22/01/2024 - S100 appeal of decision by the NDIS by Dr Richard McLean and outline of Clauses for the review and continued agreement:     The NDIA/S Rebecca Faulkingham Bill Shorten NDIS Minister or other Government representative must acknowledge my s100 appeal and evidence: at https://barrandodger.wixsite.com/dr-rich-mclean The NDIA/S Rebecca Faulkingham Bill Shorten NDIS Minister or other Government representative must acknowledge my s100 appeal and evidence: at https://barrandodger.wixsite.com/dr-rich-mclean It is within my legal rights to make the appeal. Failure to read and respond to my appeal by either Rebecca Faulkingham, Bill Shorten or an NDIA government representative will identify the zero response as unethical neglectful and in silencing me which delegitimises my voice narrative and evidence. I cannot accept that this text below will not be responded to in good faith, and I will email it mhyself from different email accounts and also forward it to Zabin Hussein Khil my NDIS accomodation CEO of Free Living Australia, zabi@freelivingaustralia.com.au, Anas C at GenU my support coordinator, anas.c@genu.org.au, Bevan Rhys James, info@brjames.com.au, to make sure it gets to a recipient who will acknowledge it in a way eliciting my political impasse to immediately cease. NDIS Participant: Dr Richard William Mclean, NDIS Number: 430938559 Phone: 0451804410 DOB 08/04/1973 What decision do you want to review? Firstly that my MTA was in addition to my plan not inclusive of it please see evidence Carole GenU recorded stating she has receipt number That the NDIS are abusing me having witnessed me become homeless and act unethically in a systemic and politicised way that causes harm for example stating therewwill be no change to my SILS application. This was even before the reports were in in which my circumstances would be investigated thoroughly. The OT suddenly disappeared when she stated to me she would do more interviews over the weeks. The NDIS company then told me others would be used to complete the assessment when they have only known me a matter of weeks. The MTA was supposed to not save my homelessness but for the purposes of getting the SILS application done and it is impossible now to do that. I should still be in my MTA that was in addition to my plan until SILS report can be legitimately done. The last OT was corrupt - she gave me only twenty seven hours of support condoning my homelessness as she deceived me. This is evidence of corruption and it is intelligent and malicious and aims to cause me financial detriment. It is for this reason along with other systemic detriments that I had to hijack this document on my S100 review message for immediate acknowledgment. 2. But first ongoing decisions sustained every day by a decision to neglect to acknowledge evidence by the NDIA which proves complicity in a conspiracy that is financially abusing me and causing my homelessness and my detriment and likely suicide risk if the neglect continues. Evidence needed to be acknowledged is written in this document and on the website https://barrandodger.wixsite.com/dr-rich-mclean What was the date of this decision? Remember, you need to ask for a review within 3 months of our decision. What decision were you expecting? If your request is to review a decision about an NDIS-funded support, please detail the type of support you are seeking, hours of support and frequency. For example: ‘I need 4 hours additional social and community access support on a Saturday for 26 weeks so I can see my friends’ . OR ‘I need 20 hours of occupational therapy supports to assess my equipment needs’. OR ‘I need 9 hours of 1:1 daytime support each week for 12 months’ Has your situation changed since the decision was made? Do you have new evidence, such as medical or therapy reports you would like us to think about? If so - please send with this form. Why do you think we should make a different decision? Full name: Dr Rich Mclean Signature: RMcL Date: 22.01.2024 Title: The Resilient Journey: Dr. Richard McLean's Quest for Justice     Introduction:     1. Agreement Background:     2. Communication Limitations:     4. Immediate Negotiations:     5. Compassion and Forgiveness:     Subject: Urgent Appeal for Immediate Action on Neglect and Persecution of Mr. Mclean Under NDIS and Related Legislation S100     Subject: Agreement between [Your Name/Organization Name] and [Recipient's Name/Organization Name]     Subject: Agreement Acknowledging Systemic Victimisation and Neglect     WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge the following facts:     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:     Story     Subject: Agreement Regarding NDIS Review and Accountability     S100 appeal of decision by the NDIS by Dr Richard McLean and outline of Clauses for the review and continued agreement: 1. Agreement Background: a. Explanation of McLean's inability to ethically complete an S100 review of decisions made by the ndis. b. Mention of the alleged government conspiracy and persecution faced by McLean politically, financially, legally, and personally. c. Acknowledgment of McLean disguising the S100 review and ensuring its receipt by the ndis. 2. Communication Limitations: a. Statement regarding the ndis acting to limit communication from McLean. b. Mention of McLean's disadvantaged position and desperate need for support. 