or your children will be next. Silence is complicity.

They were and are an artist, author, advocate, academic, government scapegoat, and, in retrospect since 2002, a Targeted Individual of the Australian Government. Rich was earmarked for destruction from 2022 when his once-celebrated human rights-awarded autobiography became the reason for his vilification by The Herald Sun, leading to his illegal termination at The Age. He was defeated in the settlement of his illegal termination due to having no lawyer and rejected legal assistance.

In retrospect, this was the first instance of prosperity consciously redacted from him in a political way. Furthermore, this deliberate orchestrated attack to deny his prosperity was directly proportionate to his public profile as a person diagnosed with mental illness. The stigma, shame, prejudice, and discrimination perpetrated on him due to his brave, controversial narrative about his experience with schizophrenia, from its publication and being in the public domain, caused personal damage.

Barra's abject poverty and recent homelessness are via intelligent design by political methods. His mental illness, as a publicly known existing vulnerability, is intentionally amplified with his poverty, which has been a sustained neglect by the government. The Government is corrupt. This is simply demonstrated because no government agency will admit Barran’s relationship with Stefan Iasonidis, a former drug mule, tax cheat, and ASIO employee.

Every day that Barran lives in his designed poverty is another day the tyrannical government abuses with impunity, and another day family violence dominates Barra’s existence. Barran’s human rights abuses have been documented by a brave NDIS worker in a report. Each NDIS provider who was ever or presently contracted to Barran's care is under an ethical, moral, and legal obligation to report mistreatment and abuse to authorities under the NDIS code of conduct. The AHRC refuses to investigate. He is banned at AFCA. He called out corruption last attorney, Gerald.

The Attorney General Mark Dreyfus is silent. The prime minister elected to acknowledge Barran. "No-touch torture" is presently torturing Barran with de-legitimizing his story, narrative, and evidence. It forced his suicide by the deceit and corruption of a proven conspiracy and facial abuse. Mental illness didn’t cause the suicide attempt; it was ‘no-touch torture’ that killed Rich.

That demonstrates an intelligent, organized, and covert conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, and this elicited what could be called murder. Psychological torture techniques with no physical contact inflicted severe mental and emotional distress on him leading up to his attempt over years. It broke his will under extreme stress and vilification for ‘mental illness,’ to the excuse of all other factors, creating a sense of isolation and powerlessness. The same psychological manipulation, sensory deprivation, facial destruction, removal of legal rights, and obliteration of his human rights, and other various stress-inducing methods such as character assassination were and are still being used three years after he was revived. The impact of Rich's death is profound and long-lasting as a brain injury.

My human rights abuses have been documented by an ndis worker but no NDIS company will sign off on it as is their obligation to me to report the abuse of their client who has a mental illness and the AHRC refuse to investigate it which further demonstrates the blacklisting of me as a targeted individual ex communicated from the government

It is simple to see the conspiracy because no government agency will admit my relationship with a former ASIO employee I was engaged to for five years ever existed

This along with me not having access to the law has resulted in the relationship not being legitimised as a fact of life and therefore no fair settlement of our assets has ever happened for the time we were together in which he was a multi millionaire and exploited me whilst I lived on a meagre DSP pension

I also lived off a total permanent disability impairment payout from 2008 and at the start of the relationship I had $100000 and at the end my former partner left me homeless

The non acknowledgement of the relationship at a government level is profound corruption of lawyers of police of public officials and politicians

The result of this deceit and the rendering of a preferred reality which is inconsistent with the truth has financially victimised me of no settlement and I live under coercive financial control and family violence.

Every day I have lived in poverty from 2015 is another day corruption and the persecution of a government tyranny that victimises me and my curse of family violence wins

Examples of mainstream services that would have provided prosperity in order pay for accomodation but have found absurd ways not to include:

Workers compensation was never paid from 2004 and 2021. Ask Danny Pearson the work cover minister to immediately intervene tom pay what was never paid. It is his obligation according to work cover legislation:

93 Provisions to apply where employer does not meet liabilities

1. If the employer of the worker neglects, refuses or is unable to pay compensation in discharge of the employer's liability under section 72(1) within 21 days of receiving the claim for payment of compensation, the liability becomes a liability of the Authority.

Can the ndis minister insist that the liability of my workers compensation be immediately paid to me then I won’t need the NDIS?

The victim, subject to a proven government conspiracy that has left him homeless and excommunicated, faces a profound injustice. Despite the NDIS's mandate to provide reasonable accommodation for disabled individuals, the victim is excluded under the pretext that other government agencies can offer mainstream support. However, his unique circumstances, including the denial of legal rights, financial redaction, and human rights abuses, distinguish him from those able to access mainstream services.

Given the categorical denial of mainstream services and deliberate financial redaction, it is crucial for the NDIS to provide accommodation. Failure to do so would perpetuate his unfair treatment and further victimize him, contradicting the principles outlined in the UN Charter.

The victim now has access to legal representation, and the NDIS CEO must recognize that withholding accommodation would implicate her in this proven conspiracy. The conspiracy, characterized by malice, violence, and intelligence, acts by proxy, and any failure to address the victim's accommodation needs would be seen as complicity. The NDIS CEO should be held accountable for ensuring that the victim, along with his dog, receives the necessary accommodation, aligning with both the NDIS's mission and international human rights standards.

Introduction

The prime minister

People with disability and the law; demanding representation

My financial detriments over twenty years now proven as pre determined to fail; thats corruption

I demand an end to my cruel degrading treatment punishment and torture

Proof I am a Targeted individual

Purpose of this letter

Prove I am a targeted individual

Detail what they took from me as a TI in my persecution

Prove my prosperity has been deliberately redacted from me

Prove my human rights have been abused

I demand access to justice

Demanding my identification as a TI stop

Introduction what he achieved/ did/was

I am one of the most disliked figures in Australia—Dr. Rich McLean—an unwitting target of the Australian Government. Before taking my own life, I was deliberately denied compensation, justice, and access to financial resources, strategically implemented to strip away any power or agency I might have had.

In my time, I was a truth speaker, a truth seeker, and an authentic storyteller, describing my worlds in an unfiltered way that powerful people envied.

These individuals, constrained by societal and government pressures, operated within confines that discouraged challenging overarching powers. Compelled to tow the party line, they were handsomely rewarded for their complicity in the objectives, motives, and decisions of those in power.

I made the regrettable mistake of seeking assistance, justice, and support from countless government agencies, only to realize that these authorities were populated by public officials forbidden to deviate from the norm in helping me. The malice and hate intended over the past twenty years on a systemic, politicized level within the government have now been demonstrated.

The identification of me as a targeted individual existed, at the very least, since the publication of my autobiography, 'Recovered, Not Cured: A Journey Through Schizophrenia.' Over time, new powerful figures consciously orchestrated my demise—individuals protected by the government.

As a targeted individual, any issue or decision with any government agency, whether it be a ruling, insurance, compensation, or an investigation, is predetermined to fail, eliciting further detriment. My reputation precedes me, and the books are entirely cooked.

My moral obligation is to call out corruption in this democracy we call Australia. The notion of a fair go is a façade for some, and if it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone. Silence is complicity, and I am now a rejected whistleblower, excommunicated from the government and earmarked for destruction. I have not been protected, especially by those in government who have been the source of my persecution, victimization, and numerous detriments. The lack of protection is dangerously exposing me to exploitation, further persecution, and the malice that seeks to harm me while hiding behind layers of bureaucracy, all while vilifying me for ‘mental illness’. In society, madness in individuals is extremely rare, but it has become the norm.

Sarah Kendzior aptly captures the essence: "When wealth is passed off as merit, bad luck is seen as bad character. Stigmatize those who let people die, not those who struggle to live."

Christmas Day, 2023

In the solitude of my Christmas, isolated from blood family and friends, and excommunicated from the federal government, I find myself reflecting on a life that has taken an unforeseen turn. Recently surviving over a month as a fugitive, living in my car without adequate food or medicine, I witnessed the systematic deconstruction of everything that could help rebuild my existence. The vilification and character assassination aspects of my persecution have proven alarmingly effective, leaving me grappling with the harsh reality of rejection.

My journey is marked by a profound transformation—once known as Dr. Rich McLean, a thriving individual with a wealth of accomplishments, I am now Barran Dodger. The demise of Dr. Rich McLean was not a result of personal choice, but a victim of a conspiracy that led to a suicide attempt inside Werribee Mercy Hospital in February 2021. Though discovered by chance and revived, the aftermath has been a whitewashing and cover-up of the tragedy, devoid of any compensation for the brain injury that the hospital is undeniably liable for, considering their abandonment of duty of care.

My life's journey has been diverse—spanning a bachelor's degree in fine art, thirty years as a practicing artist, an award-winning autobiography on human rights, a master's degree in education, former illustrator for prominent publications, a documentary on my life and art, a PhD exploring post-human realities, and the design and operation of a successful online business for two decades. Despite these accomplishments, I have been diagnosed with schizophrenia, ADHD, adjustment disorder, panic disorder, bipolar disorder, and suffer from a cognitive brain impairment resulting from a suicide attempt.

The suicide attempt wasn't a manifestation of mental illness but a response to the vilification I endured, a conspiracy against me, and intentional isolation from society. Shame, stigma, discrimination, and disparate treatment by both people and the government fueled the desperation that led to my attempt. Moreover, I was entangled in a coercive financial control and family violence orchestrated by my former partner, Steve Iasonidis—a criminal mastermind with ties to ASIO.

However, the gravest injustice lies in the refusal of any government agency, including ASIO, AGIS, the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Centrelink, the tax office, ASIC, APRA, AFSA, the Commonwealth Ombudsman, or the NACC, to acknowledge the existence of my relationship with Steve Iasonidis. This orchestrated denial perpetuates a false narrative, denies me rightful settlement, and signifies a deep-seated corruption within the system.

Recently, I endured a month of homelessness, my worldly possessions destroyed, living as a scapegoat with no legal or human rights as a targeted individual of the Australian government. My two-decade prosperity was systematically redacted in a politicized manner due to the lack of access to legal representation. Every decision affecting my financial wealth has been proven to be inequitable, illegal, and pre-determined to fail by design.

In this precarious position, I find myself unable to secure legal representation, labeled a failed whistleblower despite eligibility, and unable to report crime to the police. Infamously vilified as a vagrant with a real or perceived mental illness, I grapple with insufficient funds, food, medicine, healthcare, and support.

My life has been marked by hospitalizations orchestrated to silence me, with one occasion resulting in the disposal of my possessions and my forced relocation to a homeless shelter. A violent encounter with authorities further emphasized the orchestrated harm, serving as a warning to remain silent about my persecution and whistleblowing. In another chilling incident, I was violently beaten inside a hospital by a government-contracted assailant, exposing the dark underbelly of this elaborate conspiracy—a force that not only employs neglect and deceit but resorts to violence to demonize and harm its targets.

I have been subjected to unjust treatment, and a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice is undeniably underway. There is simply no other way to interpret the gravity of the situation. I find myself repeatedly robbed due to a lack of legal representation, resulting in a long list of detriments.