3. Acceptance of this S100 Review document: a. Requirement for the ndis to accept the S100 review delivered through various means and avenues. b. Stipulation that refusal to accept the review will result in the finalization of McLean's existence in his blacklisting. 4. Immediate Negotiations: a. Emphasis on the necessity for the ndis to sign the agreement, which will initiate immediate negotiations. b. Clarification that signing the agreement is a prerequisite for negotiations to commence. 5. Compassion and Forgiveness: a. McLean's approach to the agreement with compassion and humility towards his oppressors. b. Statement of McLean's intention to ultimately forgive everyone who has acted to his detriment. Please read until next section: Title: The Resilient Journey: Dr. Richard McLean's Quest for Justice Introduction: In a world where justice is often elusive, Dr. Richard McLean's battle against the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) stands as a testament to the indomitable human spirit. This document serves as an appeal, outlining the clauses for review and continued agreement, shedding light on the extraordinary circumstances that have shaped Dr. McLean's journey. 1. Agreement Background: a. Ethical Dilemma: Dr. McLean's unwavering commitment to ethical principles prevented him from completing an S100 review of decisions and expecting fair unbiased response made by the NDIS. That response to the S100 is mandatory coupled with additional information to be agreed upon by the NDIS. His conscience, a guiding force, urged him to seek justice through this alternative means. b. Unveiling the Conspiracy: Dr. McLean's path has been marred by alleged government conspiracy and persecution, manifesting in political, financial, legal, and personal hardships. These adversities have cast a shadow over his pursuit of truth and justice. c. The Art of Disguise: Acknowledging the challenges he faced, Dr. McLean ingeniously disguised the S100 review, ensuring its receipt by the NDIS. This act of resilience and determination underscores his unwavering commitment to his cause. 2. Communication Limitations: a. Silencing the Voice: The NDIS, in an attempt to limit communication, has impeded Dr. McLean's efforts to seek justice. This deliberate obstruction has further exacerbated his disadvantaged position, leaving him in desperate need of support. b. A Cry for Help: Dr. McLean's plea for understanding and assistance echoes through the corridors of injustice. His voice, stifled by the very system meant to protect the vulnerable, yearns to be heard. 3. Acceptance of this S100 Review Document: a. A Call for Acknowledgment: It is imperative that the NDIS accepts this S100 review, delivered through various means and avenues. Failure to acknowledge this review will mark the finalization of Dr. McLean's existence, as he is unjustly blacklisted. b. The Power of Choice: The NDIS holds the key to Dr. McLean's redemption. By accepting this review, they have the opportunity to rectify the wrongs that have plagued his life. 4. Immediate Negotiations: a. Urgency of Resolution: The NDIS must recognize the necessity of signing the agreement, which will initiate immediate negotiations. This step is crucial in paving the way for a fair and just resolution. b. A Prerequisite for Progress: Signing the agreement serves as a prerequisite for negotiations to commence. It is a symbolic gesture, signifying the NDIS's commitment to rectifying the injustices inflicted upon Dr. McLean. 5. Compassion and Forgiveness: a. A Noble Approach: Dr. McLean approaches this agreement with compassion and humility, even towards those who have oppressed him. His unwavering belief in the power of forgiveness serves as a beacon of hope, illuminating the path towards healing and reconciliation. b. Rising Above Adversity: Dr. McLean's intention to ultimately forgive everyone who has acted maliciously to his detriment showcases his resilience and strength of character. It is a testament to his unwavering spirit in the face of corruption, neglect, and the darkest of human experiences. Conclusion: Dr. Richard McLean's journey has been one of immense struggle, resilience, and unwavering determination. This document, appealing the NDIS's decision, sheds light on the extraordinary circumstances that have shaped his quest for justice. It is a plea for compassion, understanding, and ultimately, a fair resolution. May this appeal serve as a catalyst for change, inspiring a system that upholds justice, empathy, and the inherent worth of every individual. Please read until next section: Subject: Urgent Appeal for Immediate Action on Neglect and Persecution of Mr. Mclean Under NDIS and Related Legislation S100 Dear [NDIS Representative/Rebecca Faulkingham/Bill Shorten], I am writing to urgently bring to your attention the disturbing case of Mr. Mclean, a disabled individual who has been subjected to severe neglect and persecution, violating his rights under the NDIS Code of Conduct, Sex Discrimination Act, Disability Discrimination Act, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), and the Criminal Code Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Act 2016 (CRDM). Mr. Mclean has submitted a comprehensive S100 appeal challenging the decision to initially grant him $58,000 for the purposes of a Supported Independent Living (SILS) application, with a specific goal