My human rights have been grossly abused, with an NDIS worker filing a report that no NDIS company is willing to endorse. The AHRC, tasked with protecting human rights, has regrettably refused to investigate.

The glaring truth is that I have been denied access and equality before the law throughout my fifty years, never having the opportunity to engage an impartial, fair, and unbiased lawyer capable of effecting meaningful change in any of my struggles.

Compounding the injustices, it is an undeniable fact that I was once engaged to be married to an ASIO agent. Strangely, this reality has never been acknowledged by any government agency, highlighting a disturbing pattern of oversight.

I am a targeted individual of the Australian government, and it is evident that the highest office in the land is complicit in my plight. A plea for meaningful intervention to the Prime Minister yielded a disappointing response. My narrative, evidence, and story were delegitimized, with a mere redirection to the Attorney General Mark Dreyfus' office. Despite my attempts to shed light on the corruption and exploitation orchestrated by my former partner Stefan Iasonidis, the system remains indifferent. AGIS and the Commonwealth Ombudsman, institutions designed to ensure justice, are already aware of the exploitation but have failed to address the lack of a fair and legal settlement pertaining to our five-year relationship.

Adding to the ordeal, my whistleblower status at the Commonwealth Ombudsman has been rendered futile, despite meeting all necessary attributes for a Public Interest Disclosure (PID). They have coldly refused all future correspondence, employing a 'delay, deny, defer' mantra to suppress acknowledgment of the issues at hand, shrouded behind layers of bureaucratic red tape that shields individuals from accountability.

Tangible evidence of my relationship with Stefan, including shared bank statements, five years of photos, and lease agreements from different properties, is dismissed. The government, in a perplexing turn, seems more inclined to protect him, choosing to vilify me for mental illness while neglecting the myriad socio-political factors contributing to my victimization and immense detriment.

My attempt to access information through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request from the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet was met with deception. An extension was granted on the grounds of the request being 'voluminous' and 'complex,' only to receive a blatantly false response claiming that 'no documents exist.'

I am now thrust into poverty, designed and destined to be exposed and vulnerable as a rejected whistleblower without protection. Police, instead of protecting me, have been weaponized to vilify me solely on the grounds of 'mental illness,' conveniently rejecting all crimes committed against me. Furthermore, the Federal Anti-Corruption Commission, meant to address corruption, has de-legitimized my complaint with absolute silence, raising serious concerns about its integrity.

The prime minister

It is certain that the highest office of the land is complicit. The prime minister refused to meaningfully intervene. I wrote to the prime minister with a letter. It detailing the situation of my victimisation, oppression, discrimination, my lack of access to a lawyer, my persecution, my financial detriments and my injustice to meaningfully intervene in my plight. His response was disappointing. He de-legitimised my story and my narrative and my evidence and instead directed me to the attorney general Mark Dreyfus’ office. He did not respond in a way that identified himself but public officials at his office referred me to investigate the corruption of an exploitation of me by former partner Stefan Iasonidis to AGIS who investigate ASIO and the Commonwealth Ombudsman. But AGIS are already aware of the exploitation of me by my former fiancé Stefan Iasonidis and the lack of a fair equitable and legal settlement settlement that is a legal obligation to seperate assets of the five years we were together. Additionally I am a failed whistleblower at the commonwealth ombudsman despite having the necessary attributes that make it possible to make a PID under the appropriate legislation and additionally they have refused all future correspondence from me. Delay, deny, defer is the Government mantra in order to deny traction of an issue they don’t eat to acknowledge and it is delivered hidden behind layers of bureaucracy that de identify individuals from accountability.

It is with the evidence that my relationship with him existed with bank statements in each others name, five years of photos, and lease agreements from two different properties that I can be certain that the government are protecting him in favour of vilifying me for mental illness to the exclusion of every other socio political factor that is existing in my life that has victimised me tortured me and caused my immense detriment.

I applied for my FOI from the office of prime minister and cabinet. An extension of time was requested because it was ‘voluminous’ and ‘complex’. My answer was returned in a blatant lie and deception that ‘no documents exist’

People with disability and the law; demanding representation

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity. It was ratified in 2008 in Australia as a foundation of this country underpinning all laws.

In particular in regard to Article 12 – Equal recognition before the law:

1. States Parties reaffirm that persons with disabilities have the right to recognition everywhere as persons before the law.

2. States Parties shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life.

3. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.

4. States Parties shall ensure that all measures that relate to the exercise of legal capacity provide for appropriate and effective safeguards to prevent abuse in accordance with international human rights law. Such safeguards shall ensure that measures relating to the exercise of legal capacity respect the rights, will and preferences of the person, are free of conflict of interest and undue influence, are proportional and tailored to the person’s circumstances, apply for the shortest time possible and are subject to regular review by a competent, independent and impartial authority or judicial body. The safeguards shall be proportional to the degree to which such measures affect the person’s rights and interests.

5. Subject to the provisions of this article, States Parties shall take all appropriate and effective measures to ensure the equal right of persons with disabilities to own or inherit property, to control their own financial affairs and to have equal access to bank loans, mortgages and other forms of financial credit, and shall ensure that persons with disabilities are not arbitrarily deprived of their property.

I am fifty years old and I have never had a lawyer. That is in defiance of the charter that Australia is a signatory and ratified in 2008. I demand an impartial one from the government as is their obligation to me under the charter.

My financial detriments over twenty years now proven as pre determined to fail; thats corruption

The list of financial detriments I have suffered over the years listed below have now been unequivocally proven to be decisions that have been pre determined to fail.

This deliberate redaction of all of my prosperity were all decisions made at government statutory agencies by lawyers who can be bought, corrupt public officials and supported by politicians too afraid to speak up and critique their tyrannical overlords who pay them handsomely to live in luxury and privilege and to never deviate from towing the party line.

I feel sorry for them for being restricted in their critical thinking and individual thought limited by the powers that pay/bribe them. I do not suffer the same restrictions as public officials and I never have and I never will. They all were and are decisions that were made by public officials and lawyers that were unethical illegal unbalanced biased immoral and brutally unfair to me.

I have never had access to the law and every Government agency has a whole raft of lawyers supporting the department or statutory authorities where I was doomed to fail for the decisions that redacted my prosperity with compensations settlements insurances and other financial windfalls.

The list as you can see below is long, over years and it identifies that a massive amount of financial detriment has been redacted from me in a way that has been systemic and political an brutally victimised me and robbed me. This has victimised me and victimisation is against the law.

Unfair termination settlement from the Age newspaper, $300000
Work cover settlement from 2004, $300000
Incorrect TPD payment from 2008, $500000
Medical malpractice settlement in 2017, $300000
HCF income assist settlement in 2021, $750000
Work Cover settlement in 2021, $750000
Provisional payments from work cover 2021, $50000
Business insurance payout 2021, $100000
Former partner settlement, $500000
Settlement for my cognitive brain impairment sustained inside a hospital the they owed a duty of care, $2500000
Sue for my business website maliciously destroyed, $100000,
Claim for loss after my worldly possessions were destroyed, $50000,
Detriments of over 2 million after being banned at AFCA, $20000000,
Detriments of over 1.5 million after insurance settlement was free kicked to opposition at AHRC, $15000000,
Money to pay for my accomodation blocked from arriving at the NDIS/A, $25000,
Child sexual abuse redress from DSS delayed denied deferred, $250000,
VOCAT case for child sexual abuse case cited by magistrate as ‘doomed’, $25000,
VOCAT case for violent affray in which I was hospitalised with broken bones and slashes for intervening and sticking up for a member of the public rejected, $25000
Compensated for being run over by a car (most likely a government vehicle), $50000
Compensation for being violently attacked inside a hospital by a not so undercover government thug, $200000
Compensation for a provable conspiracy to pervert the course of justice causing death, $300000
Compensation for the whitewashing of that tragedy by dozens of high ranking public officials who has a responsibility to act ethically with the public services act, $300000

I demand an end to my cruel degrading treatment punishment and torture

My treatment has been torture. I am demanding an end to my torture. I use the word ‘torture’ as per the definition in the ‘convention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of punishment’ that has been ratified by Australia and overseen by the UN under international law and treaty.

The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment that Australia is a signatory to states ‘For the purposes of this Convention, the term "torture" means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.’

This has been torture for me. Physical and mental suffering has been inflicted upon me to punish me for perceived ills. It has been enacted systemically and politically by de-legitimising my story experience and proof. Public officials act in defiance of the public service charter requiring them act ethically and within the law.

Title: A Desperate Plea for Justice: My Isolation and Struggle Against Systemic Oppression

Introduction:

As I sit here on Christmas Day in 2023, I find myself isolated and trapped in a nightmarish reality, a victim of a conspiracy to pervert justice orchestrated by the very government meant to protect me. This page stands as a testament to my life, marred by being cast as a scapegoat and targeted by the Australian Government.

The Systemic Oppression:

In this heart-wrenching narrative, I unveil a calculated plan by the government to ensure I never gain traction with any agency. This malicious strategy has led to financial persecution, pushing me into homelessness. It is a deliberate orchestration of destitution, amplifying the risk of self-harm and mental distress. Poverty becomes a tool in the government's arsenal, complicit in amplifying my mental illness.

Proof of the conspiracy:

In the labyrinth of bureaucratic indifference and institutional betrayal, my journey as a whistleblower has become a Sisyphean struggle, marked by perpetual rejection and isolation. Despite my earnest attempts to expose wrongdoing, the doors of justice remain resolutely closed, leaving me to navigate a Kafkaesque nightmare without legal support, protection, or recourse.

Silencing me

I stand as a failed whistleblower, a voice drowned out by the systemic deficiencies that undermine the very principles of transparency and accountability. The absence of legal representation has left me vulnerable, a lone individual seeking justice against a formidable system that seems designed to silence dissent.

Police as abusers

Even the avenue of law enforcement is fraught with peril, as the police, instead of upholding justice, weaponize the Mental Health Act against me. Rather than addressing my concerns, they choose to vilify me for my alleged illness, culminating in my unwarranted hospitalization. The very institution meant to protect citizens becomes a tool for suppression, exacerbating my plight.

The prime minister

Attempts to shed light on the malfeasance through the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (OPMC) have met with a stonewall. My Freedom of Information (FOI) request, initially described as 'voluminous' and 'complex,' is summarily rejected by the OPMC, claiming the nonexistence of relevant documents. This denial not only mocks the principles of transparency but further underscores the entrenched unwillingness to address my grievances.

Anti corruption commission is corrupt

I find myself blacklisted from the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), a stark manifestation of how those with power seek to protect themselves from scrutiny. Similarly, a ban from contacting the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denies me a channel for recourse against financial injustices.

Human rights commission elongating abuse

The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), entrusted with safeguarding human rights, turns a blind eye to my documented abuses by a National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) worker. The deafening silence from the AHRC further compounds the sense of helplessness in the face of systematic injustice.

The attorney general(s)

The office of the Attorney General, Mark Dreyfus, remains impervious to my cries for attention. Calls and emails echo into the void, ignored by those who should champion justice and uphold the rule of law.

The Ombudsman

The Commonwealth Ombudsman, purportedly a last resort for grievances against government bodies, has slammed its doors shut on me. Refusing all further correspondence, this institution designed to ensure accountability becomes yet another pillar of the bureaucracy indifferent to my plight.

As I grapple with the weight of rejection, the systemic failure to address my concerns not only undermines my faith in the very institutions meant to protect citizens but exposes the dire need for reform. In this narrative of abandonment, I persist in my pursuit of justice, a lone voice against a tide of institutional apathy.

Intentional Vilification and Mental Health:

I expose the intentional vilification for 'mental illness,' emphasizing the exclusion of socio-political factors affecting my life. The deliberate exacerbation of my mental illness, coupled with the suppression of my prosperity over the years, paints a bleak picture of an individual oppressed in a systemic and politicized manner.

Denied Legal Rights and Whistleblower Rejection:

My desperate plea for justice reveals a long and uphill battle against forces disproportionate to my effectiveness. I stand as a rejected whistleblower, opposing intentional torture and demanding its cessation. The denial of access to unbiased legal representation highlights a blatant violation of the human rights charter, challenging the very essence of equality before the law.

Conspiracy and Government Silence:

My attempt to expose the conspiracy leads to a trail of silence from government agencies. The rejection by the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the refusal of AGIS to investigate further demonstrate a deliberate attempt to silence my dissenting voice, perpetuating my suffering.

Human Rights Abuses and Homelessness:

My human rights have been abused, and legal rights obliterated, leading to infamy as a vagrant, ex-communicated from the Australian government. Homelessness becomes a bitter reality, as I navigate life in a car, fleeing not just from authorities but also from mental health services attempting forced hospitalization.

Demand for Justice:

With no wealth, no legal representation, and a laundry list of injustices, I demand an end to the cruel and degrading treatment. Referencing international agreements such as the Convention against Torture, I assert that the orchestrated torture has been politically motivated, a violation of fundamental human rights.

Conclusion:

This harrowing account sheds light on the darker side of systemic oppression, where a government's actions can strip an individual of their dignity, rights, and livelihood. As I call for justice and an end to my torment, this page stands as a haunting reminder of the ongoing struggle against a malevolent force that should be protecting its citizens.

Proof I am a Targeted individual

Previously I have earned enormous merit for my advocacy and altruism. But that was then and I had pissed off some powerful people. Now I unfortunately possess these qualities which have happened over time and now in retrospect my contacting all of them over years had been doomed to fail and the responses were informed in a way as to de legitimise my story my narrative my evidence in order to never elicit my prosperity being delivered. In doing so it has obliterated my human and legal rights.

I am a failed whistleblower,

I have never had a lawyer,

I cannot go to police because they utilise the mental health act to vilify me for illness and hospitalise me,

The OPMC refuse my FOI, citing no documents exist, when it was first described as ‘voluminous’ and ‘complex’.

I have been blacklisted from the NACC,

I am banned from contacting AFCA,

The AHRC refuse to investigate my documented human rights abuses by an NDIS worker,

The attorney general mark Dreyfus has ignored all myths calls and emails,

The Commonwealth Ombudsman has refused all further correspondence,

As a scapegoat the Government has become my nemesis and maybe always was. The Government nurtures the legal bar that oversees all lawyers. All things in society are ultimately under the auspice of the federal Government including insurance the banks human rights equality law and order and justice and health.

All of them have been worded up to act to my detriment.

I’ve lost all my insurances, the hospital is my jail, the community mental health team de-legitimise all my issues and like police vilify me for madness excluding everything else, no advocacy agency will stand for me, national mental health charities like SANE have ignored me when I was once their champion, the

Office of chief psychiatrist

The OPP

MCC, MHCC, Police, IBAC, The Victorian Inspectorate, AHPRA, NHPOPC, The Ombudsman,

VMIAC

List them

Maliciously, this took away everything I had including:

My business

My accreditation,

My human rights,

My access to the law,

My reputation,

My work cover,

My insurances,

My settlements,

My fair treatment,

My right to be treated impartially,

My ability to rent a home,

I have been violently attacked twice, once inside a hospital by a government contracted thug, this was obvious because he had my tattoo on his t-shirt before he attacked me. I was cornered, retaliated and smashed his teeth in broke his nose and smashed his head into the concrete. Strange a patient would not press charges. Why? The conspiracy that includes employing violence would be exposed.

Purpose of this letter

As my moral obligation to call out corruption to further the country

Paragraph

To present evidence of that corruption

(Do that inside chapters)

Have the evidence acknowledged and not ignored de-legitimised or pointedly neglected

To avoid being incarcerated in a psychiatric hospital and to stop persecution from police and the CAT team

To meet the criteria to have an assessment order, an individual must be a danger to himself or someone else. I am neither of those things. I am not delusional. I am not hearing voices. I am not suicidal.

To avoid being jailed with any crime I have either admitted to be forced to do or am framed by

The Cranbourne police have demanded that I front up to collect court documents. However I am unprepared to do this because I cannot trust police not to take me to hospital when they are acting on an order yet still no not acknowledge the crimes committed upon me systemically and politically.

If I am am jailed for crime I have either admitted to or I have been framed with and it is also true that the incredible amount of crime that has occurred to me is not acknowledge then this would be an absurd amount of hypocrisy. It would only serve to stand as my further persecution and that would be to silence me by incarceration in a jail to prevent me from speaking out about my treatment and corruption in the government as a failed whistleblower.

I demand protection.

Demand a home from the NDIS and to be able to live in a home free from persecution and victimisation from police and CAT team and of being a TI

Prove I am a targeted individual

As it currently stands ‘my own version of events’ as you described them as is not my existential opinion of my perception only unique to me but a phenomenon that can be demonstrated with evidence and absolute facts. Those are facts that render the following things:

I am a failed whistleblower,
I have never had a lawyer,
I cannot go to police because they utilise the mental health act to vilify me for illness and hospitalise me,
The OPMC refuse my FOI, citing no documents exist, when it was first described as ‘voluminous’ and ‘complex’.
I have been blacklisted from the NACC,
I am banned from contacting AFCA,
The AHRC refuse to investigate my documented human rights abuses by an NDIS worker,
The attorney general mark Dreyfus has ignored all myths calls and emails,
The Commonwealth Ombudsman has refused all further correspondence,

As a scapegoat the Government has become my nemesis and maybe always was. The Government nurtures the legal bar that oversees all lawyers.

All things in society are ultimately under the auspice of the federal Government including insurance the banks human rights equality law and order and justice and health.

Detail what they took from me as a TI in my persecution

Maliciously, this took away everything he had including:

His business,
His accreditation,
His human rights,
His access to the law,
His reputation,
His work cover,
His insurances,
His settlements,
His fair treatment,
His right to be treated impartially,
His ability to rent a home,

I not only had my home taken away, but its contents were destroyed as well. I found myself being force-medicated for what they dismissed as 'delusions of persecution,' which were, in reality, horrifyingly true. My privacy was invaded, subjected to constant surveillance, and I was banned from numerous social media platforms, including Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and more. They didn't stop there; they went on to obliterate my business website, which also held my Australian Business Number (ABN), and maliciously erased my digital identity crucial for online logins.

To add to the ordeal, they blocked my emails from various government agencies, denied my access to The Federal Court, and even refused my basic right to report crimes. Astonishingly, they went as far as blocking me from the Australian Federal Police (AFP) on Instagram. They didn't just stop at infringing on my rights; they took away my hope by intercepting my phone, controlling my contacts, and dictating who I could communicate with. Their actions escalated to remote planting of illegal content on my personal computer, encouraging harmful activities, and allowing drug use and abuse through neglect.

The denial of my ADHD medication, dexamphetamine, was a deliberate act causing severe harm. Their tactics included character assassination, severing ties with long-standing friends, intentional isolation, and the use of subsonic audio harassment for torture and debilitation. In their campaign against me, they lied about their commitment to my care, willfully vilified me for 'mental illness,' and subjected me to unspeakable torture. This conspiracy reached the depths of deception and covert intelligence, going so far as to hire a thug to violently attack me inside a public hospital.

All these actions collectively affirm that I am indeed a targeted individual (TI).

Prove my prosperity has been deliberately redacted from me

This has been a systemic and political movement that has maliciously redacted my prosperity over years ever since my autobiography on recovering from schizophrenia was published in 2022. The movement had prejudice and treated me differently and has literally robbed me over decades for the reason of never having any legal representation. It has ultimately taken my human rights and also obliterated my legal rights. I have suffered enormous and fatal detriment over years from my victimisation. Victimisation is against the law.

Decisions about these determinations are made at government agencies and companies and institutions who have access to a whole raft of lawyers. Therefore all decisions leading to my financial detriment have been corrupt inequitable unethical and illegal and have acted outside legal principles.

Unfair Termination Settlement from The Age Newspaper: $300,000
WorkCover Settlement from 2004: $300,000
Incorrect TPD Payment from 2008: $500,000
Medical Malpractice Settlement in 2017: $300,000
HCF Income Assist Settlement in 2021: $750,000
WorkCover Settlement in 2021: $750,000
Provisional Payments from WorkCover in 2021: $50,000
Business Insurance Payout in 2021: $100,000
Former Partner Settlement: $500,000
Settlement for Cognitive Brain Impairment: $2,500,000
Lawsuit for Malicious Destruction of Business Website: $100,000
Claim for Loss after Possessions Destroyed: $50,000
Detriments after Being Banned at AFCA: $20,000,000
Detriments after Insurance Settlement at AHRC: $15,000,000
Money Blocked from NDIS/A for Accommodation: $25,000
Child Sexual Abuse Redress from DSS: $250,000
VOCAT Case for Child Sexual Abuse: $25,000
VOCAT Case for Violent Affray: $25,000
Compensation for Being Run Over: $50,000
Compensation for Violent Hospital Attack: $200,000
Compensation for Conspiracy to Pervent Justice: $300,000
Compensation for Whitewashing Tragedy: $300,000

That is approximately $43,750,000

When you politically and systemically remove an individuals access to prosperity and money it creates suffering and designs an individuals poverty. In that way it can be proven my poverty is by design and not a reflection of any character flaw I have or lack of passion or hard work. It has a conscious way of amplifying mental health trauma and suffering because it is widely acknowledged in the literature that finance/money and housing are the two main factors that affect a persons mental well being.

Prove my human rights have been abused

AHRC refuse to investigate this document reporting my human right abuses by and NDIS worker.

I was violently attacked inside a hospital by a government thug.

My financial health has been decimated and that is proven.

I demand access to justice

Article 13 – Access to justice

1. States Parties shall ensure effective access to justice for persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others, including through the provision of procedural and age-appropriate accommodations, in order to facilitate their effective role as direct and indirect participants, including as witnesses, in all legal proceedings, including at investigative and other preliminary stages.

2. In order to help to ensure effective access to justice for persons with disabilities, States Parties shall promote appropriate training for those working in the field of administration of justice, including police and prison staff.

Justice to me isn’t about lots of money. Justice to me is at the bare minimum living in a safe home with my dog with enough provisions for food for medicine and freedom from persecution by police or health authorities.