to address his homelessness. Shockingly, the goalposts were changed after the funds were spent, claiming the amount was inclusive of, not in addition to, his NDIS plan. Compelling evidence provided by Mr. Mclean includes a recorded statement from Carole, a representative from Gene, affirming the existence of a reference number proving the $58,000 was intended to be in addition to his NDIS plan. However, Carole has since disappeared, and despite Mr. Mclean's attempts to seek clarification on the receipt number and resolution of the issue, there has been no response from Gene or any effort to rectify this matter. Furthermore, the manager at GENU, an organization involved in Mr. Mclean's case, resorted to intimidating and threatening Mr. Mclean to take down a video that exposed corruption and protected him from the NDIS's malicious actions, aiming to exhaust his plan to elicit harm and homelessness. The S100 application, which was submitted as a trojan horse, has not been considered in a fair manner by the NDIS. Despite the accommodation being designated for a SILS application, the process was manipulated, with the Occupational Therapist being intercepted to prevent the completion of the report. It was then suggested that the report would be completed with support persons who have only known Mr. Mclean for a mere two weeks. This manipulation raises serious concerns about the deceitful tactics used in persecuting Mr. Mclean. To ensure that this urgent matter is addressed promptly, the S100 appeal will be sent via registered mail to ensure its receipt by the NDIS. This approach is necessary given the prior financial abuse Mr. Mclean experienced at the hands of Bill Shorten and the lack of acknowledgment from Rebecca Faulkingham regarding a letter published on his website, which demands a response. The profound neglect exhibited by Faulkingham condones violence and torture, and the urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. We demand an immediate investigation into the allegations presented by Mr. Mclean and insist on transparent and just actions to rectify the serious violations of his rights. Please read until next section: Subject: Agreement between [Your Name/Organization Name] and [Recipient's Name/Organization Name] Dear [NDIS Representative/Rebecca Faulkingham/Bill Shorten], This Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into between [Your Name/Organization Name] ("Party A") and [Recipient's Name/Organization Name] ("Party B") (collectively referred to as the "Parties") on this day of [Date]. 1. Background Party A and Party B acknowledge the following: a. Party A has raised concerns regarding the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and its treatment of [Your Name/Organization Name] ("McLean") in relation to the matters outlined in the description provided. b. Party B acknowledges the importance of addressing Party A's concerns and ensuring that McLean's rights and well-being are protected. 2. Revocation of Communication Methods Party B agrees to revoke any communication methods that McLean has with the NDIS, as it is understood that such communication has been interpreted as a means to silence and delegitimize McLean's voice, story, evidence, and the NDIS's obligations towards him as a human being and an NDIS participant under the NDIS Code of Conduct. 3. Ethical Obligations and Legal Support Party B agrees to act ethically and provide legal support to McLean. Additionally, Party B will act as a proxy for the government, which is obligated under the Charter of Human Rights of a Person with a Disability to assist McLean in seeking justice. 4. Acknowledgment of Persecution Party B acknowledges that they have been persecuting McLean and further acknowledges that the non-acknowledgment of the s100 review may lead to McLean's possible suicide or the publication of the document to expose the alleged conspiracy, neglect, and intentions to harm McLean by Rebecca Faulkingham and Bill Shorten. Party B recognizes that such actions would be in breach of their roles as human beings, public officials, and government employees. 5. Confidentiality Both Parties agree to keep the terms and conditions of this Agreement confidential, except as required by law or with the prior written consent of the other Party. 6. Governing Law and Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of [State/Country]. Any disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of [State/Country]. 7. Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, or representations, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. Please indicate your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by signing below. This Agreement shall become effective upon the signature of both Parties. [Dr Rich Mclean / Barran Dodger] [[NDIS Representative/Rebecca Faulkingham/Bill Shorten], ] __________________________ __________________________ [Your Name/Title] [Recipient's Name/Title] Date: _________________ Date: _________________ Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to resolving the issues outlined in this Agreement and working towards a mutually beneficial resolution. Sincerely, Dr Rich Mclean / Barran Dodger Subject: Agreement Acknowledging Systemic Victimisation and Neglect We, the undersigned parties, hereby enter into this agreement (the "Agreement") to acknowledge and address the systemic victimisation and neglect suffered by Richard McLean. This Agreement outlines the responsibilities and actions to be taken by the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in response to the aforementioned issues. 1. Acknowledgment of Victimisation: The NDIS acknowledges the systemic and politicised victimisation that Richard McLean has endured. 2. Authority and Government Relationship: The NDIS acknowledges that it is an authority of the government, while recognizing that the government has been perceived as Richard McLean's nemesis. 3. Persecution, Humiliation, and Vilification: The NDIS acknowledges that Richard McLean has experienced persecution, public humiliation, and vilification, which have been ongoing since the defamatory incident involving the Herald Sun. Furthermore, the NDIS acknowledges that Richard McLean's illegal termination from his job at an advanced age has exacerbated the situation. 4. Neglect and Duration: The NDIS acknowledges that Richard McLean has been subjected to neglect for a significant portion of his life, which has resulted in severe consequences. 5. Suicide Attempt and Causes: The NDIS acknowledges that Richard McLean's suicide attempt at Werribee Mercy Hospital in February 2021 was not a result of any mental illness but rather a consequence of deceit, neglect, lies, conspiracy, and family violence that affected him. 6. Severity of Suicide Attempt: The NDIS will acknowledge the severity of Richard McLean's suicide attempt, which was deemed fatal in the Werribee Mercy Freedom of Information report. 7. Neurologically Degenerative Symptoms: The NDIS will acknowledge the neurologically degenerative symptoms cited by Werribee Mercy Hospital, which are attributed to Richard McLean's suicide attempt. 8. Brain Malfunction and Impairments: The NDIS will immediately acknowledge that Richard McLean's brain malfunction resulting from the suicide attempt is now added to the list of impairments recognized by the NDIS. The NDIS acknowledges that this addition was previously purposefully neglected. 9. Awareness of Tragedy and Exploitation: The NDIS will acknowledge that they were aware of this tragedy and that their refusal to acknowledge the severity of the damage exploited Richard McLean, leading to further neglect and harm. The NDIS acknowledges that their actions were unconscionable and contributed to Richard McLean's struggle, homelessness, and victimization. 10. Abuse and Conspiracy: The NDIS acknowledges that Richard McLean has identified the abuse he has endured as "no touch torture" by the Australian government. The NDIS acknowledges that this abuse and conspiracy were the reasons behind his suicide attempt, not any mental illness, and that this conspiracy is liable for his murder. 11. Documentation and Neglect: Richard McLean can now provide extensive documentation proving this conspiracy, which aimed to cause him harm or even kill him through strategic neglect. The NDIS acknowledges that they were aware of this neglect and that no meaningful response was provided, highlighting the systemic neglect. 12. Profound Neglect and Financial Abuse: The NDIS acknowledges that the neglect Richard McLean has experienced is profound and has disabled him. The NDIS further acknowledges that this neglect extends beyond ignoring or neglecting him, but also includes attacks on his finances, preventing him from existing equitably in Australian society. 13. Financial Abuse and Obligations: The NDIS acknowledges that Stefan Iasonidis, Richard McLean's former fiancée and an ASIO employee, has orchestrated financial abuse. The NDIS acknowledges that no intervention has occurred from police officers, health services, lawyers, politicians, friends, or family members to solicit a settlement of assets from their five-year relationship. The NDIS acknowledges that the separation of assets is a legal obligation of the couple, and Richard McLean was left homeless while Stefan Iasonidis exploited him. 14. Legal Process and Investigation: The NDIS acknowledges their role in refusing to acknowledge the settlement as part of due legal process governing relationships. The NDIS further acknowledges that investigating this settlement is necessary before determining the Supported Independent Living (SILS) application, as it may negate Richard McLean's need for NDIS support. By signing this Agreement, the NDIS acknowledges the aforementioned issues and commits to taking appropriate actions to address the victimisation, neglect, and financial abuse suffered by Richard McLean. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of [Jurisdiction]. Any disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be resolved through good faith negotiations between the parties. Please indicate your agreement to the terms and conditions outlined in this Agreement by signing below. This Agreement shall become effective upon the signature of both parties. Dr Rich Mclean / Barran Dodger [Signature] 22.01.2024 [NDIS Representative/Rebecca Faulkingham/Bill Shorten], NDIS / Government Official [Signature] 22.01.2024 1. WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge the following facts: 1. McLean suffers from schizophrenia. 2. Iasonidis earns a monthly income ranging from $17,000 to $40,000, initially at Apple and later at ASIO. 3. Iasonidis admits that a relationship existed between the parties. 