Demanding my identification as a TI stop

To act with neglect or silence now after reading this is complicity in my persecution.

I have been protesting my persecution as a targeted individual of The Australian Government on YouTube.

In particular in regard to Article 12 – Equal recognition before the law:

1. States Parties reaffirm that persons with disabilities have the right to recognition everywhere as persons before the law.

2. States Parties shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life.

3. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.

I am fifty years old and I have never had a lawyer. That is in defiance of the charter that Australia is a signatory and ratified in 2008.

Removing my prosperity has been a way I have known that I am a targeted individual of the Australian government.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) Australia has ratified in 2008 and a signatory to, is to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.

I have had no dignity.

Article 40 of the CRPD stipulates that States Parties (signatories to the Convention such as Australia) shall meet regularly in a Conference of States Parties (COSP). This is to consider any matter with regard to the implementation of the Convention. Since 2008, the COSP has been held annually at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, covering a range of themes and issues in round-tables, interactive dialogues and side-events.

A targeted individual becomes such usually for reasons of being a terrorist or a threat to national security and the situation has to be dealt with by the powers that be. Ordinarily jail would befall a known terrorist, incarceration would become a fate for the criminally insane who is a threat to himself or someone else or otherwise is a threat to the government, alternately to silence the said individual the government may decide to treat them with such contempt and via ‘no touch torture’.

That is a method destroy their lives that they create the conditions for either drug addiction or channel them into crime or drive them mad or vilify them for madness and actually be the cause of such neglect they suicide from neglect or from the torture.

When an individuals money is intentionally removed redacted or prevented from getting to them the action is not singularly only about removing their money. You need money to exist in society. Removing their money is an action with an intention to act in order to harm them by removing their power and position in society. The allegory of tpreventing someones access to money could be seen as akin to an intention to cause harm. The ultimate form of harm to an individual is kill Them. That is murder.

I made an affirdavid and statutory declaration a few months ago and published it on YouTube out of desperation of my situation as someone who has had all their prosperity removed or prevented from being in receipt of money. The video was a desperate attempt in order to try and protect myself from further persecution from in the first instance police and the health department which had signed an order for me tube hospitalised fop assessment.

Was this you? If it was it de-legitimised what I was saying and of course was ineffective at providing a solution to my situation. It could be seen as you being interested in me as the targeted individual and victim and then trolling me by leaving your comment. That is a form of online abuse.

2. States Parties shall ensure that if persons with disabilities are deprived of their liberty through any process, they are, on an equal basis with others, entitled to guarantees in accordance with international human rights law and shall be treated in compliance with the objectives and principles of the present Convention, including by provision of reasonable accommodation.

There is no reason why I as a person with a disability should not live in reasonable accomodation.

For the NDIS: In regards to my SILS application with the NDIS:

I need the NDIS to urgently grant me a SILS package

Ymy life is at risk.

It is necessary to oppose an imminent risk to my health welfare safety and life that has been documented by the Federal Court.

It will provide me with the vital and necessary support I require (to) for my disability(s).

My disabilities are chronic and lifelong.

My persecution on a political and systemic level by the Government is conformed and proven with evidence on this page which§h must be acknowledged.

My persecution is consciously orchesrated knowingly putting me at risk of suicide from a malicious systemic neglect.

SILS will provide reasonable accomodation that satisfies NDIS guidelines.

SILS can provide what United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) states in Article 14 – Liberty and security of person that Australia is a signatory to and has ratified in 2008 that: 2. States Parties shall ensure that if persons with disabilities are deprived of their liberty through any process, they are, on an equal basis with others, entitled to guarantees in accordance with international human rights law and shall be treated in compliance with the objectives and principles of the present Convention, including by provision of reasonable accommodation.

Regarding statement 2. above it is appreciated and expected that the NDIS acknowledge the proof that I have become a targeted individual of the Australian Government.

Liberty is defined as the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behaviour, or political views. My liberty has been oppressed by the government authorities.

It is critical to acknowledge my documented human rights abuses by an NDIS worker.

It needs to be acknowledged that I am a person deprived of my liberty via my political scapegoating and therefore am entitled to guarantees including by provision of reasonable accomodation as per (UNCRPD).

The NDIS is required to acknowledge I am a victim of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and further that the source of persecution and my nemesis IS the Government. Further that my claimed persecution is not a ‘delusion of persecution’ requiring medicine or hospitalisation but a phenomenon proven below with facts. These facts collectively render my victimisation which has tortured me

NDIS is required to accept that as a statutory authority they are part of a government portfolio that has been informed to treat me differently. The NDIS is already conscious of my documented human rights abuses and been complicit in my continued poverty and persecution. At the same time the NDIS have obliged to provide some support to me in the provision of my NDIS plan

The NDIS needs to acknowledge the hypocrisy of this situation in granting me SILS.

SILS accomodation is vital to guarantee support regarding my disability, my well being, my health, my safety and freedom from threats of violence and continued persecution described and proven below.

I need help because of these reasons

All avenues of mainstream support have proven to be exhausted in order to provide me accomodation and for the support I need regarding my disability which is directly a reason for my recent homelessness.

This is because of a proven conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in which I am a targeted individual of the Australian Government.

I am a failed whistleblower, I have never had a lawyer, and I cannot report crime to police.

My problem is directly disability related and the SILS application will need to provide for my accomodation with 24 hr supports. This is because I have been brutally financially persecuted and have no money.

It is clear from seven hospitalisations in three years of different locations that I am unable to look after myself and that I have been a risk to myself with suicidal ideation repeatedly.

It is clear of my profound disability in which I need accomodation and support because the lack of accomodation is directly relational to my disability.

I cannot work because I already suffered a psychological injury at work. I suffered this psychological injury in 2021 relating to a corrupt magistrate and my VOCAT case for my childhood sexualisation / abuse which in hindsight was a corrupt decision to deny my claim.

For reason of financial abuse which deliberately is intended to amplify my vulnerability

I have been financially abused for years underpinned by the federal government and all my compensations, determinations, settlements, winnings, other financial windfalls in hindsight being consciously and intentionally redacted from even getting to me and this is due to the fact of never having a lawyer despite searching hard for one. Every decision was made by a party that had access to the law and they were all decided at government agencies which also have access to litigation advice. What can be proven now in hindsight is that this redaction of my prosperity was not merely coincidental to have failed time after time but it had been intelligently designed by the government to fail for reasoning of me being psychometrically profiled by the government and every attempt at legal help was thwarted.

I feel sorry for them, and the recipients of this letter for being restricted in their critical thinking limited by the powers that pay/bribe them. I do not suffer the same restrictions as you and I never have and I never will.

They all were and are decisions that were unethical illegal unbalanced biased immoral and brutally unfair to me. I have never had access to the law and every Government agency has a whole raft of lawyers supporting the department or statutory authorities were doomed to fail for me prior to ‘decisions’ being handed to me.

The list as you can see is long and it identifies that a massive amount of financial detriment has been redacted from me in a way that has brutally victimised me. Victimisation is against the law.

Unfair termination settlement from the Age newspaper, $300000

Work cover settlement from 2004, $300000

Incorrect TPD payment from 2008, $500000

Medical malpractice settlement in 2017, $300000

HCF income assist settlement in 2021, $750000

Work Cover settlement in 2021, $750000

Provisional payments from work cover 2021, $50000

Business insurance payout 2021, $100000

Former partner settlement, $500000

Settlement for my cognitive brain impairment sustained inside a hospital the they owed a duty of care, $2500000

Sue for my business website maliciously destroyed, $100000,

Claim for loss after my worldly possessions were destroyed, $50000,

Detriments of over 2 million after being banned at AFCA, $20000000,

Detriments of over 1.5 million after insurance settlement was free kicked to opposition at AHRC, $15000000,

Money to pay for my accomodation blocked from arriving at the NDIS/A, $25000,

Child sexual abuse redress from DSS delayed denied deferred, $250000,

VOCAT case for child sexual abuse case cited by magistrate as ‘doomed’, $25000,

VOCAT case for violent affray in which I was hospitalised with broken bones and slashes for intervening and sticking up for a member of the public rejected, $25000

Compensated for being run over by a car (most likely a government vehicle), $50000

Compensation for being violently attacked inside a hospital by a not so undercover government thug, $200000

Compensation for a provable conspiracy to pervert the course of justice causing death, $300000

Compensation for the whitewashing of that tragedy by dozens of high ranking public officials who has a responsibility to act ethically with the public services act, $300000

The total value of the listed detriments amounts to around $40,975,000.

I have attempted to gain compensation at the CDDC scheme for administrative errors of statutory government agencies but was told by the department of finance’s Simon Birmingham that I will never receive compensation from the department of finance. This is indicative of corruption and it is brutally unfair and has an aim not only to take my money but to cause harm to me. The extreme end of harm is murder or killing me, and I have literally already died by suicide in Feb 2021 but was revived from certain death.

This was and still is systemic and politicised financial abuse with a malice not to actually directly murder me but still create the conditions via design of my destitution which was known to put me in a position of existential risk of killing myself from the neglect which was an intended neglect by all concerned. The neglect occurred in politicised and systemic ways in decisions by dozens of corrupt public officials who were often de identified through layers of beaurocracy.

The conspiracy I am victimised by is very easily demonstratable in the following fact: That no government agency will even acknowledge my five year relationship with former ASIO employee Stefan Iasonidis ever existed. This would lead to a legal equitable and fair settlement of assets from a relationship in which I had been exploited and the chief of ASIO David Irvine was complicit in the abuse. The non acknowledgement by any government agency is despite my concrete evidence that it did exist. This deception is corruption and it de legitimises my experience and voice and needs and obliterates what was reality into a preferred reality of the Government. The government act with deception and lies and abuse me in order to protect Iasonidis his money and his prosperity and reputation. This is in favour of vilifying me for mental illness whether it existed or not to the exclusion of all other socio political issues affecting me and simultaneously intentionally amplifying the existing illness. This has been conscious and it has been cruel. De legitimising my evidence and experience of what is a fact and actually happened is a method of gaslighting which is a form emotional abuse. It is cruelly enacted politically right from the top and designed to destabilise and confuse me who’s the victim.

Since my whistleblowing efforts and the opposition to my oppression and injustices have gone public on YouTube and I have acted to make the government acknowledge my detriment, I received a notification via a carriage service on Grindr Iasonidis was done for embezzlement of his corrupt finances of a million dollars. Then there was a threat to kill both me and my beloved dog. I have been unable to report this to police and this is also corruption and my attempt at an AVO was rejected.

I have been treated differently and financially abused systemically and politically over decades since the publication of my autobiography ‘recovered not cured a journey though schizophrenia’ which was both celebrated in ways and highly acclaimed and others who utilised is as a means to justify my unfair treatment. It was used to fire me discriminate against me or later in life examine my vulnerabilities so the federal government could weaponise vulnerabilities I described in detail against me.

My human rights abuses victimisation oppression and profoundly unfair treatment has been documented by NDIS worker after he observed my life for months but no NDIS provider reported it and it is their obligation to me as a person with a disability wit a contract to them under the NDIS code of conduct.