4. No government agency acknowledges the existence of the relationship. 5. Family law in Australia imposes an obligation on same-sex couples to amicably separate property and assets in a fair, equal, and legal manner, considering future earnings potential and any disability one party may have. 6. Iasonidis claims to have over a million dollars in superannuation, including Telstra shares. 7. It is a legal obligation for Iasonidis and McLean to separate their assets legally under the family law applicable to de facto gay couples, including superannuation. 8. Steve invested a million dollars into an offshore tax haven from the sale of a house bought through drug trafficking. 9. McLean receives a message on his phone stating that Iasonidis has been involved in a million-dollar embezzlement and has threatened to harm McLean's husky through a third party. 10. The police are aware of the relationship but do not legitimize it. 11. McLean's PIDs (Public Interest Disclosures) have been rejected by various government agencies. 12. AGIS, the agency responsible for investigating ASIO, is aware of the situation but refuses to investigate Iasonidis. 13. OPMC rejects McLean's FOI (Freedom of Information) request, which was described as "voluminous" and "complex," and now claims it cannot be located or does not exist. 14. McLean's letter to the Prime Minister received a response but failed to meaningfully intervene in systemic corruption. 15. The Prime Minister's office referred McLean to Attorney General Mark Dreyfus' office, which directed McLean to lodge a complaint with AGIS or the Commonwealth Ombudsman. 16. The Commonwealth Ombudsman rejects McLean's PID on the grounds that he is not a public official, despite evidence proving otherwise. 17. The Commonwealth Ombudsman refuses all future correspondence from McLean. 18. Rich lost his work cover from 2021, which was transferred from WorkSafe in Victoria to Comcare, where the claim was rejected on the basis that he was not an employee under the SRC Act. 19. The Federal Court, while rejecting McLean's PID, inadvertently acknowledged that he is or was an employee of DSS (Department of Social Services). 20. This statement is a factual representation on a Federal Court letterhead by an individual qualified to make it and is not merely an opinion. 21. Member Purnell at the AAT (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) upheld Comcare's decision, defended by high-profile lawyer Kate Watson. 22. McLean appealed to the Ombudsman and the Attorney General's office, knowing that the ruling was predetermined to fail, and was denied access to a lawyer due to profiling. 23. McLean is banned from AFCA (Australian Financial Complaints Authority). 24. McLean lost a potential million-dollar settlement at AHRC (Australian Human Rights Commission) when AHRC canceled the conciliation process, with TAL and Australian Super's involvement, due to government interference. 25. McLean has never had access to legal representation for his numerous legal issues over the past fifty years. 26. McLean is a rejected whistleblower. 27. McLean has been unable to report any crimes to the police. 28. McLean's human rights abuses were documented by an NDIS (National Disability Insurance Scheme) support worker from Free Living Australia. 29. Free Living Australia did not sign off on the report, which would have legitimized McLean's claims of inequality, human rights abuses, victimization, and oppression. 30. AHRC has refused McLean's PID and neglected to act on various other issues, including the human rights abuses report from the NDIS support worker. 31. NDIS and NDIS companies, such as Free Living Australia, have an obligation to report any abuse of a vulnerable person under their care as participants of the NDIS, as per the NDIS Code of Conduct. 32. The Charter of Human Rights CRDM of a disability was ratified by the government in 2008, underpinning the ethos of Australian laws affecting people with disabilities. 33. Rich has been diagnosed with schizophrenia, ADHD, adjustment disorder, and a cognitive brain impairment. 34. The brain impairment resulted from an attempted suicide in January 2021, which McLean claims was not due to mental illness but due to deceit, lies, isolation, conspiracy, vilification, and coercive financial control by the hospital and Iasonidis, with the hospital complicit in family violence. 35. Werribee Mercy Hospital's FOI states that McLean's injury was "fatal," and he was revived from certain death. However, there is evidence of whitewashing of McLean's tragedy by HCC, MHCC, the police, IBAC, Werribee Mercy Hospital, and the Ombudsman. 36. No one defended McLean's rights under the settlement of assets with Iasonidis or the potential settlement with Werribee Mercy Hospital, which had a duty of care towards him. 37. The NDIS had McLean as a client for over four years but consciously watched him become homeless and forced to sleep in his car. 38. In December 2023, the NDIS granted $58,000 to accommodate McLean, not to solve his homelessness but for the purposes of a SILS (Supported Independent Living) application. 39. The NDIS has already indicated, even before the completion of reports by the OT (Occupational Therapist) and behaviorist specialists, that there is no expectation of any change in McLean's past rejection of his SILS. 40. The OT, Georgia, stated that multiple interviews over weeks would be required to provide a comprehensive report for the SILS application. 41. Georgia canceled future sessions and stated that information would be collected from support coordinators who had only known McLean for two weeks. 42. Despite intentions to collect a more detailed snapshot of McLean's needs for the SILS, future sessions were canceled, and the report could not be completed effectively. 43. McLean was forced out of his accommodation, and the SILS report was never completed. 44. Georgia had full intentions of making a more comprehensive report, but an intervention prevented her from doing so, rendering the report incomplete. 45. The NDIS had already indicated that they expected no change to McLean's SILS application, not only before the completion of Georgia's reports but also due to an interception that prevented a comprehensive report from being completed. 46. Towards the end of McLean's $58,000 accommodation, the NDIS stated that the funding was inclusive of his plan and not in addition to it. 47. McLean was outraged by this change, as it contradicted the previous confirmation from Carole at Gene that the funding was additional to his plan. 48. McLean recorded a phone conversation with Carole, which confirmed the receipt number and the additional funding. 49. Carole was replaced by Anus, who did not confirm the receipt number during the handover. 50. The CEO of GenU threatened legal action against McLean to remove the recording of Carole, which could potentially save McLean's plan from being intentionally terminated, leaving him homeless under the NDIS's watch. 51. Rebecca Faulkingham, the CEO of the NDIS, refused to acknowledge a public letter from McLean, demanding acknowledgment of his former relationship with Iasonidis and other issues caused by the government's conscious redaction of detriments over the past twenty years. 2. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge that: 1. Iasonidis and McLean were engaged to be married from 2010-2015. 2. The NDIS has been served with evidence of the engagement and relationship. 3. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official, along with the NDIS and Minister Bill Shorten, will acknowledge and legitimize the facts proving the relationship, leading to delays in justice for a potential settlement of $500,000. 4. The NDIS insurance money received by McLean is insufficient to meet his accommodation, medicine, or food needs related to his disability. 5. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official, along with the NDIS and Minister Bill Shorten, will acknowledge and respond to McLean's communications, emails, and calls, avoiding malicious neglect and acknowledging his existence. 6. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and validate McLean's lived experience and attempts to communicate, rejecting any form of gaslighting that damages him beyond repair. 7. McLean suffers from schizophrenia, ADHD, adjustment disorder, anxiety, depression, and a cognitive brain injury resulting from a suicide attempt due to 'no touch torture.' 8. Iasonidis earns $17,000-40,000 a month at Apple, then at ASIO, and admits the relationship existed. 9. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and act meaningfully to elicit a legal settlement, recognizing the obligations of family law in Australia for same-sex couples. 10. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge the message McLean received about Iasonidis being involved in a million-dollar embezzlement and a threat to kill McLean's husky. 11. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and legitimize the relationship known to the police, preventing further cover-ups or denial. 12. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and respond to McLean's PIDs from various government agencies, ensuring fair treatment. 13. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge the refusal of AGIS to investigate Iasonidis, ensuring a proper investigation. 14. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and address OPMC's rejection of McLean's FOI, promoting transparency. 15. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and respond to the situation where McLean lost work cover, ensuring fair treatment. 16. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and address McLean's ban at AFCA, promoting fairness. 17. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and legitimize McLean's human rights abuses documented by an NDIS support worker, promoting justice and accountability. 18. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge the failure to complete the SILS report under her leadership, ensuring a proper assessment. 19. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and respond to the situation where McLean was forced out of his accommodation, addressing the systemic failure. 20. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and respond to the changing expectations regarding McLean's SILS application, ensuring fair treatment. 21. Ms Falkingham / Mr Shorten / Other representative of the NDIA / Government official will acknowledge and respond to McLean's public letter, addressing the demand for recognition of his former relationship with Iasonidis and access to mainstream services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Separation of Assets: Iasonidis and McLean shall legally separate their assets in accordance with the family law applicable to de facto gay couples, including superannuation. 