The AHRC refuses to investigate the documented human rights abuse because it is now proven to be the government orchestrating my suffering elongating my poverty which is by design and condoning and amplifying my suffering. This persecution that can be proven to exist at a scenic government level along with my disability has been the reason why from 1st Nov 2023 continuing for the next month and a bit I had become an infamous vagrant who lived in my car on the run from police who were trying to weaponise the mental health act to incarcerate me in hospital. I barely had enough food or medicine and I had no care from any psychologist psychiatrist or even a GP and I desperately was trying to gain access to care.

My disability:

I have an acute mental illness been diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia

I have been diagnosed withADHD

I have been diagnosed with adjustment disorder

13.01.2023 A report documented the presence of a neurodegenerative process:

‘Major decline in his mental health, resulting in a high-level of functional disability’

‘He was referred for neuropsychological assessment by Dr Thomas Carlyon-Stewart (HMO,

CMB) for characterisation of his cognitive profile and for diagnostic clarification about the presence of a

neurodegenerative process.

On the current assessment, Richard's cognitive profile is characterised by variable speed of information

processing, reduced verbal new learning and memory, and executive difficulties (including difficulties

with planning/organisational skills, self-monitoring and set-shifting).

There are several factors likely to be affecting Richard's performances on current testing, including his

history of schizophrenia, recent psychotic relapse, ADHD, past history of trauma and methamphetamine

dependence (over the past 2-3 years). These factors have likely led to a major decline in his mental

health, resulting in a high-level of functional disability. There did not appear to be any convincing

evidence on current testing to suggest a primary memory disorder or an emerging progressive

neurodegenerative process at this point of time. Richard's cognitive difficulties are most likely to be

associated with his longstanding history of schizophrenia and his methamphetamine dependence (over

the past 2-3 years).

Recommendations:

Due to his extremely poor insight and judgement as well as his compromised cognitive

functioning, Richard remains highly vulnerable to exploitation and misadventure. Based on the

current assessment findings, an NDIS plan review is strongly supported to advocate for

additional funding to assist with Richard's care needs. More specifically, he will need assistance

with domestic tasks (cleaning, laundry, shopping and meal preparation), social engagement and

community access. His care needs will be most appropriately met in supported accommodation.

Richard has an existing NDIS plan, however, due to the change of circumstances, I strongly

recommend an NDIS plan review meeting to consider and include the following additional

supports of his new NDIS plan:

• Increasing one-to-one support workers: Richard will benefit from having additional

hours of support workers who have experience working with people with mental health

conditions. This will help him engage ni community activities of his interest.

• Occupational Therapy input (Improved Daily Living funding): Richard requires Improved

Daily Living funding for Occupational Therapy or support a successful transition, provide

training and support to staff. He will also benefit from having an OT functional capacity

assessment.’

No touch torture

The definition "No-touch torture" is a deliberate deployment of psychological torture techniques that seek to inflict severe mental and emotional distress on me without direct physical contact. The aim is to break my (the victim’s) will, induce extreme stress, and create a sense of powerlessness. This form of torture often relies on psychological manipulation, sensory deprivation, and various stress-inducing methods. While it does not involve physical harm, its impact can be profound and long-lasting.

Targeted individual of the Australian government

The series of legal, political, systemic, and health-related issues outlined below vividly illustrate a deliberate and sustained campaign against an individual, resulting in severe personal and existential detriments. This orchestrated effort encompasses a range of injustices, revealing a systematic abuse of power and a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Intentional Redaction of Prosperity:

The victim has faced intentional deprivation of prosperity, a consequence of decisions made by government agencies and corrupt individuals. These decisions were pre-determined to fail, with a lack of access to legal help compounding the victim's struggles, contrary to the human rights charter for persons with disabilities.

Conspiracies and Character Assassination:

The victim has been systematically conspired against, enduring character assassination that further extends to the deliberate isolation experienced during a traumatic stay in a psychiatric institution. Attempts at suicide, resulting from financial abuse and family violence, were downplayed across government agencies, leaving the victim with a cognitive impairment.

Government Agencies' Complicity:

Despite the victim's extensive list of unethical, illegal, and biased decisions, government agencies, including the legal fraternity, police, ombudsman's office, and the PID scheme, uniformly reject, ignore, or neglect evidence and correspondence. This systematic rejection suggests a conspiracy to silence and de-legitimize the victim's claims.

Violent Attacks and Forced Relocation:

The victim was violently attacked within a hospital, subsequently forced to flee his home by police, creating conditions preventing him from reporting incidents. A subsequent vehicular assault, targeting both the victim and his dog, highlights the extreme measures taken against him.

Covert Surveillance and Threats:

The victim's suspicions of constant surveillance are reinforced by encounters with a violent dog, possibly strategically placed as a threat. Threats to harm the victim's dog and living in constant fear of violence contribute to the overall atmosphere of coercion.

Psychological Torture and Neglect:

The victim, diagnosed with schizophrenia, endures a form of psychological torture known as "no-touch torture." This includes manipulation, isolation, sensory deprivation, threats, and humiliation, all contributing to severe mental and emotional distress. The victim's resilience in the face of this relentless persecution is noteworthy.

Intent to Kill and Ongoing Persecution:

The victim describes an intent to kill, a malice evident in the orchestration of events leading to a suicide attempt and subsequent ongoing persecution. The world's complicity through silence and neglect in the face of existential risks exacerbates the victim's suffering.

Conspiracy to Pervert Justice:

This pattern of malice, violence, and neglect, persisting across various sectors, serves as evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The victim, surviving as a murder victim, continues to face de-legitimization, torture, and an elevated risk of suicide due to poverty, deceit, and corruption.

In conclusion, the victim's harrowing narrative underscores the urgent need for intervention and justice, as complicity through silence only perpetuates a profound injustice.

United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) which Australia ratified in 2008 into the fabric of this democracy States :

Article 12 – Equal recognition before the law

1. States Parties reaffirm that persons with disabilities have the right to recognition everywhere as persons before the law.

2. States Parties shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life.

3. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.

I therefore demand an impartial unbiased lawyer and the government take ‘appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.’

The NDIS must first acknowledge the conspiracy and their place in it. They then must provide for my supported accomodation in a SILS package moving forward because all other options of mainstream support have been tried or deigned to fail me and exhausted.

There is no possible way now that I will able to get the supported accomodation that I need in order to be safe from exploitation and violence and persecution by the police and by the health sector who only seemliness and vilify me to the exclusion of all other factors.

I also am under threat of murder by Iasonidis and his threat to kill me and my dog and therefore an AVO must be put in place immediately and my location of any accomodation with my SILS must be kept secret and be private as per the charter:

Article 22 – Respect for privacy

1. No person with disabilities, regardless of place of residence or living arrangements, shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence or other types of communication or to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation. Persons with disabilities have the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

2. States Parties shall protect the privacy of personal, health and rehabilitation information of persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.

This accomodation in a SILS package is needed urgently not only because of that my housing directly relates to my disability but this is needed literally for my very survival as a human being because I have been pushed to the edge and I will not survive any more torture or neglect from the government that has been so intelligently designed orchestrated and inhumanely cruel.

The government are attempting to stop me from speaking out:

Absolutely the Government is able to frame me with either being a pedophile, an extortionist or a rapist. All have been demonstrated to me via the V2K projections and persecutionary voices which have harassed me over years in my car home in the street and wherever I go. This is an invasion of privacy and brutal human rights abuse as well and utilises highly sophisticated technology that is unacknowledged in the public domain in order to torture the targeted individual via wearing them down deliberately and emotionally with a malice to cause either their madness or cause their suicide.

This intelligent persecution of me across all dimensions has proven to aim to design my ultimate demise with no touch torture.It occurs with zero liability of anyone and vilifies and blames me as the one responsible for my demise or my harm or my suicide attempt. It is coercive and it is deceitful and has proven to employ an intention of violence to befall me yet still cleverly exonerate all liability of those who have orchestrated it or who condone it by neglecting to act or by unethical conduct.

That my abuse is violent is evidence of a secretly violent intelligent government plan to harm maim or kill and that is an absurd injustice and categorically wrong.

It can be deducted therefore that they will stop at nothing in order to silence me from calling out this profound corruption.

Methods they will employ or have employed as a way to silence me and stop my voice is by no touch torture in which my persecution is unethically rigged to cause me maximum damage to my mind and confidence and my resolve. This method has been used in order to elicit my probably and very possible suicide by a sustained attack of profound neglect. The following words are exemplary of why this and my treatment has been a violation of international law:

"No-touch torture" refers to a form of psychological torture where physical contact is not involved, yet the individual experiences severe mental and emotional distress. This method is considered unethical for several reasons:

Violation of Human Rights: No-touch torture often involves techniques that infringe upon basic human rights, including the right to be free from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.

Mental and Emotional Harm: The techniques employed in no-touch torture are designed to induce extreme psychological stress, fear, and trauma. This can lead to severe and lasting mental health issues, violating the principle of promoting overall well-being.

Lack of Informed Consent: Victims are often subjected to these methods without their informed consent, violating the ethical principle of autonomy. Informed consent ensures individuals have the right to know and understand the potential consequences of any procedures or treatments.

Potential for Permanent Damage: Prolonged exposure to no-touch torture techniques can lead to severe and sometimes irreversible mental health damage, which is inconsistent with the principle of minimizing harm.

Dehumanization: The methods employed in no-touch torture often aim to dehumanize the individual, treating them as objects rather than respecting their inherent dignity. Dehumanization is considered ethically reprehensible.

Violation of International Law: Many forms of no-touch torture, particularly those involving psychological and emotional manipulation, are prohibited by international laws and conventions, such as the United Nations Convention Against Torture.

Potential for False Confessions: No-touch torture may lead to coerced confessions or false information, as individuals may say or do anything to stop the psychological torment, undermining the reliability of any information obtained.

Ethical Duty of Care: Individuals who engage in no-touch torture, whether as part of governmental or organizational practices, violate the ethical duty of care toward the well-being and mental health of others.

Ineffectiveness and Unreliability: No-touch torture techniques may be ineffective in obtaining accurate information, as the extreme stress and fear induced can cloud an individual's ability to provide reliable information.

Moral and Ethical Principles: The use of no-touch torture goes against fundamental moral and ethical principles, including respect for human dignity, justice, and the obligation to prevent harm.

In summary, no-touch torture is widely considered unethical due to its severe impact on individuals' mental and emotional well-being, its violation of basic human rights, and its inconsistency with fundamental ethical principles.

Character assassination:

Spreading False Rumors: Creating and spreading false information about an individual, such as engaging in illegal activities, engaging in immoral behavior, or having a fabricated personal history.

Manipulating Social Media: Using fake accounts or bots to spread negative information, rumors, or misleading narratives about the targeted individual on social media platforms.

Leaking Personal Information: Disclosing private and sensitive information, such as personal documents, emails, or compromising photos, without consent to damage the individual's reputation.

Fabricating Incriminating Evidence: Creating false documents, photos, or videos to make it appear as if the individual has engaged in illegal or immoral activities.

Selective Editing: Taking statements out of context or selectively editing audio and video recordings to distort the meaning of what the individual said or did.