2. Confidentiality: The parties agree to keep the terms and conditions of this Agreement confidential, except as required by law. 3. Dispute Resolution: Any disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be resolved through mediation or arbitration, as agreed upon by the parties. 4. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of [Jurisdiction]. 5. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior oral or written agreements, understandings, or representations. 6. Severability: If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 7. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. [Party A] Name: Dr Rich Mclean / Barran Dodger Title: [Party B] Name: [NDIS Representative/Rebecca Faulkingham/Bill Shorten], Title: Story In a world where reality blurs with the shadows of conspiracy and corruption, McLean finds himself trapped in the clutches of schizophrenia. His mind, a labyrinth of twisted thoughts and fragmented perceptions, battles against the darkness that threatens to consume him. Meanwhile, Iasonidis, a figure shrouded in mystery, dances between the realms of fortune and uncertainty. From the hallowed halls of Apple to the enigmatic depths of ASIO, his monthly income fluctuates between the extravagant heights of $17,000 and the dizzying peaks of $40,000. A man of secrets, he reluctantly admits to a connection with McLean, a connection that exists in the shadows, unseen and unacknowledged by any government agency. In the realm of family law, where fairness and equality should reign supreme, same-sex couples like Iasonidis and McLean are bound by an obligation to separate their property and assets in a manner that considers not only their present circumstances but also their future potential and any disabilities that may afflict them. It is a legal mandate, a requirement that cannot be ignored. Amidst the chaos, Iasonidis claims to possess a fortune worth over a million dollars, a treasure trove that includes the coveted Telstra shares. But even this wealth cannot shield him from the legal obligation to divide his assets with McLean, a duty imposed upon them by the family law that governs the lives of de facto gay couples. In a world where shadows loom and secrets thrive, Steve, a man entangled in a web of illicit activities, seeks refuge in an offshore tax haven. A million dollars, tainted by the proceeds of drug trafficking, finds its sanctuary in this clandestine sanctuary. But the darkness that surrounds him threatens to consume him, as the consequences of his actions loom ever closer. As the threads of their lives intertwine, McLean receives a chilling message on his phone. It speaks of Iasonidis's involvement in a million-dollar embezzlement, a crime that not only endangers their fragile connection but also threatens the safety of McLean's beloved husky. The police, aware of their relationship, turn a blind eye, refusing to legitimize their bond. In a desperate bid for justice, McLean turns to the powers that be, hoping that his voice will be heard. But his pleas fall on deaf ears, rejected by various government agencies. AGIS, the agency tasked with investigating ASIO, is aware of the situation, yet refuses to delve into the depths of Iasonidis's actions. OPMC, the gatekeeper of information, rejects McLean's FOI request, claiming that the evidence he seeks cannot be located or simply does not exist. Undeterred, McLean pens a heartfelt letter to the Prime Minister, seeking intervention in the face of systemic corruption. But the response he receives is nothing more than empty words, failing to address the deep-rooted issues that plague his existence. Instead, he is directed to Attorney General Mark Dreyfus' office, a futile attempt to find solace in a system that seems determined to turn a blind eye. The Commonwealth Ombudsman, the supposed guardian of justice, rejects McLean's pleas, dismissing him as a non-public official, despite the overwhelming evidence that proves otherwise. They refuse to engage in any further correspondence, leaving McLean to navigate the treacherous waters of injustice alone. Rich, a man burdened by his own demons, finds himself entangled in a web of legal complexities. His work cover, once a lifeline, is snatched away in 2021, as his claim is rejected under the pretense that he is not an employee under the SRC Act. The Federal Court, in a cruel twist of fate, inadvertently acknowledges McLean's connection to the Department of Social Services, even as they reject his pleas for justice. In the realm of human rights, McLean's voice is silenced, his rights trampled upon. The NDIS, an organization meant to support and protect the vulnerable, watches as McLean spirals into homelessness, forced to seek refuge in the confines of his car. They grant him a meager sum of $58,000, not to alleviate his suffering, but as a mere formality for a SILS application. But even this semblance of hope is shattered, as the OT and behaviorist specialists tasked with assessing McLean's needs cancel future sessions, leaving his SILS report incomplete. The NDIS, already determined to deny him any change in his circumstances, disregards the evidence and the pleas for help. In the face of adversity, McLean's spirit remains unbroken. He fights for his rights, for justice, for the acknowledgement of his former relationship with Iasonidis. But his pleas fall on deaf ears, ignored by Rebecca Faulkingham, the CEO of the NDIS, who refuses to acknowledge his public letter. In this world of neglect and despair, where suicide lurks in the shadows and malicious intent taints every interaction, McLean stands as a rejected whistleblower. His cries for help go unheard, his attempts to report crimes to the police fall on deaf ears. His human rights abuses, meticulously documented by an NDIS support worker, are dismissed and disregarded. Free Living Australia, the organization entrusted with McLean's care, fails to sign off on the report, denying the legitimacy of his claims. AHRC, the beacon of hope for justice, refuses to act, turning a blind eye to the human rights abuses that stain McLean's existence. In a world governed by laws and regulations, the Charter of Human Rights CRDM of a disability stands as a testament to the rights of those with disabilities. But even this noble document, ratified by the government in 2008, fails to protect McLean from the clutches of deceit, lies, and isolation. Rich, burdened by his own mental health struggles, finds solace in a diagnosis that encompasses schizophrenia, ADHD, adjustment disorder, and a cognitive brain impairment. But the origins of this impairment, McLean claims, lie not in mental illness, but in a web of deceit and coercion spun by the hospital and Iasonidis. The hospital, complicit in family violence, whitewashes McLean's tragedy, leaving him to fight for justice alone. As the darkness closes in, McLean finds himself abandoned by those who should have defended his rights. Werribee Mercy Hospital, entrusted with his care, turns a blind eye to his suffering. The police, IBAC, and the Ombudsman, all complicit in the cover-up, refuse to acknowledge the truth. In the realm of justice, where fairness and equality should reign supreme, McLean is left to fend for himself. The NDIS, tasked with protecting the vulnerable, watches as he becomes homeless, his pleas for help falling on deaf ears. The CEO of GenU, threatened by the truth, seeks to silence McLean, leaving him to face the harsh realities of homelessness under the watchful eye of the NDIS. In a world where corruption and neglect thrive, McLean's voice is silenced, his rights trampled upon. His pleas for justice go unanswered, his cries for help ignored. But amidst the darkness, a flicker of hope remains, as McLean refuses to surrender to the forces that seek to destroy him. Subject: Agreement Regarding NDIS Review and Accountability Dear [NDIS Representative/Rebecca Faulkingham/Bill Shorten], This Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between [Your Name] ("Party A") and [Recipient's Name] ("Party B") (collectively referred to as the "Parties") on this day of [Date]. 1. Background Party A has submitted a review request to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in the form of an S100 review. Party B, representing the NDIS, has refused to accept the S100 review in its current form. This Agreement aims to address the concerns raised by Party A and establish a framework for accountability. 2. Refusal of NDIS Review Party A acknowledges that the NDIS has refused to accept the S100 review in its current form. Party B agrees to review the additional agreements proposed by Party A, which are to be immediately signed by Rebecca Faulkingham, Bill Shorten, or a representative from the NDIS. 3. Continued Publication In the event that Party B fails to accept the additional agreements proposed by Party A, Party A reserves the right to continue publishing this document. Party A expresses a strong desire for accountability in their quest for justice. 4. Acknowledgment of Neglect Party B acknowledges that if McLean were to experience profound neglect resulting in suicide, Party A holds the belief that Rebecca Faulkingham, Bill Shorten, Steve Iasonidis, and others should be named and shamed as malicious individuals who intended to harm McLean. Party B understands that George Brandis' legislative changes may limit prosecution or liability for harm, detriment, or murder. However, Party A asserts that the reputations of the aforementioned individuals will be severely damaged for the remainder of their natural lives. 5. Confidentiality Both Parties agree to keep the terms and conditions of this Agreement confidential, except as required by law or with the prior written consent of the other Party. 6. Governing Law and Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of [State/Country]. Any disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of [State/Country]. 7. Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, or representations, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. Please indicate your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by signing below. This Agreement shall become effective upon the signature of both Parties. [Dr Rich Mclean] [Recipient's Name] [.                       ] [.                            ] Date: 22.01.2024 Witnessed by: [Witness Name] [Witness Signature] Date: [Witness Address] [City, State, POSTCODE] Please retain a copy of this Agreement for your records. Sincerely, Dr Rich Mclean / Barran Dodger This completes Dr Rich McLean’s submission for the S100 review in which the review was already doomed to fail by way of complicity in the conspiracy and corruption.