Anonymous Smear Campaigns: Initiating smear campaigns through anonymous letters, emails, or websites to attack the individual without revealing the identity of the source.

Infiltrating Personal Relationships: Planting individuals or informants in the target's social circles to gather information and create situations that can be used against them.

False Accusations: Making baseless accusations of serious wrongdoing, such as criminal activity, without any evidence to support the claims.

Employment Sabotage: Sabotaging the individual's professional life by spreading false information to employers, colleagues, or clients, potentially leading to job loss or professional damage.

Cyberbullying: Engaging in online harassment, including sending threatening messages, creating defamatory content, or encouraging others to do the same.

Gaslighting: Manipulating the individual's perception of reality to make them doubt their own experiences, sanity, or credibility.

It's crucial to emphasize that engaging in character assassination is not only morally wrong but can also lead to legal consequences, including defamation lawsuits. Ethical behavior involves addressing concerns through legitimate means, respecting the rights of individuals, and upholding principles of fairness and justice.

Vilify me with an already existing and publicly described mental illness whether it is active and present or not which in effect weaponises my former brave narrative detailing my vulnerabilities and exclude and delegitimise every other socio political factor and evidence relating to my case.

It is important to clarify that any attempt to vilify me for their mental illness, especially for the purpose of punishment or retaliation, is unethical and illegal. I have rights to privacy, and stigmatizing or weaponizing mental health conditions is not only harmful but goes against ethical principles and legal protections.

Here are the unethical ways health authorities and individuals and the government have vilified me for my mental illness:

Selective Disclosure: Deliberately highlighting and exaggerating specific aspects of the individual's mental health history, taking them out of context to create a distorted and negative narrative.

False Documentation: Creating fabricated documents or reports that falsely represent the severity of the individual's mental health condition or imply dangerous behavior.

Anonymous Tips: Sending anonymous tips to health authorities or law enforcement, alleging erratic or harmful behavior by the individual without any factual basis.

Infiltration of Support Networks: Planting individuals within the individual's support network to gather information or spread misinformation that contributes to a negative perception of their mental health.

Selective Reporting: Media outlets or online platforms selectively reporting on incidents related to the individual's mental health, emphasizing negative aspects and downplaying any positive or mitigating factors.

Psychological Manipulation: Engaging in gaslighting or psychological manipulation to make the individual doubt their own mental health stability, contributing to a narrative of instability.

Institutional Gaslighting: Health authorities or institutions dismissing the individual's claims of corruption or injustice as symptoms of their mental illness, thereby discrediting their concerns.

Coercive Interventions: Encouraging individuals close to the person to stage interventions or involuntary commitments under the guise of concern for their well-being, when the true motivation is punitive or suppressive.

It's crucial to reiterate that these actions are not ethical, and they may violate privacy laws and human rights. In reality, mental health conditions should be approached with empathy, understanding, and adherence to ethical guidelines that prioritize the well-being and rights of the individual. In cases where someone believes they are being targeted unfairly, seeking legal advice and support is recommended.

To put me in jail. They would do this by framing me with crime that I have already admitted to or that I felt I has at least a fraction of accountability for or frame me with any crime they can by intelligent design that has an intention of stitching me up and putting me in jail. If this happened it would be an incredible injustice and hypocrisy that victimises me who is already a victim and would likely not acknowledge the profound amount of crime and detriment dealt to me. The has been committed by police and by public officials and by lawyers and by politicians in decisions insulated that de identifies them in smoke and mirrors of bureaucracy.

The purpose of this letter is to seek a personalized response from the NDIS minister with the urgent request for accommodation for both Crystal and me. This request should be addressed within the framework of the NDIS, considering the significant detriment I have endured, the political scapegoating I have faced, and the substantial prosperity that has been unjustly withheld from me. The plea for a home is grounded in the undeniable hardships I have faced, and it is imperative that the NDIS minister acknowledges the gravity of this situation.

In the event that the NDIS minister chooses to reject these fundamental human rights demands, I am left with no recourse but to pursue legal action. I will instruct my lawyer to initiate a lawsuit with the intent to cause maximum damage, holding the minister accountable for her complicity in my proven victimization. This legal action is part of a broader response to the government conspiracy outlined and substantiated on this page. It is my fervent hope that a fair and just resolution can be reached through diplomatic channels, but I am prepared to take necessary legal measures to ensure my rights are upheld and justice is served.

The reason I have called out corruption of public officials in this country is so I can literally survive as a human being ear marked for destruction and it is my moral obligation as a democratic citizen with a free criminal record for the benefit of our democracy and to foster trust in the powers that be and for the rule of law being both ethical and equitable and for it to be fair.

I am still after literally being murdered with no touch torture still Seeking Justice or Accountability: It iOS for the purpose of Exposing the governments harmful actions to be over years .

I am driven by a desire for justice and accountability and also so I am not forced to live in my car as a person with chronic illness again as I did for over a month in November 2023. I believe it is important to shed light on the truth and ensure that those responsible face the consequences for their actions.

>>>>>

The reason I have exposed the corruption of public officials in this country is to ensure my literal survival as a human being marked for destruction. It is my moral obligation as a democratic citizen with a clean criminal record to contribute to the betterment of our democracy, fostering trust in the powers that be and advocating for an ethical, equitable, and fair rule of law.

Even after enduring what could be described as murder through "no-touch torture," I continue to seek justice and accountability. My motivation extends beyond personal vindication; it is driven by a desire to expose the harmful actions of the government over the years. I am resolute in my pursuit of justice and accountability, not only for my own sake but to prevent the recurrence of circumstances that led me to live in my car for over a month in November 2023 due to chronic illness. Shedding light on the truth is paramount, ensuring that those responsible face the consequences for their actions and upholding the principles of justice and accountability.

>>>>

As an individual with a disability diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia, ADHD, adjustment disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety, panic disorder, and a brain impairment affecting memory – a result of a suicide attempt inside Werribee Mercy Hospital due to persecution, victimization, financial abuse, isolation, and vilification, not solely due to mental illness – I find myself homeless, residing in my car. Faced with dire circumstances, I applied for an emergency payment from my Centrelink disability support pension, only to be told over a call that I "don't qualify."

This rejection epitomizes the chronic financial neglect and victimization I endure from the Australian government, who are evidently aware that their actions are causing me harm. This systematic deprivation of prosperity has been ongoing for years, with the intent to inflict maximum damage to my financial health, potentially leading to neglect that could maim, destroy, or even result in my death.

The orchestrated financial abuse existed well before my suicide attempt, revealing a politicized and systemic intention. This implies that the "fatal" injury I suffered was consciously intended, constituting a malicious, tyrannical government conspiracy that essentially murdered me. Even after being subjected to what can only be described as "no-touch torture," I am still seeking justice, accountability, and the basic human rights owed to me.

This webpage serves as evidence of the financial detriments orchestrated against me, establishing my status as a targeted individual. It also aims to prompt a response and resolution from the government or the NDIS, seeking accommodation and protection due to threats from my violent former partner. Beyond basic human rights, I am owed millions, a situation proven with facts to negotiate a resolution.

If the NDIS minister rejects my basic human rights demands, I will instruct my lawyer to sue her, aiming to cause maximum damage for her complicity in my proven victimization, part of the broader government conspiracy outlined and proven on this page.

>>>

In future iterations of AI, the comprehensive analysis of available data will likely provide a clearer understanding of my experiences and exonerate me from any wrongdoing. The advancements in technology and data processing may reveal patterns and evidence that support the assertion that I was a targeted individual. If, for any unfortunate reason, this pursuit of justice proves to be a challenging or perilous endeavor for me, it stands as a testament to my lifelong commitment to opposing injustice. I believe that a life dedicated to advocating for fairness and uncovering truth is a life worth living, and I anticipate that future generations will celebrate these efforts as a contribution to the ongoing pursuit of a just and equitable society.

Article 15 – Freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

1. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his or her free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

2. States Parties shall take all effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent persons with disabilities, on an equal basis with others, from being subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

I have been subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

I have been unfairly punished and victimised.

The government is now under obligation under the charter to intervene in an effective legislative, administrative, judicial way.

Article 16 – Freedom from exploitation, violence and abuse

1. States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social, educational and other measures to protect persons with disabilities, both within and outside the home, from all forms of exploitation, violence and abuse, including their gender-based aspects.

2. States Parties shall also take all appropriate measures to prevent all forms of exploitation, violence and abuse by ensuring, inter alia, appropriate forms of gender- and age-sensitive assistance and support for persons with disabilities and their families and caregivers, including through the provision of information and education on how to avoid, recognize and report instances of exploitation, violence and abuse. States Parties shall ensure that protection services are age-, gender- and disability-sensitive.

3. In order to prevent the occurrence of all forms of exploitation, violence and abuse, States Parties shall ensure that all facilities and programmes designed to serve persons with disabilities are effectively monitored by independent authorities.

4. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote the physical, cognitive and psychological recovery, rehabilitation and social reintegration of persons with disabilities who become victims of any form of exploitation, violence or abuse, including through the provision of protection services. Such recovery and reintegration shall take place in an environment that fosters the health, welfare, self-respect, dignity and autonomy of the person and takes into account gender- and age-specific needs.

5. States Parties shall put in place effective legislation and policies, including women- and child-focused legislation and policies, to ensure that instances of exploitation, violence and abuse against persons with disabilities are identified, investigated and, where appropriate, prosecuted.

I have been exploited violently attacked and abused.

Article 17 – Protecting the integrity of the person

Every person with disabilities has a right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity on an equal basis with others.

I have had my physical and mental integrity consciously damaged or impaired.

Article 22 – Respect for privacy

2. States Parties shall protect the privacy of personal, health and rehabilitation information of persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.

My privacy has been violated.

Article 25 – Health

States Parties recognize that persons with disabilities have the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health without discrimination on the basis of disability. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure access for persons with disabilities to health services that are gender-sensitive, including health-related rehabilitation. In particular, States Parties shall:

a) Provide persons with disabilities with the same range, quality and standard of free or affordable health care and programmes as provided to other persons, including in the area of sexual and reproductive health and population-based public health programmes;

b) Provide those health services needed by persons with disabilities specifically because of their disabilities, including early identification and intervention as appropriate, and services designed to minimize and prevent further disabilities, including among children and older persons;

c) Provide these health services as close as possible to people’s own communities, including in rural areas;

d) Require health professionals to provide care of the same quality to persons with disabilities as to others, including on the basis of free and informed consent by, inter alia, raising awareness of the human rights, dignity, autonomy and needs of persons with disabilities through training and the promulgation of ethical standards for public and private health care;

e) Prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities in the provision of health insurance, and life insurance where such insurance is permitted by national law, which shall be provided in a fair and reasonable manner;

f) Prevent discriminatory denial of health care or health services or food and fluids on the basis of disability.

I have no psychologist no psychiatrist and no GP. I don’t haver enough medicine or money to get it or access services.

Article 28 – Adequate standard of living and social protection

1. States Parties recognize the right of persons with disabilities to an adequate standard of living for themselves and their families, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions, and shall take appropriate steps to safeguard and promote the realization of this right without discrimination on the basis of disability.

2. States Parties recognize the right of persons with disabilities to social protection and to the enjoyment of that right without discrimination on the basis of disability, and shall take appropriate steps to safeguard and promote the realization of this right, including measures:

a) To ensure equal access by persons with disabilities to clean water services, and to ensure access to appropriate and affordable services, devices and other assistance for disability-related needs;

b) To ensure access by persons with disabilities, in particular women and girls with disabilities and older persons with disabilities, to social protection programmes and poverty reduction programmes;

c) To ensure access by persons with disabilities and their families living in situations of poverty to assistance from the State with disability-related expenses, including adequate training, counselling, financial assistance and respite care;

d) To ensure access by persons with disabilities to public housing programmes;

e) To ensure equal access by persons with disabilities to retirement benefits and programmes.

I have been living in my car as a homeless vagrant without any protections.

This letters purpose of this is to elicit a personalised response from ndis minister in providing crystal and I with a home. It needs to be provide4d to me through the scope of the ndis framed by the incredible detriment I have suffered and the political scapegoating I have endued and the sheer amount of prosperity that has been redacted from me. Should the NDIS minister reject my basic human rights demands, I will instruct my lawyer to sue her, aiming to cause maximum damage to her and her reputation. This legal action is based on her complicity in my proven victimization, part of the broader government conspiracy outlined and proven on this page.

Dr. Rich McLean died from a lethal injury in February 2021 beside Werribee Mercy Hospital. Barran Dodger was revived from certain death.

If you tolerate this, then you or your children will be next. Silence is complicity.

They were and are an artist, author, advocate, academic, government scapegoat, and, in retrospect since 2002, a targeted individual of the Australian Government.

He was defeated in the settlement of his illegal termination due to having no lawyer and rejected legal assistance.

His mental illness, as a publicly known existing vulnerability, is intentionally amplified with his poverty, which has been a sustained neglect by the government.

He called out corruption last attorney, Gerald.

The Attorney General Mark Dreyfus is silent. The prime minister refuses to meaningfully intervene in Barran’s situation protecting iasonidis.

It is simple to see the conspiracy because no government agency will admit my relationship with a former ASIO employee I was engaged to for five years ever existed

I also lived off a total permanent disability impairment payout from 2008 and at the start of the relationship I had $100000 and at the end my former partner left me homeless

The non acknowledgement of the relationship at a government level is profound corruption of lawyers of police of public officials and politicians

Every day I have lived in poverty from 2015 is another day corruption and the persecution of a government tyranny that victimises me and my curse of family violence wins

Dr Rich McLean suffered what was cited in the FOI as a 'fatal' self inflicted injury inside Weribee Mercy Hospital in feb, 2021. he had become a targeted individual of The Australian government.

thREe things basically murdered him that day via a method he now knows of 'no touch torture' which is method used politically and by proxy by public officials to elicit deliberate harm and get away with it because of them never being directly liable.

first the systemic and politicised victimisation that redacted his prosperity via corruption and obliterated his human rights and access to legal assistancE. Secondly the deceit and lies of a conspiracy orchestrated by a powerful lawyer who informed government policy. Third the curse of coercive financial control indicative of family violence from his former fiancé who was an ASIO employee.

Mental illness was not the cause but for being vilified with mental illness to the exclusion of all other socio political factors.

he was found unresponsive without an observable pulse by accident by a cleaner then revived from certain death.

In his place is Barran Dodger.

Despite attaining a doctorate later in life, Rich wrote an autobiography on his experience with schizophrenia. On the whole it was exceptionally well received.

But some like The Herald Sun vilified and humiliated him publicly. A week later he was illegally terminated from his job at The Age where he worked as an artist.

That was the beginning of a difficult life of being a targeted individual of The Australian Government.

herald.sun.defaming.my.descent.into.madness.jpeg

The financial detriments I have endured over the years, outlined below, have unequivocally been proven to be pre-determined decisions destined to fail. This is due to my lack of access to the law or legal assistance, as I have been psychometrically profiled by the government using my name, address, phone number, and digital identity. For a person with a disability, this contravenes the Human Rights Charter ratified by the government in 2008 under a UN charter.

The intentional suppression of all my prosperity resulted from decisions made at government statutory agencies by purchasable lawyers, corrupt public officials, and politicians too apprehensive to criticize their tyrannical overlords, who generously compensate them to maintain a life of luxury and privilege and adhere unwaveringly to the party line.

I empathize with them and the recipients of this letter for being constrained in their critical thinking, constrained by the powers that pay or bribe them. I, however, do not face the same restrictions, never have, and never will.

All these decisions were and are unethical, illegal, unbalanced, biased, immoral, and egregiously unfair to me. I have never had access to the law, and every government agency, with a multitude of lawyers backing the department or statutory authorities, was set up for my inevitable failure before any "decisions" were presented to me.

As the extensive list demonstrates, a substantial amount of financial detriment has been systematically redacted from me, constituting a form of victimization, which is clearly against the law.

Rich's quest for justice involves a myriad of settlements and compensations, each revealing a distressing pattern of mistreatment. These include a $300,000 unfair termination settlement from The Age newspaper, a $300,000 WorkCover settlement dating back to 2004, and a $500,000 incorrect Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) payment from 2008. In 2017, he secured a $300,000 settlement for medical malpractice, followed by a $750,000 HCF income assistance settlement in 2021 and another $750,000 WorkCover settlement. Various detriments include provisional payments from WorkCover amounting to $50,000, a $100,000 business insurance payout in 2021, and a $500,000 settlement from a former partner. Rich seeks $2,500,000 for a cognitive brain impairment sustained inside a hospital where a duty of care was breached, as well as $100,000 for the malicious destruction of his business website and $50,000 for the loss of worldly possessions. He faces substantial detriments, such as $2000000 after being banned at AFCA and $150000 due to insurance settlement mishandling at AHRC. Additionally, $25,000 is sought for accommodation issues blocked by the NDIS/A, and $250,000 for delayed and denied child sexual abuse redress from DSS. Legal battles include a $25,000 VOCAT case for a doomed child sexual abuse incident and another $25,000 VOCAT case for violent affray. Rich pursues $50,000 for being run over by a car, $200,000 for a violent hospital attack by a suspected government thug, and $300,000 for a provable conspiracy causing death. Lastly, $300,000 is sought for the whitewashing of this tragedy by high-ranking officials obligated to adhere to ethical standards outlined in the Public Services Act.

That's nearly fifty million dollars.

In hindsight, over the years of being denied access to legal help, it is now clear that these detriments were not a result of bad luck or coincidence. In fact, Rich was targeted, and by some higher power, it was decreed that he never be compensated for anything whatsoever. This constitutes a conspiracy and a blatant act of corruption. Rich was essentially robbed.

The perpetrators didn't stop at redacting the financial detriments that were legitimately owed to him; they went further and subjected him to torture. They even conspired, using deception and covert intelligence, to hire a thug who violently attacked him inside a public hospital.

Maliciously, they took away everything he had:

His business
His accreditation
His human rights
His access to the law
His reputation
His work cover
His insurances
His settlements
His fair treatment
His right to be treated impartially
His ability to rent a home

They not only removed his home but also destroyed its contents. He was force-medicated for 'delusions of persecution,' which were, in fact, real. They invaded his privacy, conducted surveillance on him, and banned him from various social media platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and more. They even destroyed his business website, which also served as his Australian Business Number (ABN), and maliciously eradicated his digital identity used for online logins.

Furthermore, they blocked his email from several government agencies, denied his access to The Federal Court, and refused his right to report crimes. They went as far as blocking him from the Australian Federal Police (AFP) on Instagram. They took away his hope, intercepted supporters on his phone, and controlled his contacts. Remote planting of illegal content on his personal computer, encouraging harmful activities, and allowing drug use and abuse through neglect became part of their actions.

They denied him his ADHD medication, dexamphetamine, deliberately causing harm. Character assassination, pruning of long-standing friends from his life, intentional isolation, and the use of subsonic audio harassment for torture and debilitation were employed. They lied about their commitment to his care, knowingly vilified him for 'mental illness,' and subjected him to torture. This conspiracy even extended to deception and covert intelligence, hiring a thug to violently attack him inside a public hospital.

Rich was violently attacked by a paid government contractor and an overall thug inside Werribee Mercy Hospital. Rich was convinced that this assault was intentional because the assailant was wearing a t-shirt featuring Rich's unique personal tattoo from his arm. As a Buddhist, Rich strongly opposes violence. However, after enduring years of persecution in a systemic and political manner, he found himself targeted and physically assaulted.

In an unexpected turn, Rich retaliated and successfully defended himself by smashing the assailant's face in. Strikingly, no complaint was ever lodged by the other individual involved, likely to avoid exposing the underlying conspiracy. The incident revealed a violent aspect to the conspiracy, demonstrating that they could infiltrate any person, government agency, or organization with the backing of intelligence operations and impunity.

This malicious movement appears to have no boundaries when it comes to demonizing and causing harm to Rich.

USE THIS SPACE TO PROMOTE YOUR BUSINESS

Rich was a rejected whistleblower in half a dozen Government agencies.

Now that he's exposed it and he is not protected he is a sitting duck for abuse exploration the redaction of his prosperity his human right destroyed and his legal rights abolished.

He felt his duty to call out corruption as his moral obligation to the country.

He has never had legal representation in defiance of the UN charter which states a disabled person must have access to the law and equality before it.

He cannot go to police - because they are in on it.

CRIMINALITY

Rich possesses a clean criminal record. However, the orchestrated conspiracy against him has coerced him into a situation that seemingly pushes him toward criminality. This unfortunate outcome stems from the deliberate erosion of his legal and human rights, coupled with the malicious suppression of numerous financial determinations. In hindsight, it becomes evident that these determinations were orchestrated by corrupt public officials, predestined to fail and contribute to the challenging circumstances Rich now faces.

DESTROY

Micron 21, a government-associated web hosting company, intentionally deleted Rich's website, which served both as his business website and housed his registered Australian Business Number (ABN). Additionally, they encoded the digital identity linked to his email address. This deliberate act was executed with impunity, and despite the severity of the situation, no government agency intervened or raised objections. The destruction of Rich's website transpired without any incident, further underscoring the distressing lack of opposition or intervention from relevant government entities.

HIS HOME

This was his home in Feb 2023.

It was a garage in Frankston where it was 42 degrees.

because his finances were redacted it was all he could afford for his dog and himself.

this is called detriment poverty and a human rights abuse deliberate with zero care for his welfare.

ITS ALREADY KILLED HIM

The Freedom of Information (FOI) request from Werribee Mercy Hospital sheds light on Rich's situation. It is essential to emphasize that Rich is not an extortionist, and the gravity of his circumstances forced him into an agonizing decision—to leave his cherished dog on earth and flee. His persecution has been relentless, enduring three arduous years marked by impoverishment, exacerbated by the prolonged financial abuse he endured. During this time, his voice has been systematically delegitimized, and the tragedy he faced has been unjustly whitewashed. It is crucial to recognize that the intent behind these actions was to cause harm to Rich, leaving an indelible mark on his life.

LEARN MORE

FATAL SUICIDE the attempt was lethal dos that.jpeg

workcover

This document from the Federal Court unequivocally affirms that Rich was, indeed, employed by the Department of Social Services (DSS), a crucial detail that should have facilitated the approval of his work cover. Despite this clear evidence, the government contested the assertion, arguing that he did not qualify as an employee under the Safety, Rehabilitation, and Compensation (SRC) Act. The document serves as concrete proof, not merely an opinion, confirming Rich's employment status.

Regrettably, when an individual is marked for destruction within a larger conspiracy, facts seem to lose their significance, and even the most indisputable evidence can be dismissed or ignored. This stark reality underscores the challenges faced by individuals entangled in complex situations where their rights and claims are unjustly contested.

DEATH THREAT

His former partner Stefan Iasonidis was done for million dollars of embezzlement for his corrupt finances.

Now Steve has threatened to kill both Rich and his dog Crystal.

The police will not listen.

Violence is not ok.

Rich has to protect his location from Iasonidis and police and a CAT team trying to incarcerate him.

aboutus

I’m a paragraph. Double click here or click Edit Text to add some text of your own or to change the font. Tell your visitors a bit about your services.

LEARN MORE

FOI

Richs FOI at office of prime minister and cabinet was 'voluminous' and 'complex' but then they turned around and stated no documents exist.

that is corruption and a blatant lie.

voluminous 15.05.2022 because your request is considered to be voluminous and_or complex.

BANNED

Rich's exclusion from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a statutory authority, has led to significant financial losses, with millions in determinations left unresolved. The governmental approach of "delay, deny, defer" when it comes to financial compensations is evident, underscoring a broader trend within the system.

The prohibition of a free democratic citizen from accessing public services, as exemplified by the AFCA ban, raises serious questions about the principles of fairness and accountability within the system.

Such exclusions challenge the foundational tenets of a democratic society, where individuals should have the right to access and participate in public services without arbitrary restrictions. The circumstances surrounding Rich's ban at AFCA highlight the need for a critical examination of the mechanisms that govern access and participation in public services to ensure transparency, fairness, and the protection of citizens' rights.

"No-touch torture" is a concept associated with psychological torture techniques that seek to inflict severe mental and emotional distress on an individual without direct physical contact. The aim is to break the victim's will, induce extreme stress, and create a sense of powerlessness. This form of torture often relies on psychological manipulation, sensory deprivation, and various stress-inducing methods. While it does not involve physical harm, its impact can be profound and long-lasting. Here are some key techniques associated with no-touch torture:

Psychological Manipulation:
- Gaslighting: Perpetrators engage in tactics to make the victim doubt their own perceptions, memories, and sanity. This involves presenting false information, denying facts, and distorting reality.
- Deception: The use of misinformation, false promises, and manipulation to control the victim's beliefs and decisions.
- Mind Games: Engaging in mental tactics designed to confuse, disorient, and destabilize the victim's mental state.
Isolation:
- Social Isolation: Keeping the victim away from friends, family, and any support network to intensify feelings of loneliness, helplessness, and despair.
- Physical Confinement: Restricting the victim's movement or confining them to a small, isolated space to enhance a sense of isolation.
Sensory Deprivation:
- Sleep Deprivation: Disrupting the victim's sleep patterns to induce exhaustion, impair cognitive function, and weaken resistance.
- Solitary Confinement: Keeping the individual in prolonged isolation to create a sense of loneliness, anxiety, and despair.
- Deprivation of Stimuli: Limiting exposure to external stimuli such as light, sound, or touch, leading to sensory monotony and mental distress.
Threats and Fear Induction:
- Psychological Threats: Creating an atmosphere of fear through verbal threats, intimidation, or the suggestion of impending harm.
- Fear of Unknown: Keeping the victim uncertain about their fate, future, or the duration of their ordeal to heighten anxiety.
Humiliation and Degradation:
- Verbal Abuse: Employing demeaning language, insults, and humiliation to break the victim's spirit and self-esteem.
- Forced Self-Incrimination: Pressuring the victim to confess to false or exaggerated accusations through various coercive tactics.
Manipulation of Time and Perception:
- Distorted Time Perception: Creating a sense of timelessness or elongating time to disorient the victim mentally.
- False Reality: Providing distorted or false information about the outside world to further confuse and destabilize the victim.

No-touch torture techniques are insidious and can have severe and lasting psychological effects, sometimes even more enduring than physical torture. The goal is to instill a profound sense of powerlessness and control over the victim's mind and emotions.

destroy him

Attempting to destroy an individual and silence them for calling out something a person or government wishes to keep hidden involves a range of manipulative and coercive techniques. These tactics can be psychological, legal, or involve a combination of both. Here are some examples:

Character Assassination:
- Spreading false rumors and misinformation to tarnish the person's reputation.
- Creating a negative narrative about the individual, framing them as mentally unstable or unreliable.
Legal Maneuvers:
- Filing baseless lawsuits or legal complaints to burden the person with legal troubles and financial strain.
- Exploiting loopholes in the legal system to prevent the person from effectively defending themselves.
Financial Control:
- Freezing assets, bank accounts, or other financial resources to cripple the person's financial stability.
- Manipulating economic circumstances to force financial dependence.
Isolation:
- Cutting off the individual from social support networks, friends, and family.
- Creating a sense of isolation to weaken the person's emotional resilience.
Surveillance and Harassment:
- Employing surveillance techniques to monitor the individual's activities.
- Engaging in harassment, both online and offline, to induce fear and anxiety.
Institutional Coercion:
- Exploiting positions of power within institutions to disadvantage the person.
- Suppressing or manipulating information within government agencies or organizations to hide the truth.
Gaslighting:
- Manipulating the individual's perception of reality to make them doubt their own experiences or memories.
- Undermining the credibility of the person's claims by sowing seeds of self-doubt.
Legal and Bureaucratic Obstacles:
- Denying access to legal representation or deliberately complicating legal processes.
- Creating bureaucratic hurdles to discourage the pursuit of justice or accountability.
Threats and Intimidation:
- Issuing direct threats or veiled warnings to instill fear and discourage further action.
- Using intimidation tactics to silence the person through fear of harm.
Selective Denial and Discrediting:
- Denying the existence of any wrongdoing or manipulation.
- Discrediting the person's claims by highlighting unrelated flaws or mistakes.
Whistleblower Suppression:
- Labelling the individual as a troublemaker or whistleblower, making it difficult for them to find support.
- Sabotaging any attempts the person makes to bring attention to the issues.
Emotional and Psychological Abuse:
- Subjecting the individual to emotional abuse, manipulation, or coercion.
- Inflicting mental stress through constant pressure and uncertainty.

These techniques are often used in combination, creating a multifaceted approach to suppress dissent and maintain control over information. It's important to note that these tactics are unethical and, in many cases, illegal. Whistleblower protection laws and human rights initiatives aim to safeguard individuals who expose wrongdoing, but their effectiveness can vary depending on the jurisdiction.

LEARN MORE

1. Homelessness and Lack of Basic Necessities:

2. Lack of Medical and Mental Health Care:

3. Complete Lack of Financial, Legal, and Social Support:

1. Protesting Against Systemic Neglect:

2. Deaf Ears from Authorities:

3. Driven by a Will to Live:

4. A Protest for Dignity and Survival:

Key Points from the Document:

Additional Instructions and Comments

THIS PLEA WAS IGNORED BY ALL - Subject Urgent Plea for Immediate Action and Demand for Guardianship at NCAT to Prevent Imminent Death Due to Government Negligence Corrupt Police and Psychological Torture.pdf'

1. Document 1: Urgent Plea for Immediate Action and Demand for Guardianship at NCAT to Prevent Imminent Death Due to Government Negligence, Corrupt Police, and Psychological Torture

Key Points:

Summary:

Evidence:

2. Document 2: Goodbye Letter (Murdered)

Key Points:

Summary:

Key Evidence in Both Documents:

15.09.2024 final goodbye letter.pdf Download in word .doc Download a PDF.

Instructions for Allocation of Compensation:

1. Failure to Respond to Threats

2. Potential Evidence of a Larger Conspiracy

3. Legal Implications

4. Communication Obstruction

Conclusion

1. Credibility and Corroboration of Your Claims

2. Legal Implications

a. Evidence of Criminal Activity (Gang Stalking and Harassment)

b. Duty of Care and Negligence

c. Grounds for Protective Action by Law Enforcement

Conclusion

1. Harassment and Death Threats

2. Surveillance and Intimidation

3. VOCAT Acknowledgment of Crimes

4. Negligence by Service Providers and Obstruction of Justice

5. Eviction by Aligned and Upscale Care

6. Negligence Following HIV Exposure

7. Threats to My Therapy Dog

8. Relationship with Former ASIO Employee Stefan Iasonidis

9. Whistleblower Status and Protections

10. Repeated Police and Ambulance Attendances

Relevant Legislation and Police Obligations

Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (Cth): Explanation of Police Obligations to Whistleblowers

Summary:

Evidence Presented:

Sent To:

Publishing to Save My Life: LOVE IN EXILE www.barrandodger.com.au

Slow and Deceitful Murder

A Call for Urgent Support and Justice

Exiled and Abandoned

Systemic Failure

Violence and Surveillance

A Life Destroyed by Corruption

Laws That Protect the Perpetrators

My Plea for Help

I currently have no home and have been cast from society a beggar. I have no legal rights, my human rights abuses documented and left uninvestigated. Please help my husky and I be safe from paid Government contractors and violent thugs.

I. A Rejected Whistleblower

II. Bill Shorten’s Collusion to Exile Me

III. Violent Government Conspiracy

IV. Systemic Abuse and Legal Manipulation

V. V2K Harassment and False Accusations

VI. NDIS Abuse and Financial Exploitation

VII. Egregious Human Rights Violations

VIII. Decades-Long Persecution

IX. Family Betrayal and Conditional Love

X. Weaponization of My Sexuality and Prostitution for Survival

XI. Police Harassment and Coercion

Conclusion

ESSAY: The Final Testament- The Systematic betrayal and targeted Killing of Barran Resonance Dodger.pdf (An insurance policy in case of suicide or murder).

Prior Eulogy

All Glory to God

Many thanks to SANE Australia for the betrayal of me along with every other cunt including an emergency whistleblowing document rejected at Lifeline holy fuck you wouldn't read about it... What, didn't you like me or something hahaha

ESSAY: BARRAN RESONANCE DODGER A CONSPIRACY TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE

Betrayed,, Murdered, Forsaken the harrowing journey of Barran Dodger

A donation is so gratefully received to help me buy food and medicine and find a home.

Opposing Illegal Eviction

www.barrandodger.com.au

BETRAYED, MURDERED, FORSAKEN By BARRAN DODGER

Betrayed, Murdered, Forsaken: The Harrowing Journey of Dr. Barran Dodger" narrates the story of Dr. Barran Dodger, who endured significant injustices and abuses framed by a survival story of resilience.

Summary for "Betrayed, Murdered, Forsaken"

15.09.2024 final goodbye letter.pdf
Download in word .doc
Download a PDF.